Literature DB >> 27061311

Competency based medical education in gastrointestinal motility.

R Yadlapati1, R N Keswani2, J E Pandolfino2.   

Abstract

Traditional apprenticeship-based medical education methods focusing on subjective evaluations and case-volume requirements do not reliably produce clinicians that provide high-quality care in unsupervised practice. Consequently, training approaches are shifting towards competency based medical education, which incorporates robust assessment methods and credible standards of physician proficiency. However, current gastroenterology and hepatology training in the US continues to utilize procedural volume and global impressions without standardized criteria as markers of competence. In particular, efforts to optimize competency based training in gastrointestinal (GI) motility are not underway, even though GI motility disorders account for nearly half of outpatient gastroenterology visits. These deficiencies compromise the quality of patient care. Thus, there is a great need and opportunity to shift our focus in GI motility training towards a competency based approach. First, we need to clarify the variable rates of learning for individual diagnostic tests. We must develop integrated systems that standardize training and monitor physician competency for GI motility diagnostics. Finally, as a profession and society, we must create certification processes to credential competent physicians. These advances are critical to optimizing the quality of GI motility diagnostics in practice.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competency based medical education; gastrointestinal motility; health care quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061311      PMCID: PMC5042850          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  13 in total

1.  The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists.

Authors:  John Roger Barton; Sally Corbett; Cees Petronella van der Vleuten
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The Gastroenterology Core Curriculum, Third Edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Hospital credentialing and privileging of surgeons: a potential safety blind spot.

Authors:  Jason C Pradarelli; Darrell A Campbell; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Advanced training in neurogastroenterology and gastrointestinal motility.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy.

Authors:  Sachin Gupta; Paul Bassett; Ripple Man; Noriko Suzuki; Margaret E Vance; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Status of Competency-Based Medical Education in Endoscopy Training: A Nationwide Survey of US ACGME-Accredited Gastroenterology Training Programs.

Authors:  S G Patel; R Keswani; G Elta; S Saini; P Menard-Katcher; J Del Valle; L Hosford; A Myers; D Ahnen; P Schoenfeld; S Wani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Variation in Aptitude of Trainees in Endoscopic Ultrasonography, Based on Cumulative Sum Analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Matthew Hall; Rajesh N Keswani; Harry R Aslanian; Brenna Casey; Rebecca Burbridge; Amitabh Chak; Ann M Chen; Gregory Cote; Steven A Edmundowicz; Ashley L Faulx; Thomas G Hollander; Linda S Lee; Daniel Mullady; Faris Murad; V Raman Muthusamy; Patrick R Pfau; James M Scheiman; Jeffrey Tokar; Mihir S Wagh; Rabindra Watson; Dayna Early
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Gregory A Coté; Rajesh Keswani; Daniel Mullady; Riad Azar; Faris Murad; Steve Edmundowicz; Srinadh Komanduri; Lee McHenry; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Matthew Hall; Christine E Hovis; Thomas G Hollander; Dayna Early
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: establishing criteria for competency.

Authors:  Louise Preisler; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Nikolaj Nerup; Lars Bo Svendsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Benchmarks for the interpretation of esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  R Yadlapati; R N Keswani; K B Dunbar; A J Gawron; C P Gyawali; P J Kahrilas; P O Katz; D Katzka; S J Spechler; R Tatum; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Training in Gastrointestinal Motility.

Authors:  Sonia S Yoon; Braden Kuo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A System to Assess the Competency for Interpretation of Esophageal Manometry Identifies Variation in Learning Curves.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Rajesh N Keswani; Jody D Ciolino; David P Grande; Zoe I Listernick; Dustin A Carlson; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Andrew J Gawron; C Prakash Gyawali; Philip O Katz; David Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  New Developments in Esophageal Motility Testing.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Glenn T Furuta; Paul Menard-Katcher
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03

6.  Esophageal Manometry Competency Program Improves Gastroenterology Fellow Performance in Motility Interpretation.

Authors:  Kelli DeLay; John E Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali; Jeanetta Frye; Alexander Kaizer; Paul Menard-Katcher; Joshua A Sloan; Andrew J Gawron; Kathryn Peterson; Dustin A Carlson; Abraham Khan; Rajesh N Keswani; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

7.  Assessing an assessment: The review and redesign of a competency-based mid-degree evaluation.

Authors:  Colleen A Mayowski; Marie K Norman; Wishwa N Kapoor
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-11-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.