Literature DB >> 27060426

High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.

Brian T Clark1, Loren Laine2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of bowel preparation quality has been well-characterized for detection of adenomas but not for detection of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSPs). We performed a prospective study to determine proportions of patients in whom SSPs were detected at different levels of bowel preparation quality, using common validated scoring systems.
METHODS: Our study enrolled 749 male veterans 50-75 years old undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Proportions of patients in whom SSP were detected were calculated for each level of preparation quality based on the Aronchick scale (poor = low quality, fair = intermediate quality, and good or excellent = high quality) and the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS; scores of 0-3 for right, transverse, and left colon segments). We compared SSP detection among different levels of preparation quality using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age, indication, and endoscopist. Our primary hypothesis was that SSP detection would not be significantly lower with intermediate-quality than with high-quality preparations.
RESULTS: SSPs were detected in a significantly smaller proportion of patients with intermediate-quality preparation than high-quality preparation, for the entire colon (4.6% vs 12.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.87) and right colon (1.5% vs 7.9%; OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.81). SSPs were detected in smaller proportions of patients with total colon BBPS scores <7 than in patients with BBPS scores of 7-9 (4.7% vs 12.6%; OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.67). SSPs were detected in right colons of a smaller percentage of patients with BBPS scores of 2 than scores of 3 (4.7% vs 9.5%; OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94).
CONCLUSIONS: Any bowel preparation quality below high quality is associated with a significant decrease in the detection of SSPs. Although intermediate-quality preparation and BBPS segment scores of 2 seem to be adequate for detection of adenomas, these levels of preparation quality may not be adequate for detection of SSPs.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasm; Early Detection; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27060426      PMCID: PMC4955697          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  36 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.

Authors:  Shannon R Payne; Timothy R Church; Michael Wandell; Thomas Rösch; Neal Osborn; Dale Snover; Robert W Day; David F Ransohoff; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Eric A Sherer; Timothy D Imler; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; David G Hewett; Dustin Lee Norton; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Vincent de Jonge; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Djuna L Cahen; Willem Moolenaar; Rob J Th Ouwendijk; Thjon J Tang; Antonie J P van Tilburg; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers.

Authors:  Mandeep S Sawhney; William D Farrar; Srivani Gudiseva; Douglas B Nelson; Frank A Lederle; Thomas S Rector; John H Bond
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  25 in total

1.  Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hui Jia; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Lina Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Hui Luo; Zhizheng Ge; Jun Liu; Jianyu Hao; Ping Yao; Yao Zhang; Hongyu Ren; Weizhen Zhou; Yujie Guo; Wei Zhang; Xiaolin Chen; Dayong Sun; Xiaoqiang Yang; Xiaoyu Kang; Na Liu; Zhiguo Liu; Felix Leung; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

3.  Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Michele Morris; David S Carrell; Sherri Rose; Zhuo Shi; Julia B Greer; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  Management of Serrated Polyps of the Colon.

Authors:  Claire Fan; Adam Younis; Christine E Bookhout; Seth D Crockett
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

5.  Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.

Authors:  Viral D Patel; William K Thompson; Brittany R Lapin; Jay L Goldstein; Eugene F Yen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Patient Education After Inadequate Bowel Preparation: Improving Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher Miniter
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-07

Review 7.  Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Fotios S Fousekis; Ioannis V Mitselos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 8.  Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect.

Authors:  Michael X Ma; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Safety and efficacy of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid bowel preparation in patients with baseline renal impairment or diabetes: subanalysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gautam N Mankaney; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.

Authors:  Sandra Baile-Maxia; Bharat Amlani; Rodrigo Jover Martínez
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.