Muriel Abbaci1,2, Peggy Dartigues3, Frederic De Leeuw4,5, Ranya Soufan3, Monique Fabre3, Corinne Laplace-Builhé6,7. 1. Gustave Roussy, Imaging and Cytometry Platform, UMS AMMICa, Université Paris-Saclay, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. muriel.abbaci@gustaveroussy.fr. 2. IR4M, CNRS, Univ. Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France. muriel.abbaci@gustaveroussy.fr. 3. Gustave Roussy, Department of Pathology, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 4. Gustave Roussy, Imaging and Cytometry Platform, UMS AMMICa, Université Paris-Saclay, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. 5. IR4M, CNRS, Univ. Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France. 6. Gustave Roussy, Imaging and Cytometry Platform, UMS AMMICa, Université Paris-Saclay, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. corinne.laplace@gustaveroussy.fr. 7. IR4M, CNRS, Univ. Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France. corinne.laplace@gustaveroussy.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a metastatic stage aggravating abdominal and pelvic cancer dissemination. The preoperative evaluation of lesions remains difficult today. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides dynamic images of tissue architecture and cellular details. This technology allows in vivo histological interpretation of tissue. The main limitation of pCLE for adoption in the clinic is the unavailability of fluorescent contrast agents. The aim of our study was to evaluate the staining performance of indocyanine green and patent blue V for histological diagnosis of pCLE images of pathological and non-pathological peritoneal tissue. METHODS: We performed a correlative study with the histological gold standard on ex vivo human specimens from 25 patients operated for peritoneal carcinomatosis; 70 specimens were stained by topical application with ICG or patent blue V and then imaged with a probe-based confocal laser endomicroscope. A total of 350 pCLE images and 70 corresponding histological sections were randomly and blindly interpreted by two pathologists (PT1 and PT2). The images were first classified into two categories, tumoral versus non-tumoral, and a refined histological diagnosis was then given. RESULTS: All presented images were interpreted by PT1 (who received prior training on PCLE image reading) and PT2 (no training). 100 % sensitivity for PT1 and PT2 was noticed with tissues stained with ICG to differentiate tumoral and non-tumoral tissue. Global scores were always better for PT1 (major concordance between 86 and 94 %) than for PT2 (major concordance between 77 and 89 %) independently of the fluorescent dye when histological diagnosis was done on pCLE images. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the pair ICG-pCLE offers the best combination for a non-trained pathologist for the interpretation of pCLE images from peritoneum.
BACKGROUND:Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a metastatic stage aggravating abdominal and pelvic cancer dissemination. The preoperative evaluation of lesions remains difficult today. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides dynamic images of tissue architecture and cellular details. This technology allows in vivo histological interpretation of tissue. The main limitation of pCLE for adoption in the clinic is the unavailability of fluorescent contrast agents. The aim of our study was to evaluate the staining performance of indocyanine green and patent blue V for histological diagnosis of pCLE images of pathological and non-pathological peritoneal tissue. METHODS: We performed a correlative study with the histological gold standard on ex vivo human specimens from 25 patients operated for peritoneal carcinomatosis; 70 specimens were stained by topical application with ICG or patent blue V and then imaged with a probe-based confocal laser endomicroscope. A total of 350 pCLE images and 70 corresponding histological sections were randomly and blindly interpreted by two pathologists (PT1 and PT2). The images were first classified into two categories, tumoral versus non-tumoral, and a refined histological diagnosis was then given. RESULTS: All presented images were interpreted by PT1 (who received prior training on PCLE image reading) and PT2 (no training). 100 % sensitivity for PT1 and PT2 was noticed with tissues stained with ICG to differentiate tumoral and non-tumoral tissue. Global scores were always better for PT1 (major concordance between 86 and 94 %) than for PT2 (major concordance between 77 and 89 %) independently of the fluorescent dye when histological diagnosis was done on pCLE images. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the pair ICG-pCLE offers the best combination for a non-trained pathologist for the interpretation of pCLE images from peritoneum.
Authors: Kenneth K Wang; David L Carr-Locke; Satish K Singh; Helmut Neumann; Helga Bertani; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Razvan I Arsenescu; Fabrice Caillol; Kenneth J Chang; Stanislas Chaussade; Emmanuel Coron; Guido Costamagna; Aldona Dlugosz; S Ian Gan; Marc Giovannini; Frank G Gress; Oleh Haluszka; Khek Y Ho; Michel Kahaleh; Vani J Konda; Frederic Prat; Raj J Shah; Prateek Sharma; Adam Slivka; Herbert C Wolfsen; Alvin Zfass Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Adam S Wellikoff; Robert C Holladay; Gordon H Downie; Catherine S Chaudoir; Luis Brandi; Elba A Turbat-Herrera Journal: Respirology Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Valentin Becker; Tom Vercauteren; Claus Hann von Weyhern; Christian Prinz; Roland M Schmid; Alexander Meining Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: M B Wallace; A Meining; M I Canto; P Fockens; S Miehlke; T Roesch; C J Lightdale; H Pohl; D Carr-Locke; M Löhr; E Coron; B Filoche; M Giovannini; J Moreau; C Schmidt; R Kiesslich Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Philipp von Breitenbuch; Tonia Jeiter; Stephan Schreml; Gabriel Glockzin; Ayman Agha; Pompiliu Piso; Hans J Schlitt Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Quirijn R J G Tummers; Charlotte E S Hoogstins; Alexander A W Peters; Cor D de Kroon; J Baptist M Z Trimbos; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Katja N Gaarenstroom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kamal V Patel; Amir A Darakhshan; Nyree Griffin; Andrew B Williams; Jeremy D Sanderson; Peter M Irving Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 46.802