Giovanni Corona1, Corinna Giuliani2, Gabriele Parenti3, Giorgio L Colombo4, Alessandra Sforza1, Mario Maggi5, Gianni Forti2, Alessandro Peri6. 1. Endocrinology Unit, Maggiore-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy. 2. Endocrine Unit, "Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders for the Development of Novel Therapies" (DENOThe), Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Italy. 3. Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Careggi Hospital, Italy. 4. Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy. 5. Andrology Unit, "Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders for the Development of Novel Therapies" (DENOThe), Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Italy. 6. Endocrine Unit, "Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders for the Development of Novel Therapies" (DENOThe), Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.peri@unifi.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality observed in clinical practice. Several studies have demonstrated that hyponatremia is associated with an increased length of hospital stay and of hospital resource utilization. To clarify the impact of hyponatremia on the length of hospitalization and costs, we performed a meta-analysis based on published studies that compared hospital length of stay and cost between patients with and without hyponatremia. METHODS: An extensive Medline, Embase, and Cochrane search was performed to retrieve all studies published up to April 1, 2015 using the following words: "hyponatremia" or "hyponatraemia" AND "hospitalization" or "hospitalisation." A meta-analysis was performed including all studies comparing duration of hospitalization and hospital readmission rate in subjects with and without hyponatremia. RESULTS: Of 444 retrieved articles, 46 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 3,940,042 patients; among these, 757,763 (19.2%) were hyponatremic. Across all studies, hyponatremia was associated with a significantly longer duration of hospitalization (3.30 [2.90-3.71; 95% CIs] mean days; P < .000). Similar results were obtained when patients with associated morbidities were analyzed separately. Furthermore, hyponatremic patients had a higher risk of readmission after the first hospitalization (odds ratio 1.32 [1.18-1.48; 95% CIs]; P < .000). A meta-regression analysis showed that the hyponatremia-related length of hospital stay was higher in males (Slope = 0.09 [0.05-0.12; 95% CIs]; P = .000 and Intercept = -1.36 [-3.03-0.32; 95% CIs]; P = .11) and in elderly patients (Slope = 0.002 [0.001-0.003; 95% CIs]; P < .000 and Intercept = 0.89 [0.83-0.97; 95% CIs]; P < .001). A negative association between serum [Na(+)] cutoff and duration of hospitalization was detected. No association between duration of hospitalization, serum [Na(+)], and associated morbidities was observed. Finally, when only US studies (n = 8) were considered, hyponatremia was associated with up to around $3000 higher hospital costs/patient when compared with the cost of normonatremic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms that hyponatremia is associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay and higher risk of readmission. These observations suggest that hyponatremia may represent one important determinant of the hospitalization costs.
BACKGROUND:Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality observed in clinical practice. Several studies have demonstrated that hyponatremia is associated with an increased length of hospital stay and of hospital resource utilization. To clarify the impact of hyponatremia on the length of hospitalization and costs, we performed a meta-analysis based on published studies that compared hospital length of stay and cost between patients with and without hyponatremia. METHODS: An extensive Medline, Embase, and Cochrane search was performed to retrieve all studies published up to April 1, 2015 using the following words: "hyponatremia" or "hyponatraemia" AND "hospitalization" or "hospitalisation." A meta-analysis was performed including all studies comparing duration of hospitalization and hospital readmission rate in subjects with and without hyponatremia. RESULTS: Of 444 retrieved articles, 46 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 3,940,042 patients; among these, 757,763 (19.2%) were hyponatremic. Across all studies, hyponatremia was associated with a significantly longer duration of hospitalization (3.30 [2.90-3.71; 95% CIs] mean days; P < .000). Similar results were obtained when patients with associated morbidities were analyzed separately. Furthermore, hyponatremic patients had a higher risk of readmission after the first hospitalization (odds ratio 1.32 [1.18-1.48; 95% CIs]; P < .000). A meta-regression analysis showed that the hyponatremia-related length of hospital stay was higher in males (Slope = 0.09 [0.05-0.12; 95% CIs]; P = .000 and Intercept = -1.36 [-3.03-0.32; 95% CIs]; P = .11) and in elderly patients (Slope = 0.002 [0.001-0.003; 95% CIs]; P < .000 and Intercept = 0.89 [0.83-0.97; 95% CIs]; P < .001). A negative association between serum [Na(+)] cutoff and duration of hospitalization was detected. No association between duration of hospitalization, serum [Na(+)], and associated morbidities was observed. Finally, when only US studies (n = 8) were considered, hyponatremia was associated with up to around $3000 higher hospital costs/patient when compared with the cost of normonatremic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms that hyponatremia is associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay and higher risk of readmission. These observations suggest that hyponatremia may represent one important determinant of the hospitalization costs.
Authors: E Sbardella; A M Isidori; G Arnaldi; M Arosio; C Barone; A Benso; R Berardi; G Capasso; M Caprio; F Ceccato; G Corona; S Della Casa; L De Nicola; M Faustini-Fustini; E Fiaccadori; L Gesualdo; S Gori; A Lania; G Mantovani; P Menè; G Parenti; C Pinto; R Pivonello; P Razzore; G Regolisti; C Scaroni; F Trepiccione; A Lenzi; A Peri Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Saleem Al Mawed; V Shane Pankratz; Kelly Chong; Matthew Sandoval; Maria-Eleni Roumelioti; Mark Unruh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240