Literature DB >> 27059320

The temporal dynamics of reversal learning: P3 amplitude predicts valence-specific behavioral adjustment.

Kayla R Donaldson1, Belel Ait Oumeziane2, Sebastien Hélie1, Dan Foti1.   

Abstract

Adapting behavior to dynamic stimulus-reward contingences is a core feature of reversal learning and a capacity thought to be critical to socio-emotional behavior. Impairment in reversal learning has been linked to multiple psychiatric outcomes, including depression, Parkinson's disorder, and substance abuse. A recent influential study introduced an innovative laboratory reversal-learning paradigm capable of disentangling the roles of feedback valence and expectancy. Here, we sought to use this paradigm in order to examine the time-course of reward and punishment learning using event-related potentials among a large, representative sample (N=101). Three distinct phases of processing were examined: initial feedback evaluation (reward positivity, or RewP), allocation of attention (P3), and sustained processing (late positive potential, or LPP). Results indicate a differential pattern of valence and expectancy across these processing stages: the RewP was uniquely related to valence (i.e., positive vs. negative feedback), the P3 was uniquely associated with expectancy (i.e., unexpected vs. expected feedback), and the LPP was sensitive to both valence and expectancy (i.e., main effects of each, but no interaction). The link between ERP amplitudes and behavioral performance was strongest for the P3, and this association was valence-specific. Overall, these findings highlight the potential utility of the P3 as a neural marker for feedback processing in reversal-based learning and establish a foundation for future research in clinical populations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; Flexibility; Punishment; Reversal-learning; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059320      PMCID: PMC5426362          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  40 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ventral striatum response during reward and punishment reversal learning in unmedicated major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Oliver J Robinson; Roshan Cools; Christina O Carlisi; Barbara J Sahakian; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Rachel Swainson; Lucy Durham; Laura Benham; Roshan Cools
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

6.  The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: electroencephalographic evidence of task-set inertia in oculomotor control.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Cameron D Hassall; Olave E Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Feedback-related negativity codes outcome valence, but not outcome expectancy, during reversal learning.

Authors:  A K L von Borries; R J Verkes; B H Bulten; R Cools; E R A de Bruijn
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  L-DOPA disrupts activity in the nucleus accumbens during reversal learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Simon J G Lewis; Luke Clark; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Neural Patterns of the Implicit Association Test.

Authors:  Graham F Healy; Lorraine Boran; Alan F Smeaton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kelley; James E Glazer; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Dynamic modulation of neural feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Celina Pütz; Berry van den Berg; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  The time course of reactivity to social acceptance and rejection feedback: An examination of event-related potentials and behavioral measures in a peer interaction task.

Authors:  Samantha Pegg; Marisa N Lytle; Kodi B Arfer; Autumn Kujawa
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.348

4.  Feedback-Related Electroencephalogram Oscillations of Athletes With High and Low Sports Anxiety.

Authors:  Hiroaki Masaki; Takahiro Hirao; Yuya Maruo; Dan Foti; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-28

5.  Reward processing electrophysiology in schizophrenia: Effects of age and illness phase.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Brian J Roach; Clay B Holroyd; Martin P Paulus; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon; Susanna L Fryer
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Changes of Attention during Value-Based Reversal Learning Are Tracked by N2pc and Feedback-Related Negativity.

Authors:  Mariann Oemisch; Marcus R Watson; Thilo Womelsdorf; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.