Literature DB >> 27058997

Framing obesity in UK policy from the Blair years, 1997-2015: the persistence of individualistic approaches despite overwhelming evidence of societal and economic factors, and the need for collective responsibility.

Stanley J Ulijaszek1, Amy K McLennan1.   

Abstract

Since 1997, and despite several political changes, obesity policy in the UK has overwhelmingly framed obesity as a problem of individual responsibility. Reports, policies and interventions have emphasized that it is the responsibility of individual consumers to make personal changes to reduce obesity. The Foresight Report 'Tackling Obesities: Future Choices' (2007) attempted to reframe obesity as a complex problem that required multiple sites of intervention well beyond the range of personal responsibility. This framing formed the basis for policy and coincided with increasing acknowledgement of the complex nature of obesity in obesity research. Yet policy and interventions developed following Foresight, such as the Change4Life social marketing campaign, targeted individual consumer behaviour. With the Conservative-Liberal Democrat government of 2011, intervention shifted to corporate and individual responsibility, making corporations voluntarily responsible for motivating individual consumers to change. This article examines shifts in the framing of obesity from a problem of individual responsibility, towards collective responsibility, and back to the individual in UK government reports, policies and interventions between 1997 and 2015. We show that UK obesity policies reflect the landscape of policymakers, advisors, political pressures and values, as much as, if not more than, the landscape of evidence. The view that the individual should be the central site for obesity prevention and intervention has remained central to the political framing of population-level obesity, despite strong evidence contrary to this. Power dynamics in obesity governance processes have remained unchallenged by the UK government, and individualistic framing of obesity policy continues to offer the path of least resistance.
© 2016 World Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumption; UK; individualism; obesity policy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27058997     DOI: 10.1111/obr.12386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between monetary delay discounting and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Jianjun Tang; Oliver J Chrzanowski-Smith; George Hutchinson; Frank Kee; Ruth F Hunter
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition.

Authors:  Phillip Baker; Corinna Hawkes; Kate Wingrove; Alessandro Rhyl Demaio; Justin Parkhurst; Anne Marie Thow; Helen Walls
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-02-10

3.  The 'who' and 'what' of #diabetes on Twitter.

Authors:  Mariano Beguerisse-Díaz; Amy K McLennan; Guillermo Garduño-Hernández; Mauricio Barahona; Stanley J Ulijaszek
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-01-01

4.  Monitoring the 'diabetes epidemic': A framing analysis of United Kingdom print news 1993-2013.

Authors:  Kristen Foley; Darlene McNaughton; Paul Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Is Obesity Policy in England Fit for Purpose? Analysis of Government Strategies and Policies, 1992-2020.

Authors:  Dolly R Z Theis; Martin White
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  The impact of COVID-19 on the eating habits of families engaged in a healthy eating pilot trial: a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Lucy Porter; Jennifer S Cox; Kim A Wright; Natalia S Lawrence; Fiona B Gillison
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-27

7.  Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.

Authors:  Clara Gómez-Donoso; Gary Sacks; Lana Vanderlee; David Hammond; Christine M White; Claudia Nieto; Maira Bes-Rastrollo; Adrian J Cameron
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Bringing disgust in through the backdoor in healthy food promotion: a phenomenological perspective.

Authors:  Bas de Boer; Mailin Lemke
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.