| Literature DB >> 27057740 |
Philip G Murray1,2, Imogen Butcher1,2, Warwick B Dunn1,3,4, Adam Stevens1,2, Reena Perchard1,2, Daniel Hanson1,2, Andrew Whatmore1,2, Melissa Westwood1,5, Peter E Clayton1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Later life metabolic dysfunction is a well-recognized consequence of being born small for gestational age (SGA). This study has applied metabolomics to identify whether there are changes in these pathways in prepubertal short SGA children and aimed to compare the intracellular and extracellular metabolome in fibroblasts derived from healthy children and SGA children with postnatal growth impairment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27057740 PMCID: PMC4939268 DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.72
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Res ISSN: 0031-3998 Impact factor: 3.756
Metabolites up- or down-regulated comparing the metabolic fingerprint and metabolic footprint from SGA fibroblasts (n=8) to control cells (n=3). The fold change is calculated as median-SGA/median-control.
| Metabolite | Ratio | p-value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine | 0.33 | 0.014 | Fingerprint |
| Threonine | 1.25 | 0.041 | Fingerprint |
| Glutamic acid | 1.39 | 0.025 | Fingerprint |
| Ornithine | 1.44 | 0.014 | Fingerprint |
| Citric acid | 1.53 | 0.041 | Fingerprint |
| Serine | 1.65 | 0.014 | Fingerprint |
| Fructose | 1.8 | 0.014 | Fingerprint |
| Aspartic acid | 5.21 | 0.014 | Fingerprint |
| Alanine | 0.19 | 0.014 | Footprint |
| Cysteine | 0.32 | 0.014 | Footprint |
| 2-methyl-3-hydroxybutanoic acid | 0.53 | 0.049 | Footprint |
| 3-methylpentanoic acid | 0.54 | 0.014 | Footprint |
| Hexanoic acid | 0.58 | 0.041 | Footprint |
| Phenylalalnine | 0.65 | 0.025 | Footprint |
| Aminomalonic acid | 0.71 | 0.041 | Footprint |
| Trimethylamine-N-oxide | 1.18 | 0.025 | Footprint |
| Phosphate | 1.26 | 0.041 | Footprint |
| Pyruvic acid | 1.42 | 0.025 | Footprint |
| Cystine | 1.66 | 0.025 | Footprint |
Metabolic pathways enrichment analysis using the metabolic fingerprint and metabolic footprint metabolites identified as significantly up-/down-regulated between control and SGA cells.
| Pathway name | Number of | FDR (q-value) | Metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanoamino acid metabolism | 3 | 0.0074 | glycine, serine, alanine |
| Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 4 | 0.0093 | threonione, glycine, serine, pyruvate |
| Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | 3 | 0.0129 | glutamine, asparate, pyruvate |
| Methane metabolism | 3 | 0.0291 | trimethylamine-N-oxide, glycine, serine |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 3 | 0.0362 | phenylalanine, glutamine, glycine |
Figure 1Interaction network of differences in metabolite regulation between control and SGA patient cell lines
Nineteen metabolites were identified as differentially regulated between control and patient cells; these were used to define a network with inferred protein and metabolite interactions (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis Software [IPA]). Predicted activity in the network was calculated by derivation from the findings within the Ingenuity Knowledge Base (IKB) database between the unknown molecule and its known neighbours (Molecule Activity Predictor [MAP] in IPA). Purple highlight indicates involvement with insulin signalling (13/44).
Figure 2Biological functions associated with differences in metabolite regulation between control and SGA patient cell lines
Biological functions ranked by p-value of Fisher’s exact test (negative log).
Figure 3Phospho-kinase activation after stimulation with IGF-I in control and SGA patient cells
In control but not SGA cells IGF-I preferentially activates ERK2 and JNK2 while in SGA but not control cells RSK2 is activated. *p>0.05 for difference between the IGF-I stimulated phospho-kinase activation (shown on graph) and baseline phospho-kinase activity (not shown). Black bars = SGA, Grey bars = Control.
Age, Gender, Height SDS and aetiology of growth impairment
| Patient No | Age at | Gender | Birthweight | Gestational | Mode of | Age at | Height | Weight | Height | Evidence of | Molecular |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.4 | F | 640 | 27 | C-section | 5.0 | −4.5 | −6.0 | −0.43 | No | Unidentified |
| 2 | 4.7 | M | 1880 | 38 | C-section | 4.8 | −2.5 | −4.4 | −1.0 | Yes | Unidentified |
| 3 | 4.5 | F | 1077 | 34 | C-section | 4.7 | −2.3 | −3.5 | −3.5 | Yes – twin | Unidentified |
| 4 | 0.7 | M | 1757 | 36 | C-section | 4.4 | −3.3 | −2.2 | −0.3 | Yes with | Russell Silver |
| 5 | 1.7 | M | 2140 | 38 | Spontaneous | 1.8 | −5.8 | −4.3 | −0.7 | Yes | CUL7 c.4191delC |
| 6 | 2.8 | F | 2380 | 40 | Spontaneous | 7.9 | −3.5 | −3.5 | −2.0 | No | OBSL1 |
| 7 | 3.2 | M | 1927 | 37 | Spontaneous | 10.3 | −4.9 | −5.2 | −2.1 | No | OBSL1 |
| 8 | 4.1 | F | 2409 | 38 | C-section | 5.8 | −3.3 | −4.6 | −2.1 | Yes | CCDC8 c.84dup, |