Literature DB >> 15623308

Closed-loop, multiobjective optimization of analytical instrumentation: gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the metabolomes of human serum and of yeast fermentations.

Steve O'Hagan1, Warwick B Dunn, Marie Brown, Joshua D Knowles, Douglas B Kell.   

Abstract

The number of instrumental parameters controlling modern analytical apparatus can be substantial, and varying them systematically to optimize a particular chromatographic separation, for example, is out of the question because of the astronomical number of combinations that are possible (i.e., the "search space" is very large). However, heuristic methods, such as those based on evolutionary computing, can be used to explore such search spaces efficiently. We here describe the implementation of an entirely automated (closed-loop) strategy for doing this and apply it to the optimization of gas chromatographic separations of the metabolomes of human serum and of yeast fermentation broths. Without human intervention, the Robot Chromatographer system (i) initializes the settings on the instrument, (ii) controls the analytical run, (iii) extracts the variables defining the analytical performance (specifically the number of peaks, signal/noise ratio, and run time), (iv) chooses (via the PESA-II multiobjective genetic algorithm), and (v) programs the next series of instrumental settings, the whole continuing in an iterative cycle until suitable sets of optimal conditions have been established. Genetic programming was used to remove noise peaks and to establish the basis for the improvements observed. The system showed that the number of peaks observable depended enormously on the conditions used and served to increase them by as much as 3-fold (e.g., to over 950 in human serum) while in many cases maintaining or reducing the run time and preserving excellent signal/noise ratios. The evolutionary closed-loop machine learning strategy we describe is generic to any type of analytical optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15623308     DOI: 10.1021/ac049146x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  21 in total

1.  Automated refinement and inference of analytical models for metabolic networks.

Authors:  Michael D Schmidt; Ravishankar R Vallabhajosyula; Jerry W Jenkins; Jonathan E Hood; Abhishek S Soni; John P Wikswo; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Development of tissue-targeted metabonomics. Part 1. Analytical considerations.

Authors:  Kristin E Price; Craig E Lunte; Cynthia K Larive
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 3.  Optimizing Mass Spectrometry Analyses: A Tailored Review on the Utility of Design of Experiments.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Hecht; Ann L Oberg; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Biomarker discovery in animal health and disease: the application of post-genomic technologies.

Authors:  Rowan E Moore; Jennifer Kirwan; Mary K Doherty; Phillip D Whitfield
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-07-10

5.  Inter-laboratory reproducibility of fast gas chromatography-electron impact-time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-EI-TOF/MS) based plant metabolomics.

Authors:  J William Allwood; Alexander Erban; Sjaak de Koning; Warwick B Dunn; Alexander Luedemann; Arjen Lommen; Lorraine Kay; Ralf Löscher; Joachim Kopka; Royston Goodacre
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 6.  Towards a unifying, systems biology understanding of large-scale cellular death and destruction caused by poorly liganded iron: Parkinson's, Huntington's, Alzheimer's, prions, bactericides, chemical toxicology and others as examples.

Authors:  Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Quantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: status and perspectives.

Authors:  Maud M Koek; Renger H Jellema; Jan van der Greef; Albert C Tas; Thomas Hankemeier
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.290

8.  Efficient discovery of anti-inflammatory small-molecule combinations using evolutionary computing.

Authors:  Ben G Small; Barry W McColl; Richard Allmendinger; Jürgen Pahle; Gloria López-Castejón; Nancy J Rothwell; Joshua Knowles; Pedro Mendes; David Brough; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 15.040

9.  Scientific discovery as a combinatorial optimisation problem: how best to navigate the landscape of possible experiments?

Authors:  Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Exploiting genomic knowledge in optimising molecular breeding programmes: algorithms from evolutionary computing.

Authors:  Steve O'Hagan; Joshua Knowles; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.