Literature DB >> 27056290

Visibility of Anterolateral Ligament Tears in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees With Standard 1.5-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

David E Hartigan1, Kevin W Carroll2, Frank J Kosarek2, Dana P Piasecki3, James F Fleischli3, Donald F D'Alessandro3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To attempt to visualize the ligament with standard 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-torn knee, and if it is visible, attempt to characterize it as torn or intact at its femoral, meniscal, and tibial attachment sites.
METHODS: This was a retrospective MRI study based on arthroscopic findings of a known ACL tear in 72 patients between the years 2006 and 2010. Patients all had hamstring ACL reconstructions, no concomitant lateral collateral ligament, or posterolateral corner injury based on imaging and physical examination, and had a preoperative 1.5-tesla MRI scan with standard sequences performed within 3 weeks of the injury. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed the preoperative MRI for visualization of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) for concomitant tears. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated. Learning effect was analyzed to determine if radiologists' agreement improved as reads progressed.
RESULTS: Both radiologists were able to visualize the ALL in 100% of the scans. Overall, ALL tears were noted in 26% by radiologist 1 and in 62% by radiologist 2. The agreement between the ligament being torn or not had a kappa of 0.54 between radiologists. The agreements in torn or not torn between radiologists in the femoral, meniscal, and tibial sites were 0.14, 0.15, and 0.31. The intraobserver reliability by radiologist 1 for femoral, meniscal, and tibial tears was 0.04, 0.57, and 0.54 respectively. For radiologist 2, they were 0.75, 0.61, and 0.55. There was no learning effect noted.
CONCLUSIONS: ALL tears are currently unable to be reliably identified as torn or intact on standard 1.5-tesla MRI sequences. Proper imaging sequences are of crucial importance to reliably follow these tears to determine their clinical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056290     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  15 in total

1.  The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the anterolateral ligament of the knee in association with anterior cruciate rupture.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kosy; Peter J Schranz; Anish Patel; Rahul Anaspure; Vipul I Mandalia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Identification of the Anterolateral Ligament on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Karan A Patel; Anikar Chhabra; Jill A Goodwin; David E Hartigan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Anterolateral ligament injuries in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament tear: Contribution of ultrasonography and MRI.

Authors:  Marie Faruch Bilfeld; Etienne Cavaignac; Karine Wytrykowski; Olivia Constans; Franck Lapègue; Hélène Chiavassa Gandois; Ahmed Larbi; Nicolas Sans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The role of the anterolateral ligament in knee's biomechanics: a case-control retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Castelli; Giacomo Zanon; Eugenio Jannelli; Alessandro Ivone; Enrico Ferranti Calderoni; Alberto Combi; Mario Mosconi; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-23

5.  Anterolateral ligament abnormalities are associated with peripheral ligament and osseous injuries in acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Paulo Victor Partezani Helito; Renata Vidal Leão; Marco Kawamura Demange; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The anterolateral complex in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees demonstrate sonographic abnormalities on high-resolution sonography.

Authors:  Masahito Yoshida; Elmar Herbst; Macio Albers; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Kentaro Onishi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Segond fracture: an MR evaluation of 146 patients with emphasis on the avulsed bone fragment and what attaches to it.

Authors:  Dyan V Flores; Edward Smitaman; Brady K Huang; Donald L Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee.

Authors:  Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Matthew Daggett; Jean-Marie Fayard; Andrea Ferretti; Camilo Partezani Helito; Martin Lind; Edoardo Monaco; Vitor Barion Castro de Pádua; Mathieu Thaunat; Adrian Wilson; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jacco Zijl; Steven Claes
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06

9.  Assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Volkan Kızılgöz; Ali Kemal Sivrioğlu; Hasan Aydın; Türkhun Çetin; Gökhan Ragıp Ulusoy
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  MRI Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: A Cross-Sectional Study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ren Yi Kow; Chooi Leng Low; Khairul Nizam Siron Baharom; Siti Nor Badriati Sheikh Said
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.