Literature DB >> 27056097

Seasonal variation of responses to herbivory and volatile communication in sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) (Asteraceae).

Satomi Ishizaki1, Kaori Shiojiri2, Richard Karban3, Masashi Ohara4.   

Abstract

Plants can respond to insect herbivory in various ways to avoid reductions in fitness. However, the effect of herbivory on plant performance can vary depending on the seasonal timing of herbivory. We investigated the effects of the seasonal timing of herbivory on the performance of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Sagebrush is known to induce systemic resistance by receiving volatiles emitted from clipped leaves of the same or neighboring plants, which is called volatile communication. Resistance to leaf herbivory is known to be induced most effectively after volatile communication in spring. We experimentally clipped 25 % of leaves of sagebrush in May when leaves were expanding, or in July when inflorescences were forming. We measured the growth and flower production of clipped plants and neighboring plants which were exposed to volatiles emitted from clipped plants. The treatment conducted in spring reduced the growth of clipped plants. This suggests that early season leaf herbivory is detrimental because it reduces the opportunities for resource acquisition after herbivory, resulting in strong induction of resistance in leaves. On the other hand, the late season treatment increased flower production in plants exposed to volatiles, which was caused mainly by the increase in the number of inflorescences. Because the late season treatment occurred when sagebrush produces inflorescences, sagebrush may respond to late herbivory by increasing compensation ability and/or resistance in inflorescences rather than in leaves. Our results suggest that sagebrush can change responses to herbivory and subsequent volatile communication seasonally and that the seasonal variation in responses may reduce the cost of induced resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Herbivory; Induced resistance; Optimal defense theory; Phenological differences; Tolerance; Volatile communication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056097     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-016-0818-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  13 in total

1.  The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses.

Authors:  Nancy Stamp
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 3.  The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton; Julia Koricheva
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Richard Karban
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Reproductive effort and herbivory timing in a perennial herb: fitness components at the individual and population levels.

Authors:  María B García; Johan Ehrlén
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize.

Authors:  Jurriaan Ton; Marco D'Alessandro; Violaine Jourdie; Gabor Jakab; Danielle Karlen; Matthias Held; Brigitte Mauch-Mani; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves.

Authors:  G Arimura; R Ozawa; T Shimoda; T Nishioka; W Boland; J Takabayashi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Kaori Shiojiri; Mikaela Huntzinger; Andrew C McCall
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush.

Authors:  R Karban; I T Baldwin; K J Baxter; G Laue; G W Felton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Ontogeny and season constrain the production of herbivore-inducible plant volatiles in the field.

Authors:  J Daniel Hare
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tradeoff between resistance induced by volatile communication and over-topping vertical growth.

Authors:  Richard Karban
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  More phylogenetically diverse polycultures inconsistently suppress insect herbivore populations.

Authors:  Angela M Coco; Eric C Yip; Ian Kaplan; John F Tooker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Herbivory Amplifies Adverse Effects of Drought on Seedling Recruitment in a Keystone Species of Western North American Rangelands.

Authors:  Mathew Geisler; Sven Buerki; Marcelo D Serpe
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.