Emanuel C Trabuco1, Patricia G Moorman, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Amy L Weaver, William A Cliby. 1. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and the Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and the Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of hysterectomy on ovarian function by comparing antimüllerian hormone, a marker of ovarian reserve, before and after hysterectomy. METHODS: The Prospective Research on Ovarian Function study prospectively followed 1) premenopausal women undergoing ovary-sparing hysterectomy for benign indications, and 2) a referent cohort with similar age distributions and intact reproductive organs; they reported that women undergoing hysterectomy became menopausal 1.9 years earlier than referents. In a planned secondary analysis, baseline antimüllerian hormone levels and the absolute change and percentage change in antimüllerian hormone levels between baseline and 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS: Baseline median antimüllerian hormone levels were similar between the hysterectomy group (n=148) and the referent group (n=172). After 1 year, patients undergoing hysterectomy had a significantly greater median percentage decrease (-40.7% compared with -20.9%; P<.001), had a higher proportion with undetectable antimüllerian hormone (12.8% compared with 4.7%; P=.02), and had on average 0.77 times the antimüllerian hormone level (P=.001) compared with referents. These differences were attenuated among white women but remained significant among black women. Comparisons of women stratified by low or high ovarian reserve at baseline or among propensity score-matched cohorts showed similar findings; however, the absolute median change in antimüllerian hormone levels was similar between groups (-0.3 compared with -0.2; P=.31). CONCLUSION: Women undergoing hysterectomy had similar antimüllerian hormone levels at baseline and experienced a greater percentage decrease in levels after 1 year compared with referents, suggesting that hysterectomy may lead to ovarian damage that is unrelated to baseline ovarian reserve.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of hysterectomy on ovarian function by comparing antimüllerian hormone, a marker of ovarian reserve, before and after hysterectomy. METHODS: The Prospective Research on Ovarian Function study prospectively followed 1) premenopausal women undergoing ovary-sparing hysterectomy for benign indications, and 2) a referent cohort with similar age distributions and intact reproductive organs; they reported that women undergoing hysterectomy became menopausal 1.9 years earlier than referents. In a planned secondary analysis, baseline antimüllerian hormone levels and the absolute change and percentage change in antimüllerian hormone levels between baseline and 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS: Baseline median antimüllerian hormone levels were similar between the hysterectomy group (n=148) and the referent group (n=172). After 1 year, patients undergoing hysterectomy had a significantly greater median percentage decrease (-40.7% compared with -20.9%; P<.001), had a higher proportion with undetectable antimüllerian hormone (12.8% compared with 4.7%; P=.02), and had on average 0.77 times the antimüllerian hormone level (P=.001) compared with referents. These differences were attenuated among white women but remained significant among black women. Comparisons of women stratified by low or high ovarian reserve at baseline or among propensity score-matched cohorts showed similar findings; however, the absolute median change in antimüllerian hormone levels was similar between groups (-0.3 compared with -0.2; P=.31). CONCLUSION:Women undergoing hysterectomy had similar antimüllerian hormone levels at baseline and experienced a greater percentage decrease in levels after 1 year compared with referents, suggesting that hysterectomy may lead to ovarian damage that is unrelated to baseline ovarian reserve.
Authors: Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Anisha Satish; Zaraq Khan; Carin Y Smith; Walter A Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart Journal: Menopause Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Koji Matsuo; Hiroko Machida; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Brendan H Grubbs; Lynda D Roman; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Zaraq Khan; Amy L Weaver; Carin Y Smith; Walter A Rocca; Elizabeth A Stewart Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kristen Upson; Clarice R Weinberg; Hazel B Nichols; Gregg E Dinse; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Dale P Sandler; Donna D Baird Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Tess V Clendenen; Wenzhen Ge; Karen L Koenig; Yelena Afanasyeva; Claudia Agnoli; Elizabeth Bertone-Johnson; Louise A Brinton; Farbod Darvishian; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Mengling Liu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 6.134