OBJECTIVE: Subjective memory concerns (SMCs) in healthy older adults are associated with future decline and can indicate preclinical dementia. However, SMCs may be multiply determined, and often correlate with affective or psychosocial variables rather than with performance on memory tests. Our objective was to identify sensitive and selective methods to disentangle the underlying causes of SMCs. METHOD: Because preclinical dementia pathology targets the hippocampus, we hypothesized that performance on hippocampally dependent relational memory tests would correlate with SMCs. We thus administered a series of memory tasks with varying dependence on relational memory processing to 91 older adults, along with questionnaires assessing depression, anxiety, and memory self-efficacy. We used correlational, regression, and mediation analyses to compare the variance in SMCs accounted for by these measures. RESULTS: Performance on the task most dependent on relational memory processing showed a stronger negative association with SMCs than did other memory performance metrics. SMCs were also negatively associated with memory self-efficacy. These 2 measures, along with age and education, accounted for 40% of the variance in SMCs. Self-efficacy and relational memory were uncorrelated and independent predictors of SMCs. Moreover, self-efficacy statistically mediated the relationship between SMCs and depression and anxiety, which can be detrimental to cognitive aging. CONCLUSIONS: These data identify multiple mechanisms that can contribute to SMCs, and suggest that SMCs can both cause and be caused by age-related cognitive decline. Relational memory measures may be effective assays of objective memory difficulties, while assessing self-efficacy could identify detrimental affective responses to cognitive aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Subjective memory concerns (SMCs) in healthy older adults are associated with future decline and can indicate preclinical dementia. However, SMCs may be multiply determined, and often correlate with affective or psychosocial variables rather than with performance on memory tests. Our objective was to identify sensitive and selective methods to disentangle the underlying causes of SMCs. METHOD: Because preclinical dementia pathology targets the hippocampus, we hypothesized that performance on hippocampally dependent relational memory tests would correlate with SMCs. We thus administered a series of memory tasks with varying dependence on relational memory processing to 91 older adults, along with questionnaires assessing depression, anxiety, and memory self-efficacy. We used correlational, regression, and mediation analyses to compare the variance in SMCs accounted for by these measures. RESULTS: Performance on the task most dependent on relational memory processing showed a stronger negative association with SMCs than did other memory performance metrics. SMCs were also negatively associated with memory self-efficacy. These 2 measures, along with age and education, accounted for 40% of the variance in SMCs. Self-efficacy and relational memory were uncorrelated and independent predictors of SMCs. Moreover, self-efficacy statistically mediated the relationship between SMCs and depression and anxiety, which can be detrimental to cognitive aging. CONCLUSIONS: These data identify multiple mechanisms that can contribute to SMCs, and suggest that SMCs can both cause and be caused by age-related cognitive decline. Relational memory measures may be effective assays of objective memory difficulties, while assessing self-efficacy could identify detrimental affective responses to cognitive aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Melissa J Slavin; Henry Brodaty; Nicole A Kochan; John D Crawford; Julian N Trollor; Brian Draper; Perminder S Sachdev Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Martine E M Mol; Robert A C Ruiter; Frans R J Verhey; Jeanette Dijkstra; Jelle Jolles Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Frank Jessen; Birgitt Wiese; Cadja Bachmann; Sandra Eifflaender-Gorfer; Franziska Haller; Heike Kölsch; Tobias Luck; Edelgard Mösch; Hendrik van den Bussche; Michael Wagner; Anja Wollny; Thomas Zimmermann; Michael Pentzek; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Heinz-Peter Romberg; Siegfried Weyerer; Hanna Kaduszkiewicz; Wolfgang Maier; Horst Bickel Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-04
Authors: A J Saykin; H A Wishart; L A Rabin; R B Santulli; L A Flashman; J D West; T L McHugh; A C Mamourian Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: R Stewart; C Dufouil; O Godin; K Ritchie; P Maillard; N Delcroix; F Crivello; B Mazoyer; C Tzourio Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: William S Kremen; Margie E Lachman; Jens C Pruessner; Martin Sliwinski; Robert S Wilson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kevin M Horecka; Michael R Dulas; Hillary Schwarb; Heather D Lucas; Melissa Duff; Neal J Cohen Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.899