Literature DB >> 2705426

Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification.

D A Savitz1, A E Barón.   

Abstract

Confounder misclassification is as pervasive a problem in epidemiologic studies as misclassification of the primary exposure variables. Adjustment using imperfectly classified confounders has been shown to remove only part of the confounding effect of that variable, most important when studying an exposure postulated to have a modest effect in the presence of a strong confounder. The Per Cent Adjustment (amount of confounding bias removed using the misclassified measure relative to the total confounding bias present) is derived for several case-control scenarios, and is found to have a stable relation to the sensitivity and specificity of confounder classification. Figures are provided for estimation of the completely adjusted odds ratio given the results from the misclassified proxy and an estimate of the extent of misclassification. This offers a method for quantitative assessment of the impact of residual confounding that results from confounder misclassification, illustrated with studies of coffee consumption and bladder cancer in the presence of confounding by cigarette smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2705426     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  27 in total

1.  Confounding in epidemiological studies: why "independent" effects may not be all they seem.

Authors:  G D Smith; A N Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-26

2.  Socioeconomic conditions and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-12

3.  Are hormonal contraceptive users more likely to misreport unprotected sex? Evidence from a biomarker validation study in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Sandra I McCoy; Lauren J Ralph; Nancy S Padian; Alexandra M Minnis
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-12

4.  How Confounder Strength Can Affect Allocation of Resources in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Kristine E Lynch; Brian W Whitcomb; Scott L DuVall
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2018-01-01

5.  Confounding in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  A N Phillips; G Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-09

6.  On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Can cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle explain the educational inequalities in mortality from ischaemic heart disease and from other heart diseases? 26 year follow up of 50,000 Norwegian men and women.

Authors:  Bjørn Heine Strand; Aage Tverdal
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Estimation using all available covariate information versus a fixed look-back window for dichotomous covariates.

Authors:  Steven M Brunelli; Joshua J Gagne; Krista F Huybrechts; Shirley V Wang; Amanda R Patrick; Kenneth J Rothman; John D Seeger
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Medical databases in studies of drug teratogenicity: methodological issues.

Authors:  Vera Ehrenstein; Henrik T Sørensen; Leiv S Bakketeig; Lars Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  The issue of confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  M J Strickland; M Klein; L A Darrow; W D Flanders; A Correa; M Marcus; P E Tolbert
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.