Literature DB >> 27054079

Identification and conformational analysis of putative microRNAs in Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

C Shruthi Sureshan1, S K M Habeeb1.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small RNAs, evolutionarily conserved endogenous non-coding RNAs that regulate their target mRNA expression by either inactivating or degrading mRNA genes; thus playing an important role in the growth and development of an organism. Maruca vitrata is an insect pest of leguminous plants like pigeon pea, cowpea and mung bean and is pantropical. In this study, we perform BLAST on all known miRNAs against the transcriptome data of M. vitrata and thirteen miRNAs were identified. These miRNAs were characterised and their target genes were identified using TargetScan and were functionally annotated using FlyBase. The importance of the structure of pre-miRNA in the Drosha activity led to study the backbone torsion angles of predicted pre-miRNAs (mvi-miR-9751, mvi-miR-649-3p, mvi-miR-4057 and mvi-miR-1271) to identify various nucleotide triplets that contribute to the variation of torsion angle values at various structural motifs of a pre-miRNA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maruca vitrata; MicroRNA; Precursor microRNA; Torsion angle; Transcriptome

Year:  2015        PMID: 27054079      PMCID: PMC4803788          DOI: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Transl Genom        ISSN: 2212-0661


Introduction

Insect infestation on a crop leads to loss in yield and quality, and then the insect becomes agricultural pest. The legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (lepidopteran) is one of the serious pest of grain legumes in the tropics and sub-tropics (Sharma, 1998); and they are known to affect overall production by causing damage to pigeon pea (Gopali et al., 2010), mung bean (Zahid et al., 2008) and cowpea (Asante et al., 2001). In Bangladesh, the damage caused by pod borer was estimated to be 54.4% in cowpea during harvest (K. O and M.Z. A., 1989). Reports from Taiwan show a yield loss of 17–53% of cowpea due to the pod borer infestation (Liao and Lin, 2000). Larvae web around the leaves and inflorescence before boring, and this prevents the pesticide penetration into the larval nest. Hence, control of this pest becomes challenging and there is a need for better control measures and strategies. Identification of various entomopathogenic fungus and parasitoids associated with M. vitrata is an effective method to kill or disable the insect (Mehinto et al., 2014, Dannon et al., 2010). Artificial miRNAs (amiRNAs) mediated gene silencing is turning into a potent tool in functional genomics, to control gene expression. They can be further utilized to study metabolic pathway and gene functions in various disciplines, and even to enhance favourable traits in plants (Tiwari et al., 2014, Cantó-Pastor et al., 2015). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of ~ 21 nt, endogenous non-coding RNA, that regulate target mRNA by cleaving or translation repression (Bartel, 2004). They play significant roles like developmental timing, cell differentiation and proliferation, tumorigenesis, host–pathogen interactions, ageing and viral replication (Ambros, 2012, Shivdasani, 2006, Gong et al., 2012, Asgari, 2011, Drummond et al., 2011). The structure of a pri-miRNA consists of a long imperfect stem structure of ~ 30 bp with flanking single-stranded RNA segments at its base. Maturation of miRNA begins when pri-miRNA is cleaved with an RNase enzyme III named Drosha (Lee et al., 2003) to release an ~ 60–70 nucleotide stem-loop intermediate known as the precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA). The pre-miRNA is transported to cytoplasm where RNase III enzyme called Dicer cleaves it to generate mature miRNA (Flores-jasso et al., 2009). The incorporation of the mature miRNA (guide strand) into the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) triggers the recognition of target mRNA and inactivates or degrades it. Stem-loop hairpin structure is an important feature of pre-miRNA in the computational identification of miRNA genes and in the biogenesis of miRNA (Krol and Krzyzosiak, 2004). The variation in the length of mature miRNA depends on the manner the enzyme Dicer cleaves the pre-miRNA, which in turn depends on the structural motifs like terminal loops, internal loops, and bulges present in the pre-miRNA. Terminal loop plays a major role in the cleaving action of Drosha and Dicer on the pre-miRNA (Starega-Roslan et al., 2011). As M. vitrata is an important pest, identifying miRNAs present in this lepidopteran will be practical in order to mediate gene silencing and transgenesis studies. Torsion angle is a critical factor to be analysed while examining various DNA/RNA motifs and conformations. The conformation of the backbone of DNA/RNA is defined by torsion angles — α, β, γ, δ, ε, and ζ. And the orientation of a base relative to sugar is given by torsion angle χ and there is a correlation between the angles — α ↔ γ and ε ↔ ζ (Saenger, 1983). The torsion angle studies had been applied to DNA Holliday Junction structure (Eichman et al., 2002), α/γ transitions in B-DNA backbone (Djuranovic et al., 2002), conformational classification of RNA (Schneider et al., 2004) and structural modifications in histones (Sanli et al., 2011). Analysis of torsion angles determines the irregularities in a structure. Every backbone torsion angle consists of certain range of values that maintains the integrity of the structure. Deviation from these values distorts the structure and hence its function (Temiz et al., 2012). In this study, we have investigated the fluctuations imposed on torsion angles with the variations observed in the sequence of miRNAs (Svozil et al., 2008). Existing transcriptome data were used to identify and characterise the putative miRNAs in M. vitrata; in order to predict target genes for the predicted miRNA and functionally annotate them using TargetScan and FlyBase respectively; and also to study the sequence dependant variations in backbone torsion angles in predicted miRNAs.

Materials and method

Data collection and identification of putative miRNA and their precursor

The transcriptome data of M. vitrata was retrieved from Sequence Read Archive, NCBI. The complete collection of miRNAs was downloaded from miRBase (Griffiths-Jones et al., 2006). The transcriptome data was processed to generate contigs and remove redundant sequences, and only the non-homologue sequences were used for further analysis. The collected miRNA sequences were used as query for homologous search against the transcriptome data, using standalone BLAST + 2.2.28 programme (Altschul et al., 1997).The hits obtained were considered as the candidates for finding precursor miRNAs. These sequences were submitted to Mfold to predict the secondary structures of precursor miRNAs (Zuker, 2003). The secondary structures were predicted based on criteria determined by Zhang et al. (2006): The pre-miRNA could be able to fold into a typical hairpin secondary structure. The mature miRNA should be located in the stem region of the hairpin structure. miRNA has less than seven mismatches with the complementary sequence in the opposite arm. No loops or breaks are allowed in the miRNA or miRNA*duplex. The negative MFE of the miRNA should be greater than − 18 kcal/mol and the (A + U) content must be in the range of 40–70%. The predicted miRNAs were named in accordance with the rules determined in the miRBase (Griffiths-Jones et al., 2006).

Predicting targets of miRNA

The target genes of the predicted miRNAs were identified using TargetScan (Lewis et al., 2003). TargetScan predict targets of miRNAs by searching for the presence of conserved sites that match the seed region of miRNA. The target genes obtained are then directed to the FlyBase database (Dos Santos et al., 2014), which assist in the functional annotation.

Predicting three dimensional structure of miRNA and torsion angle analysis

The three dimensional structure of mvi-miR-9751, mvi-miR-6497-3p, mvi-miR-4057 and mvi-miR-1271was constructed using MC-Sym (Parisien and Major, 2008), which provides a fully automated 3D structure from the user defined secondary structure (in Vienna format) and the sequence of microRNA in study. The PDB files created for the four predicted miRNAs were used to generate the torsion angle data using Curves + (Lavery et al., 2009). Graphs were generated to analyse torsion angle data (.lis file).

Results and discussion

In this study, 13 miRNAs were identified in the insect M. vitrata from the transcriptome data.

Characterisation of miRNA

All the predicted miRNAs have a typical stem-loop structure. The mature miRNAs were located either in 5′ arm (62%) or the 3′ arm (38%) of the stem loop structure. The secondary structures of all the predicted miRNAs are given in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

The secondary structures of putative miRNAs: The secondary structure consists of a stem and loop structures. The highlighted regions represent the mature microRNA in the hairpin structure.

The length of mature miRNAs varies from 19 to 22 nucleotides and the length of pre-miRNAs varied from 55 to 96 nucleotides. Tables 1 and 2 show the details of precursor miRNAs and predicted mature miRNAs respectively.
Table 1

Details of predicted precursor miRNAs.

miRNAmiRNA sequenceMFEE valueA + U content
mvi-miR-6497-3p*CGGAAGGCCGGAACGCGGGUCCGGAUUCUGCCCCGCAACGCCCCGAGAGACGAGCGUGGCGUCCACCAGGCCCGGCACCGGCCGCAUCCG− 38.50.00124.44
mvi-miR-6497-3pAGCGGAUGCGGCCGGUGCCGGGCCUGGUGGACGCCACGCUCGUCUCUCGGGACGUUGCGGGGCAGAAUCCGGACCCGCGUUCCGGCCUUCCG− 51.20.00126.08
mvi-miR-4171-5pUAUGACUCUCUUAAGGUAGCCAAAUGCCUCGUCAUCUAAUUAGUGACGCGCAUGAAUGGAUUAACGAGAUUCCC− 16.70.00356.75
mvi-miR-466m-3pGUGCAUGUGGAUGUGUGUAUGUAUUUGUAUGAGUGAAUAUAUGGUUAUGUGUGUAUGUGUGCGUGUGGAUGU− 19.40.00461.11
mvi-miR-4057GUCGGUGCAGAUCUUGGUGGUAGUAGCAAAUACUCCAGCGAGGCCCUGGAGGACUGA− 17.90.00443.85
mvi-miR-1271GCCACGAUGAUUGCUUAGCAGGUGCCAAGGAGGCGGCUGCCGACAGUUUCUGGGU− 21.70.00440
mvi-miR-15b-3pUGUGCCUUGGCAGUCUCAGUUUGUAGUUGCUCACAGUUUGGCAGAAGCGAAUAAAGCAGCAACUAAUGAUUAUAACCGGCGCG− 20.80.00453.01
mvi-miR-414UUGUGACGAUGAUGAUGAGGAUGCGAUGAGGCCCGGCACGCAGUCGUUGUGCUCAGCAGAAGUGCAUGUCCUUGAAGGUCUUCUUGUCCUUGUAGA− 25.40.00447.91
mvi-miR-35b-3pGGCAACUACUACGUUCCCGGUGAAGCUAAACUGGCUUUCGUCAUCCGUAUCCGUGGUAUCAACCAGGUCUCA− 17.40.00448.61
mvi-miR-6497-5pUUGGCUCUGAGGACCGGGGCGUGUCGGGUUAAGACGACAAAAAAAGAAAACAAAAACAAAUGUCGGCCGCUGAGACUGCCAAGGCACACAGGGG− 24.22.00E − 0546.8
mvi-miR-2966GGCCCCGUCCCGGUCCCGUCCCGUUACCUUACGUUAAGGUAACGGUACGUCCGUAACCGGAAC− 26.32.00E − 0438.09
mvi-miR-9751CGUUUUAGGGUUUAGGUUUAAAAGGUUAAAAGUUAAAAAAAUUUUUAAAAAAUUUUUAAAUUUAGUCCGAAAAAACGUUU− 164.00E − 0480
mvi-miR-4968-3pUUCCUCAGAAUAUAGUGUUACUGAUCCUGAGCUUUCAGGAAAUCCUGGCUAAAGCAACAGCAGCAGCAGCAAACAAGAAGAAGAGGA− 22.88.00E − 0456.32
Table 2

Details of predicted mature miRNAs.

miRNAContig/singletStart positionEnd positionStrandmiRNA sequence
mvi-miR-6497-3p*17684754953′AGGCCCGGCACCGGCCGCAUC
mvi-miR-6497-3p5241331535′GAUGCGGCCGGUGCCGGGCCU
mvi-miR-4171-5p56763225′UGACUCUCUUAAGGUAGCCA
mvi-miR-466m-3p51304504715′UACAUACACACAUCCACAUGCA
mvi-miR-405740133323115′UUUGCUACUACCACCAAGAUCU
mvi-miR-12719715685475′CUUGGCACCUGCUAAGCAAUCA
mvi-miR-15b-3p534693743′AAUCAUUAGUUGCUGCUUUA
mvi-miR-41434427467275′CAUCCUCAUCAUCAUCGUCA
mvi-miR-35b-3p47143473285′UCACCGGGAACGUAGUAGUU
mvi-miR-6497-5pFTWC1V114IJAVH3673885′GCUCUGAGGACCGGGGCGUGUC
mvi-miR-2966FTWC1V113H8JH65705515′CCCGUCCCGGUCCCGUCCCG
mvi-miR-9751FTWC1V112HKXA02902715′UUUUAAACCUAAACCCUAAA
mvi-miR-4968-3pFTWC1V116JP5XD1611793′AGCAACAGCAGCAGCAGCA
Minimum free energy (MFE) calculated for the predicted miRNAs varied from − 51.2 to − 16 kcal/mol (Das, 2010). The A + U content for the predicted pre-miRNA varied from 24 to 80% (Asokan et al., 2013).

Identification of miRNA targets

In animals, the miRNA and microRNA Response Element (MRE) are almost never completely complementary to each other. The “seed” region which constitutes roughly 6–8 nucleotides of the 5′-end generally suffices the functional RISC formation (Brennecke et al., 2005). But recent studies prove that seed target regions at the 3′-end are conserved and thus demonstrating the predominant regulatory functions of miRNAs through 3′ UTRs (Gu et al., 2007, Friedman et al., 2009). In the current study, we have used 3′ UTR sequence data of Drosophila melanogaster in the TargetScan to confirm our targets (Table 3).
Table 3

Target mRNAs for the predicted miRNAs and their functional annotations.

miRNATarget geneSymbolFunction
mvi-miR-6497-3p*FBgn0035746CG17742Identical protein binding
FBgn0000359CG1478Structural constituent of chorion
FBgn0004177CG7109Protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity
mvi-miR-6497-3pFBgn0034100CG15709Intracellular cyclic nucleotide activated cation channel activity
FBgn0013733CG18076Protein binding
mvi-miR-4171-5pFBgn0003031CG5119mRNA 3′-UTR binding
FBgn0010452CG11280Unknown
FBgn0033989CG7639Unknown
mvi-miR-466m-3pFBgn0013974CG42636Guanylate cyclase activity
FBgn0003892CG2411Hedgehog receptor activity
FBgn0020245CG10117Protein binding
FBgn0024277CG18214Rho guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity
FBgn0034451CG11242Unknown
FBgn0000036CG5610Acetylcholine-activated cation-selective channel activity
FBgn0000037mAcR-60CG-protein coupled acetylcholine receptor activity
FBgn0000439CG2189Activating transcription factor binding
FBgn0001122CG2204GTP binding
mvi-miR-4057FBgn0000286CG11924DNA binding
FBgn0033494CG33135Voltage-gated cation channel activity
FBgn0000497CG17941Cadherin binding; calcium ion binding
FBgn0003380CG12348Voltage-gated cation channel activity
FBgn0003520CG5753mRNA 3′-UTR binding
FBgn0004198CG11387Transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding
FBgn0004889CG6235Protein phosphatase type 2A regulator activity
FBgn0005638CG4354RNA polymerase II regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding
FBgn0010453CG4698Frizzled binding
FBgn0013342CG17248Protein binding; SNAP receptor activity; SNARE binding
FBgn0015286CG2849GTPase activity; PDZ domain binding
FBgn0015797CG6601GTPase activity
FBgn0022131CG42783Myosin binding; protein serine/threonine kinase activity
FBgn0026616CG4606Mannosyl-oligosaccharide 1,2-alpha-mannosidase activity
FBgn0034476CG8595Neurotrophin receptor activity; virion binding
FBgn0035167CG13888Sweet taste receptor activity
FBgn0035895CG7015mRNA 3′-UTR binding
FBgn0036862CG9619Protein phosphatase 1 binding
FBgn0038587CG7998Malate dehydrogenase activity
FBgn0039054CG13830Wnt-protein binding
FBgn0041092CG13109Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor transcription coactivator activity; steroid hormone receptor binding
mvi-miR-1271FBgn0052062CG32062Transcription factor binding
FBgn0011674CG11312Cytoskeletal adaptor activity
FBgn0038165CG9637Potassium channel activity; protein heterodimerization activity
FBgn0000119CG5912Wnt-activated receptor activity
FBgn0053517CG33517Dopamine neurotransmitter receptor activity
FBgn0038874CG5911Ecdysis-triggering hormone receptor activity
FBgn0038818CG4058Metalloendopeptidase activity
FBgn0004370CG1817Protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
FBgn0004514CG7485G-protein coupled amine receptor activity
FBgn0024273CG1520Actin binding
mvi-miR-15b-3pFBgn0001145CG1743Glutamate-ammonia ligase activity
FBgn0026375CG32555Rho GTPase activator activity; semaphorin receptor binding
FBgn0086783CG17927Actin-dependent ATPase activity; protein homodimerization activity; structural constituent of muscle
FBgn0001085CG17697Wnt-activated receptor activity
FBgn0001235CG17117Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
FBgn0003525CG1395Protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
FBgn0036757CG14585Extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity; olfactory receptor activity
FBgn0003502CG8049Protein tyrosine kinase activity
FBgn0003710CG1232Sodium channel regulator activity
FBgn0004103CG5650Myosin phosphatase activity; protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity
FBgn0004598CG18734Serine-type endopeptidase activity
FBgn0263111CG43368Voltage-gated calcium channel activity
FBgn0010453CG4698Frizzled binding
FBgn0013995CG5685Calcium:sodium antiporter activity
FBgn0015797CG6601GTPase activity
FBgn0030366CG1490Ubiquitin-specific protease activity
mvi-miR-414FBgn0000359CG1478Structural constituent of chorion
FBgn0021764CG5227Unknown
mvi-miR-35b-3pFBgn0000360CG11213Structural constituent of chorion
FBgn0039674CG1907Oxoglutarate:malate antiporter activity; transmembrane transporter activity
FBgn0250910CG42244Octopamine receptor activity
mvi-miR-6497-5pFBgn0004636CG1956GTPase activity
FBgn0031530CG3254Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase activity
mvi-miR-2966FBgn0025625CG4290Protein kinase activity
FBgn0032419CG17217Unknown
mvi-miR-9751FBgn0003415CG9936RNA polymerase II transcription cofactor activity
FBgn0037351CG1475Structural constituent of ribosome
FBgn0037834CG6554Histone methyltransferase activity (H4-R3 specific); protein-arginine omega-N asymmetric methyltransferase activity
FBgn0000448CG33183Ligand-activated sequence-specific DNA binding RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity; protein binding
FBgn0015806CG10539Ribosomal protein S6 kinase activity
FBgn0032480CG5682Unfolded protein binding
FBgn0063499CG17522Glutathione transferase activity
FBgn0010280CG5444RNA polymerase II core promoter sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in preinitiation complex assembly
FBgn0041092CG13109Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor transcription coactivator activity; steroid hormone receptor binding
FBgn0000097CG3166Protein binding; RNA polymerase II distal enhancer sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
FBgn0000247CG31037Rab GTPase binding; Rab guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity
FBgn0000253CG8472Calcium ion binding; myosin heavy chain binding; myosin V binding
FBgn0000283CG6384Chromatin insulator sequence binding; DNA binding; microtubule binding; POZ domain binding;
FBgn0003137CG33103Extracellular matrix structural constituent
FBgn0003410CG9949Protein binding; protein self-association
FBgn0003892CG2411Hedgehog receptor activity; lipoprotein particle receptor activity
FBgn0003944CG10388DNA binding; protein binding; protein domain specific binding; RNA polymerase II distal enhancer sequence-specific DNA binding
FBgn0004168CG16720Serotonin receptor activity
FBgn0004242CG3139Calcium-dependent phospholipid binding; phosphatidylserine binding; protein homodimerization activity; SNARE binding
FBgn0005631CG13521Heparin binding; protein binding
FBgn0011217CG7425Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme activity; ubiquitin protein ligase activity; ubiquitin protein ligase binding
FBgn0015790CG5771GTPase activity; protein binding; protein complex binding
FBgn0262872CG43227Myosin binding
FBgn0026391CG16961Olfactory receptor activity
FBgn0028875CG32975Acetylcholine binding
FBgn0028996CG1922RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription
FBgn0264386CG15899Low voltage-gated calcium channel activity
FBgn0034691CG6562Inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatase activity
FBgn0036373CG10741Transcription coactivator binding; transcription factor binding
FBgn0037950CG14723Histamine-gated chloride channel activity
FBgn0001233CG1242Unfolded protein binding
FBgn0002917CG1517Cation channel activity
FBgn0261606CG15442Structural constituent of ribosome
FBgn0011224CG31000mRNA 3′-UTR binding; translation repressor activity, nucleic acid binding
FBgn0011225CG5695Actin binding; actin filament binding; calmodulin binding; microtubule binding; myosin light chain binding
FBgn0013467CG18285Calmodulin binding
mvi-miR-4968-3pFBgn0001122CG2204GTP binding
FBgn0003721CG4898Actin filament binding
FBgn0011656CG1429RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity involved in positive regulation of transcription
FBgn0259162CG42267ATP binding
FBgn0042083CG3267CoA carboxylase activity
FBgn0259227CG42327Protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
FBgn0002441CG5954Chromatin insulator sequence binding
FBgn0002932CG11988Phosphatidylinositol phosphate binding; protein binding; ubiquitin protein ligase activity
FBgn0261873CG32717Protein binding
FBgn0004364CG8896Transmembrane signalling receptor activity
FBgn0003423CG1417Proline dehydrogenase activity
FBgn0004636CG1956GTPase activity; protein binding
FBgn0010516CG8996Electron carrier activity; flavin adenine dinucleotide binding
FBgn0264855CG4260Protein transporter activity
FBgn0020309CG14938Metal ion binding; nucleic acid binding
FBgn0027844CG7820Carbonate dehydratase activity; zinc ion binding
FBgn0031432CG9964Electron carrier activity
FBgn0264815CG440073′,5′-Cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activity
FBgn0033095CG3409Monocarboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity
FBgn0033317CG8635Metal ion binding
FBgn0033460CG1472Signal sequence binding; transporter activity; zinc ion binding
FBgn0033609CG13213SAM domain binding
FBgn0034967CG3186Ribosome binding
FBgn0035357CG1244Chromatin binding; nucleosome-dependent ATPase activity; protein binding
FBgn0035914CG6282Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors
FBgn0036005CG3428Contributes to ubiquitin–protein transferase activity
FBgn0036816CG3979Citrate transmembrane transporter activity; succinate transmembrane transporter activity
FBgn0050286CG30286Serine-type endopeptidase activity
FBgn0259176CG42281Protein homodimerization activity; sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
FBgn0038153CG14376Ligand-gated ion channel activity
FBgn0052654CG32654Ras GTPase binding

Functional annotation

A total of 141 targets were obtained for 13 miRNAs encoding for metamorphosis, cell signalling, transcription regulation, structural constituents, metabolism, and transmembrane transportation. Thus it proves the multi-level functioning of miRNAs in various molecular and cellular processes. mRNAs targeted by mvi-miR-466m-3p and mvi-miR-1271 are associated with Hedgehog receptor activity and Ecdysis-triggering hormone receptor activity which are linked to metamorphosis. mvi-miR-9751 was seen to target genes mainly associated with transcription regulation, which is accomplished by sequence specific DNA binding proteins, RNA polymerase II transcription cofactor and histone methyltransferase activity. Further, mvi-miR-9751 also controlled the genes specific to GTPase activity and serotonin activity, which are integral to various signalling pathways. Similarly mvi-miR-4968-3p was found to be associated with transcription regulating proteins as well as signalling molecules (Ras GTPase binding). mvi-miR-6497-3p* targets mRNAs linked to structural constituents of chorion (the outer shell of the insect egg) along with the protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity. Apart from mvi-miR-6497-3p*, structural constituents of chorion are also targeted by mvi-miR-414 and mvi-miR-35b-3p. mvi-miR-1271 and mvi-miR-4968-3p regulate the genes related to structural constituents of cytoskeleton.

Target multiplicity and cooperativity

Multiplicity is one of the common characteristics of miRNA regulation, such that one 3′ UTR has more than one MREs and thus assisting miRNA in having multiple targets (Ghosh et al., 2007). In our study we identified mvi-miR-9751 to have maximum plausible target mRNAs responsible for transcription regulation and signalling pathways. Cooperativity is another feature shown by miRNA, where more than one miRNAs regulate a target mRNA, thus establishing an effective silencing (Ghosh et al., 2007). In our study we found that mvi-miR-6497-3p* and mvi-miR-35b-3p participate in the regulation of the gene FBgn0000359 (structure of chorion).

Torsion angle analysis

In order to study the fluctuations observed in torsion angle with respect to the variation in sequences, the structure of mvi-miR-9751 was divided into one loop, three stem sections and one internal loop. Similarly, one loop, five stem sections, one bulge and one internal loop in mvi-miR-649-3p; two stem sections and one internal loop for mvi-miR-4057; one external loop, two stem sections, one bulge and one loop for mvi-miR-1271 were noted down for the analysis. The four torsion angles, α, γ, ε and ζ have shown deviation from their usual range of values. Similar to DNA sequences, miRNA has relationship between the torsion angles (Saenger, 1983): Alpha (α) and gamma (γ) Epsilon (ε) and zeta (ζ). Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5 shows the relationships and deviations observed in the torsion angles in mvi-miR-9751, mvi-miR-649-3p, mvi-miR-4057 and mvi-miR-1271 respectively. Table 4, Table 5 shows the maximum and minimum values of α, γ, ε and ζ torsion angles in the stems, loops, internal loops and bulge regions of the two miRNAs.
Fig. 2

Variation in α, γ, ϵ and ζ of mvi-miR-9751.

Fig. 3

Variation in α, γ, ϵ and ζ of mvi-miR-6497-3p.

Fig. 4

Variation in α, γ, ϵ and ζ of mvi-miR-4057.

Fig. 5

Variation in α, γ, ϵ and ζ of mvi-miR-1271.

Table 4

α and γ torsion angle deviations in the predicted microRNAs.

R—region; S—stem; IL—internal loop; B—bulge; EL—external loop; L—loop; POS—base position; ϕ—torsion angle value; 3plet—triplets. The coloured cells represent the torsion angle values that have deviated from the Klyne and Prelog cycle. Violet colour represents the highest deviation value and the orange colour represents the lowest deviation value.

Table 5

ϵ and ζ torsion angle deviations in the predicted microRNAs.

R—region; S—stem; IL—internal loop; B—bulge; EL—external loop; L—loop; POS—base position; ϕ—torsion angle value; 3plet—triplets. The coloured cells represent the torsion angle values that have deviated from the Klyne and Prelog cycle. Violet colour represents the highest deviation value and the orange colour represents the lowest deviation value.

Deviation of alpha and gamma torsion angles

In general the values of α torsion angles for RNA is specific to the − gauche region (− 30° to − 90°) of the Klyne and Prelog cycle. Most of the nucleotides have been found to be in this region, with few exceptions. There were deviations from the − sc to − ac, − ap, + ap, + ac and + sc regions. Majority of them were found to be in − ac and − ap regions. For the most part, this variation has been observed in nucleotides — C and G. The usual range of γ torsion angles for RNA is + gauche (30° to 90°) of the Klyne and Prelog cycle. All the four microRNA sequences have shown a predominant deviation to + ac, − ac, − ap and + ap regions. Overall, both α and γ values were found to be in similar ranges with respect to various studies (Schneider et al., 2004).

Deviation of epsilon and zeta torsion angles

The normal range of ϵ torsion angle has been mainly recorded to be in the − ac (− 90° to − 150°) region (Schneider et al., 2004). But apart from this region, the + ap and − sc regions are also allowed if the ribose sugar exhibits C3′ endo- and C3′ exo-puckering respectively. It was noted that most of the nucleotides in our miRNAs had ϵ torsion angles that have occupied a different region other than − ac. The epsilon values have shifted to the − ap and + sc regions. As a result of C3′ endo-puckering, G43 (mvi-miR-4051), G50 and U56 (mvi-miR-6497-3p) displayed values in the − sc region, similarly, due to C3′ exo-puckering C5 of mvi-miR-1271 showed values in the + ap region. The ζ values are generally depicted in the − gauche (− 30° to − 90°) region and some cases to the − ap region too. Our study showed deviations from this range of values in some of the nucleotides. The torsion angle mostly shifted to − ac and + ac, and a few were found to be in + sp and − sp regions.

Nucleotides showing deviation in torsion angles

The torsion angle values under the study have shown to deviate with respect to changes in nucleotide sequence (Svozil et al., 2008). Among all the four nucleotide, G and C have induced the most deviation in torsion angle (Arrigo et al., 2012). The values of torsion angles fluctuated with respect to certain patterns of nucleotide sequence and these patterns were termed as “nucleotide triplets” (Table 6).
Table 6

Triplets and their deviation from torsion angles.

TripletsRegionAlphaGammaEpsilonZeta
CCGStem− 97.593.5− 155.6− 23
GGUStem86.6− 142.5− 157.2− 17.5
GUUStem− 131.4119.0− 122.8− 91.8
GGGStem133.3− 91.4160.0− 2.1
CCAStem− 127.3112.7− 129.584.5
UGCInternal loop166.3159.2− 141.3− 68.1
GGAInternal loop− 49.152.1− 161.6− 94.3
AAALoop33.0− 166.4− 171.7− 98.8
AGGLoop127.8− 153.0− 159.3− 85.4
ACGBulge82.07.4− 81.9− 48.9
Also, when a bulge occurs in the stem region of a miRNA, it leads to variation in torsion angle (Kumar et al., 2012, Popenda et al., 2008). Hence it is concluded that sequence composition can affect various structural motifs present in a pre-miRNA. This can help in understanding the sequence dependant modulations occurring in the cleaving of pri-miRNA by Drosha to synthesis pre-miRNA (Krol and Krzyzosiak, 2004, Starega-Roslan et al., 2011). Studies have shown that the size, location and the distribution of terminal loops and internal loops can affect the cleavage by Dicer. Therefore a shift in the cleavage sites of the enzymes Drosha and Dicer can result in the formation of isomiRs (isoforms of mature miRNAs) (Fernandez-Valverde et al., 2010, Neilsen et al., 2012). The outcome of this study can be implemented to investigate the effect of sequence variation in miRNAs and the resulting conformational changes observed during the binding of miRNAs to the RISC.

Conclusion

In the current study we identified thirteen putative miRNAs from M. vitrata. These miRNAs regulate mRNAs related to metamorphosis, cell signalling, transcription regulation, structural constituents, metabolism, and transmembrane transportation. miRNAs identified in the pest M. vitrata can be the initial step for an effective pest management programme. Backbone torsion angles of precursor structures of mvi-miR-9751, mvi-miR-6497-3p, mvi-miR-4057 and mvi-miR-1271 show that sequence composition can influence the stem-loop hairpin structure of pre-miRNAs. The presence of certain nucleotide triplets in structural motifs of miRNA can show substantial variation in the torsion angle values in these regions and affects the location of binding of enzymes. This work could be extended to study the sequence dependant variation in torsion angle during the binding of miRNAs to enzymes and RISC.
  34 in total

1.  Identification of 188 conserved maize microRNAs and their targets.

Authors:  Baohong Zhang; Xiaoping Pan; Todd A Anderson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  The MC-Fold and MC-Sym pipeline infers RNA structure from sequence data.

Authors:  Marc Parisien; François Major
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  IsomiRs--the overlooked repertoire in the dynamic microRNAome.

Authors:  Corine T Neilsen; Gregory J Goodall; Cameron P Bracken
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 4.  MicroRNAs and developmental timing.

Authors:  Victor Ambros
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Dynamic isomiR regulation in Drosophila development.

Authors:  Selene L Fernandez-Valverde; Ryan J Taft; John S Mattick
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Effects of volatiles from Maruca vitrata larvae and caterpillar-infested flowers of their host plant Vigna unguiculata on the foraging behavior of the parasitoid Apanteles taragamae.

Authors:  Elie A Dannon; Manuele Tamò; Arnold Van Huis; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing.

Authors:  Yoontae Lee; Chiyoung Ahn; Jinju Han; Hyounjeong Choi; Jaekwang Kim; Jeongbin Yim; Junho Lee; Patrick Provost; Olof Rådmark; Sunyoung Kim; V Narry Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets.

Authors:  Benjamin P Lewis; I-hung Shih; Matthew W Jones-Rhoades; David P Bartel; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves+.

Authors:  R Lavery; M Moakher; J H Maddocks; D Petkeviciute; K Zakrzewska
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Kinetics of bulge bases in small RNAs and the effect of pressure on it.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Jean Lehmann; Albert Libchaber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification and Characterization of Small Noncoding RNAs in Genome Sequences of the Edible Fungus Pleurotus ostreatus.

Authors:  Jibin Qu; Mengran Zhao; Tom Hsiang; Xiaoxing Feng; Jinxia Zhang; Chenyang Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Application of insulin signaling to predict insect growth rate in Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Authors:  Md Abdullah Al Baki; Jin Kyo Jung; Rameswor Maharjan; Hwijong Yi; Jeong Joon Ahn; Xiaojun Gu; Yonggyun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.