Hector A Cuello1, Valeria I Segatori1, Marina Alberto1, Analía Pesce2, Daniel F Alonso1, Mariano R Gabri3. 1. Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Science and Technology, Quilmes National University, R. Saenz Peña 352, Bernal, B1876BXD, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. PharmADN, mAbxience Co., Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Science and Technology, Quilmes National University, R. Saenz Peña 352, Bernal, B1876BXD, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mrgabri@unq.edu.ar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are described as biological products that resemble the structure of original biologic therapeutic products, with no clinically meaningful differences in terms of safety and effectiveness from the original. A wide range of biosimilars are under development or are already licensed in many countries. Biosimilars are earning acceptance and becoming a reality for immunotherapy treatments mainly based on the alternatives for the commercial anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. The most important mechanism of action reported for this antibody is the induction of antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is associated with the polymorphisms present at the 158 position in the IgG receptor FcγRIIIa. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to validate the functional comparability between the proposed rituximab biosimilar RTXM83 and the original product. To achieve this we assessed the binding capacity and ADCC induction of this biosimilar, taking into account the different FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms. METHODS: Binding capacity was evaluated by flow cytometry using CD20 positive cells and a wide range of antibody concentrations. The FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by allele-specific restriction enzyme digestion. ADCC was measured by a colorimetric lactate dehydrogenase-release assay, using effector cells from donors with different FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms. RESULTS: Binding capacity assay showed no differences between both products. Regarding ADCC, a similar relative potency was obtained between both antibodies, showing a higher response for the FcγRIIIa-158 valine/valine (V/V) polymorphism compared to the phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F), for both rituximab and RTXM83. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest the biocomparability between the proposed biosimilar and the originator rituximab, in antibody recognition and ADCC activity. Additionally, our results suggest that donors with the FcγRIIIa-158V/V polymorphism induce a higher ADCC response, as has been reported.
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are described as biological products that resemble the structure of original biologic therapeutic products, with no clinically meaningful differences in terms of safety and effectiveness from the original. A wide range of biosimilars are under development or are already licensed in many countries. Biosimilars are earning acceptance and becoming a reality for immunotherapy treatments mainly based on the alternatives for the commercial anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. The most important mechanism of action reported for this antibody is the induction of antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is associated with the polymorphisms present at the 158 position in the IgG receptor FcγRIIIa. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to validate the functional comparability between the proposed rituximab biosimilar RTXM83 and the original product. To achieve this we assessed the binding capacity and ADCC induction of this biosimilar, taking into account the different FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms. METHODS: Binding capacity was evaluated by flow cytometry using CD20 positive cells and a wide range of antibody concentrations. The FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by allele-specific restriction enzyme digestion. ADCC was measured by a colorimetric lactate dehydrogenase-release assay, using effector cells from donors with different FcγRIIIa-158 polymorphisms. RESULTS: Binding capacity assay showed no differences between both products. Regarding ADCC, a similar relative potency was obtained between both antibodies, showing a higher response for the FcγRIIIa-158 valine/valine (V/V) polymorphism compared to the phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F), for both rituximab and RTXM83. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest the biocomparability between the proposed biosimilar and the originator rituximab, in antibody recognition and ADCC activity. Additionally, our results suggest that donors with the FcγRIIIa-158V/V polymorphism induce a higher ADCC response, as has been reported.
Authors: Nohemi Salinas-Jazmín; Edith González-González; Luz X Vásquez-Bochm; Sonia M Pérez-Tapia; Marco A Velasco-Velázquez Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 1.355