Literature DB >> 27053291

Risk stratification using D-dimers in patients presenting to the emergency department with nonspecific complaints.

C H Nickel1, T Kuster2, C Keil2, A S Messmer2, N Geigy3, R Bingisser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonspecific complaints (NSC) such as generalized weakness present frequently to acute care settings. These patients are at risk of adverse health outcomes. The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis whether D-dimers are predictive for 30-day mortality in patients with NSCs.
METHODS: Delayed type cross-sectional diagnostic study with a 30-day follow-up period, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00920491). This study took place in 2 EDs in Northwestern Switzerland. Patients were enrolled in the study if they were over 18years of age, gave informed consent, and if they presented with NSCs such as generalized weakness. D-dimer levels were determined at ED presentation.
RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 524 patients. Median age was 82years (IQR=75 to 87years); 40.5% were men. There were 489 survivors and 35 non-survivors at 30-day follow-up. Twenty-one (60%) of the non-survivors were males. D-dimer levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (p<0.001). Univariate Cox regression models for D-dimer resulted in a C-index of 0.77 for prediction of mortality. A model including sex, age, Katz ADL and D-dimer in a multivariate Cox regression lead to a C-Index of 0.80.
CONCLUSION: D-dimer testing might be an effective risk stratification tool in patients with NSC by helping to identify patients at low risk of short-term mortality with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.121. The use of D-dimers for risk stratification in patients with NSC should be confirmed with prospective studies.
Copyright © 2016 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D-dimer; Geriatric; Mortality; Nonspecific complaints; TRIAGE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053291     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  4 in total

1.  Study protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study to identify predictors of adverse outcome in older medical emergency department patients (the Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department in Acutely Ill Older Patients (RISE UP) study).

Authors:  Noortje Zelis; Jacqueline Buijs; Peter W de Leeuw; Sander M J van Kuijk; Patricia M Stassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Value of biomarkers in predicting mortality in older medical emergency department patients: a Dutch prospective study.

Authors:  Noortje Zelis; Robin Hundscheid; Jacqueline Buijs; Peter W De Leeuw; Maarten Tm Raijmakers; Sander Mj van Kuijk; Patricia M Stassen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Diagnostic Value of Copeptin in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Alireza Abootalebi Ghahnavieh; Keihan Golshani; Mohammadsaleh Jafarpisheh; Milad Moaiednia; Mohammad Ali Memarzade; Asieh Maghami-Mehr
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2019-03

4.  Routine measurement of d-dimers on suspected SARS-CoV2-infected patients does not lead to significant increase in radiological investigations.

Authors:  Mikkel Brabrand; Søren Bie Bogh; Marianne Fløjstrup; John Kellett; Tim Cooksley; Christian H Nickel
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.397

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.