| Literature DB >> 27053057 |
Kousaku Ohno1, Atsuyuki Tomizawa1, Makoto Mizuno1, Joseph A Jakubowski2, Atsuhiro Sugidachi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of P2Y12 inhibition for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been established. However, the therapeutic effects on ischemic limb complications are less clear. Accordingly, we aimed to develop a novel murine model of thrombotic hindlimb ischemia to reflect that found in patients with PAD exhibiting ischemic limb symptoms. We further investigated the effects of P2Y12 deficiency and P2Y12 inhibition by prasugrel in this model. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: P2Y12; femoral artery thrombosis; gait abnormalities; limb ischemia; prasugrel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27053057 PMCID: PMC4859280 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Hindlimb blood flow and pathology in wild‐type (WT) and P2Y12‐deficient mice. Blood flow images of hindlimbs were captured by laser speckle imaging in WT and P2Y12‐deficient (KO) mice. Representative blood flow images and relative blood flow for before and 1 hour after arterial injury are shown in (A) and (B), respectively. The results of 2‐way ANOVA were as follows: Genotype: F (1, 16)=5.88, P=0.0275; Injury: F (1, 16)=52.02, P<0.0001; and Genotype × Injury interaction: F(1, 16)=8.82, P=0.0090. Typical Elastica van Gieson–stained images of the injured arteries are shown in (C). Scale bar, 100 μm. Thrombus area (D) and lumen stenosis (E) were measured morphometrically. Data are presented as mean±SE (n=5). **P<0.01 vs WT mice (Student t test). ## P<0.01 vs before the arterial injury (paired t test).
Figure 2Effects of prasugrel on injured hindlimb blood flow. Representative blood flow images at 1 hour after the arterial injury on Day 1 are shown in (A). Relative blood flow was calculated for each animal at each time point (B). Data are presented as the mean±SE (n=10). Before: before the arterial injury. Day 1: 1 hour after the arterial injury. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs control group (Student t test). †† P<0.01 vs control group (Dunnett's test).
Figure 3Effects of prasugrel on max contact area (A), swing phase duration (B), stance phase duration (C) and stride length (D) in mice with hindlimb injury. The gait parameters were measured by CatWalk and calculated as ratios (%) of the injured hindlimb value to the normal hindlimb value on Day −3 (pre) and on Days 3, 7, and 21 after the arterial injury. Data are presented as mean±SE (n=10). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs control group (Student t test). † P<0.05, †† P<0.01 vs control group (Dunnett's test).