| Literature DB >> 27050687 |
Paul D Adams1, Kathleen Aertgeerts2, Cary Bauer3, Jeffrey A Bell4, Helen M Berman5, Talapady N Bhat6, Jeff M Blaney7, Evan Bolton8, Gerard Bricogne9, David Brown10, Stephen K Burley11, David A Case12, Kirk L Clark13, Tom Darden14, Paul Emsley15, Victoria A Feher16, Zukang Feng5, Colin R Groom17, Seth F Harris7, Jorg Hendle18, Thomas Holder4, Andrzej Joachimiak19, Gerard J Kleywegt20, Tobias Krojer21, Joseph Marcotrigiano22, Alan E Mark23, John L Markley24, Matthew Miller25, Wladek Minor26, Gaetano T Montelione27, Garib Murshudov15, Atsushi Nakagawa28, Haruki Nakamura28, Anthony Nicholls14, Marc Nicklaus29, Robert T Nolte30, Anil K Padyana31, Catherine E Peishoff30, Susan Pieniazek32, Randy J Read33, Chenghua Shao34, Steven Sheriff35, Oliver Smart20, Stephen Soisson36, John Spurlino37, Terry Stouch38, Radka Svobodova39, Wolfram Tempel40, Thomas C Terwilliger41, Dale Tronrud42, Sameer Velankar20, Suzanna C Ward43, Gregory L Warren14, John D Westbrook5, Pamela Williams44, Huanwang Yang5, Jasmine Young5.
Abstract
Crystallographic studies of ligands bound to biological macromolecules (proteins and nucleic acids) represent an important source of information concerning drug-target interactions, providing atomic level insights into the physical chemistry of complex formation between macromolecules and ligands. Of the more than 115,000 entries extant in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive, ∼75% include at least one non-polymeric ligand. Ligand geometrical and stereochemical quality, the suitability of ligand models for in silico drug discovery and design, and the goodness-of-fit of ligand models to electron-density maps vary widely across the archive. We describe the proceedings and conclusions from the first Worldwide PDB/Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center/Drug Design Data Resource (wwPDB/CCDC/D3R) Ligand Validation Workshop held at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics at Rutgers University on July 30-31, 2015. Experts in protein crystallography from academe and industry came together with non-profit and for-profit software providers for crystallography and with experts in computational chemistry and data archiving to discuss and make recommendations on best practices, as framed by a series of questions central to structural studies of macromolecule-ligand complexes. What data concerning bound ligands should be archived in the PDB? How should the ligands be best represented? How should structural models of macromolecule-ligand complexes be validated? What supplementary information should accompany publications of structural studies of biological macromolecules? Consensus recommendations on best practices developed in response to each of these questions are provided, together with some details regarding implementation. Important issues addressed but not resolved at the workshop are also enumerated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27050687 PMCID: PMC5070601 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.02.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Structure ISSN: 0969-2126 Impact factor: 5.006