Literature DB >> 27049543

Translating Research for Health Policy Decisions: Is It Time for Researchers to Join Social Media?

Zachary F Meisel1, Sarah E Gollust, David Grande.   

Abstract

Identifying effective strategies to translate research evidence to policy is a national priority and a priority of the health policy research community. Multiple channels exist to disseminate, translate, and communicate research evidence. Some thought leaders have specifically advocated for researchers to play a direct role in research dissemination, particularly through social media. However, this view remains controversial. This Commentary explores the current state of and future opportunities and barriers for alternative avenues of policy-relevant research dissemination. The authors identify four intersecting realities influencing the manner in which the health research community views and adopts various approaches to research translation: (1) persistent gaps in evidence translation and knowledge transfer, particularly in the realm of health policy; (2) public demand for scholars to embrace new modes of research dissemination; (3) the rapid growth and reach of social media to disseminate information; and (4) skepticism and confusion within the academic community about how best to use social media to disseminate policy-relevant research. They conclude that while scholars will need to be engaged in evidence translation to inform health policy, they may be best served by connecting with trusted intermediaries and knowledge brokers to promote efficient use of the best available evidence to answer the most timely policy questions. Journals and universities may be well positioned to invest in this capacity to curate research evidence and disseminate it using social media and other technologies.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27049543     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jane W Seymour; Maximilian J Pany; Adeline Goss; Zachary F Meisel; David Grande
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR.

Authors:  Zubin Cyrus Shroff; Dena Javadi; Lucy Gilson; Rockie Kang; Abdul Ghaffar
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-11-09

Review 3.  Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists.

Authors:  Guillaume Fontaine; Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte; Andréane Lavallée; Tanya Mailhot; Geneviève Rouleau; Julien Bouix-Picasso; Anne Bourbonnais
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2019-09-03

4.  Improving knowledge translation for increased engagement and impact in healthcare.

Authors:  Kathy Eljiz; David Greenfield; Anne Hogden; Robyn Taylor; Nazlee Siddiqui; Maria Agaliotis; Marianna Milosavljevic
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-09

5.  Reframing organizations in the digital age: A qualitative study exploring institutional social media adoption involving emergency physicians and other researchers.

Authors:  Yusuf Yilmaz; Brandon Ruan; Priya Thomas; Victoria Tran; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-10-15

6.  Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Guillaume Fontaine; Andréane Lavallée; Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte; Julien Bouix-Picasso; Anne Bourbonnais
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.