Literature DB >> 2704898

Factorial designs in clinical trials: the effects of non-compliance and subadditivity.

E Brittain1, J Wittes.   

Abstract

Factorial designs in clinical trials allow for the study of several medical treatments simultaneously. This paper distinguishes among different types of settings in which factorial designs are useful. For the experiment that involves investigation of several new or untested therapies, we introduce a model that incorporates rates of non-compliance to therapy as well as various degrees of subadditivity of treatment effects. We compare the operating characteristics of the factorial under this model with those of competing designs and show that a modest negative interaction can considerably diminish the power to detect treatment effects in the factorial even in cases that have little power to detect this interaction. We urge, therefore, that designers of clinical trials with factorial layouts posit realistic estimates of interactions among treatments in order to assure adequate power to detect beneficial effects of treatment.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2704898     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Measurement of patient compliance and the interpretation of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  R Vander Stichele
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Two-by-Two Factorial Cancer Treatment Trials: Is Sufficient Attention Being Paid to Possible Interactions?

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Barriers to Building More Effective Treatments: Negative Interactions Amongst Smoking Intervention Components.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26

5.  Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Linda M Collins; Victor J Strecher; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Sample size requirements for separating out the effects of combination treatments: randomised controlled trials of combination therapy vs. standard treatment compared to factorial designs for patients with tuberculous meningitis.

Authors:  Marcel Wolbers; Dorothee Heemskerk; Tran Thi Hong Chau; Nguyen Thi Bich Yen; Maxine Caws; Jeremy Farrar; Jeremy Day
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: challenges, methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Decision Making for Healthcare Resource Allocation: Joint v. Separate Decisions on Interacting Interventions.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Partial factorial trials: comparing methods for statistical analysis and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Helen A Dakin; Alastair M Gray; Graeme S MacLennan; Richard W Morris; David W Murray
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Which interactions matter in economic evaluations? A systematic review and simulation study.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Alastair Gray
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.