| Literature DB >> 27048322 |
Irmak Baran1,2, Neriman Aksu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterobacteriaceae are among the most common pathogens that are responsible for serious community-acquired, hospital-acquired, and health-care associated infections. The emergence and spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have become an increasing concern for healthcare services worldwide. Infections caused by these bacteria have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality and treatment options have been limited. The rapid and accurate detection of carbapenem resistance in these bacteria is important for infection control. The aim of this study was to investigate the phenotypic and genotypic features of CRE strains isolated in a tertiary-level reference hospital in Turkey.Entities:
Keywords: Carbapenem resistance; Enterobacteriaceae; Modified Hodge test; Multidrug resistance; Multiplex PCR; NDM-1; OXA-48; VIM
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27048322 PMCID: PMC4822248 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-016-0136-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Species and specimen distribution of 181 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
| Species | Specimen type (n) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | Urine | Wound | Trachael aspirate | Abscess | Catheter | Pleural fluid | Other* | Total | |
|
| 18 | 25 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 69 | |
|
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33 | |||
|
| 2 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 17 | |||
|
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 17 | ||||
|
| 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 13 | |||
|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 13 | |||
|
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |||
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Total | 59 | 49 | 31 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 181 |
*Bile, sputum, rectal swab, peritoneal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid
Distribution of positive carbapenemase gene loci according to bacteria types
| Genes | Type of bacteria n (%) | Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| OXA-48 | 52 (75.36) | 5 (15.15) | 3 (17.65) | 6 (35.29) | 8 (61.54) | 3 (23.08) | 5 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 86 (47.51) |
| NDM-1 | 5 (7.25) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (7.69) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (3.31) |
| VIM | 1 (1.45) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.55) |
Distribution of MEM-MHT, ERT-MHT results according to carbapenem- resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates
| Total number | Number of MEM-MHT (+) isolates | Number of MEM-MHT (−) isolates | Number of ERT-MHT(+) isolates | Number of ERT-MHT(−) isolates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All isolates | 181 | 110 | 71 | 109 | 72 |
| OXA-48 positive isolates | 86 | 78 | 8 | 77 | 9 |
|
| 69 | 56 | 13 | 55 | 14 |
| OXA-48 positive | 52 | 50 | 2 | 51 | 1 |
|
| 33 | 10 | 23 | 6 | 27 |
| OXA-48 positive | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
|
| 17 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| OXA-48 positive | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 17 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 7 |
| OXA-48 positive | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
|
| 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 3 |
| OXA-48 positive | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
|
| 13 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| OXA-48 positive | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| OXA-48 positive | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| OXA-48 positive | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| OXA-48 positive | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| OXA-48 positive | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| OXA-48 positive | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
MEM-MHT modified Hodge test with meropenem, ERT-MHT modified Hodge test with ertapenem
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value of MEM-MHT, ERT-MHT and correlation with OXA-48 gene positivity
| Sensitivity % | Specificity % | NPV % | PPV % | Correlation with OXA-48 gene positivity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All OXA-48 positive isolates | MEM-MHT | 70.9 | 88.7 | 66.3 | 90.7 | p < 0.001 |
| ERT-MHT | 70.6 | 87.5 | 66.3 | 89.5 | p < 0.001 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 89.3 | 84.6 | 64.7 | 96.2 | p < 0.001 |
| ERT-MHT | 92.7 | 92.9 | 76.5 | 98.1 | p < 0.001 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 20 | 86.9 | 71.4 | 40 | p > 0.05 |
| ERT-MHT | 16.7 | 85.2 | 82.1 | 20 | p > 0.05 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 37.5 | 100 | 64.3 | 100 | p > 0.05 |
| ERT-MHT | 33.3 | 100 | 57.1 | 100 | p > 0.05 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 44.4 | 75 | 54.6 | 66.7 | p > 0.05 |
| ERT-MHT | 40 | 71.4 | 45.5 | 66.7 | p > 0.05 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | p < 0.001 |
| ERT-MHT | 80 | 100 | 60 | 100 | p < 0.05 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 37.5 | 100 | 50 | 100 | p > 0.05 |
| ERT-MHT | 37.5 | 100 | 50 | 100 | p > 0.05 | |
| OXA-48 positive | MEM-MHT | 71.43 | 100 | 60 | 100 | p > 0.05 |
| ERT-MHT | 71.43 | 100 | 60 | 100 | p > 0.05 |
MEM-MHT modified Hodge test with meropenem, ERT-MHT modified Hodge test with ertapenem, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
Antibiotic resistance rates of most commonly isolated carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae species in our study
| Species | Antibiotic resistance rate (%) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | AMC | TZP | CXM | CAE | FOX | CAZ | CRO | FEP | ERT | IPM | MEM | AMK | GEN | CIP | CST | SXT | |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 88.41 | 88.41 | 85.51 | 86.96 | 86.96 | 86.96 | 100 | 92.75 | 78.26 | 46.38 | 63.77 | 78.26 | 14.49 | 55.07 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 30.30 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 30.30 | 100 | 6.06 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 3.03 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 52.94 | 100 | 100 | 52.94 | 58.82 | 41.18 | 58.82 | 0 | 100 | 11.76 | 17.65 | 11.76 | 29.41 | 100 | 47.06 |
|
| 52.94 | 29.41 | 17.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.53 | 0 | 17.65 | 0 | 100 | 5.88 | 0 | 29.41 | 35.29 | 100 | 41.18 |
|
| 100 | 92.31 | 92.31 | 92.31 | 84.62 | 76.92 | 69.23 | 76.92 | 76.92 | 84.62 | 84.62 | 76.92 | 15.38 | 53.85 | 61.54 | 7.69 | 61.54 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 69.23 | 76.92 | 100 | 100 | 61.54 | 61.54 | 38.46 | 84.62 | 92.31 | 61.54 | 30.77 | 61.54 | 61.54 | 7.96 | 53.85 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 40 | 30 | 0 | 50 | 90 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
AMC amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, AMK amikacin, AMP ampicillin, CAE cefuroxime-axetil, CAZ ceftazidime, CIP ciprofloxacin, CRO ceftriaxone, CST colistin, CXM cefuroxime, ERT ertapenem, FEP cefepime, FOX cefoxitin, GEN gentamicin, IPM imipenem, MEM meropenem, SXT trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TZP piperacillin-tazobactam