Literature DB >> 22993175

Laboratory detection of Enterobacteriaceae that produce carbapenemases.

Diana Doyle1, Gisele Peirano, Christine Lascols, Tracie Lloyd, Deirdre L Church, Johann D D Pitout.   

Abstract

A study was designed to evaluate the modified Hodge test (MHT), Mastdiscs ID inhibitor combination disks (MDI), Rosco Diagnostica Neo-Sensitabs (RDS), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) Etest, and in-house multiplex PCR for the detection of well-characterized carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. One hundred forty-two nonrepeat clinical isolates of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (including Klebsiella spp., Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Enterobacter spp.) obtained from the SMART worldwide surveillance program during 2008 to 2009 were included. These included 49 KPC-, 27 NDM-, 19 VIM-, 14 OXA-48-like enzyme-, and 5 IMP-producing isolates and 28 carbapenem-resistant, carbapenemase-negative isolates. The manufacturer's instructions were followed for MDI, RDS, and MBL Etest and CLSI guidelines for MHT. A multiplex PCR was designed to detect KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 93% for MDI, 80% and 93% for RDS, 58% and 93% for MHT, and 55% and 100% for MBL Etest, respectively. The PCR had 100% sensitivity and specificity. MDI and RDS performed well for the detection of KPCs and NDMs but poorly for VIMs, IMPs, and OXA-48-like enzymes. MHT performed well for KPCs and OXA-48-like enzymes but poorly for NDMs, VIMs, and IMPs. MDI and RDS were easy to perform and interpret but lacked sensitivity for OXA-48-like enzymes, VIMs, and IMPs. MHT and MBL Etest were often difficult to interpret. We recommend using molecular tests for the optimal detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22993175      PMCID: PMC3503014          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02117-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

Review 1.  The beta-lactamase threat in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Neil Woodford
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  David L Paterson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from intra-abdominal infections and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates.

Authors:  Stephen P Hawser; Samuel K Bouchillon; Christine Lascols; Meredith Hackel; Daryl J Hoban; Robert E Badal; Neil Woodford; David M Livermore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of a DNA microarray (Check-MDR CT102) for rapid detection of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases and of KPC, OXA-48, VIM, IMP, and NDM-1 carbapenemases.

Authors:  Thierry Naas; Gaelle Cuzon; Pierre Bogaerts; Youri Glupczynski; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Timothy R Walsh; Vincent Cuvillier; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-beta-lactamases in a large centralized laboratory.

Authors:  Johann D D Pitout; Daniel B Gregson; Laurent Poirel; Jo-Ann McClure; Phillip Le; Deirdre L Church
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Characteristics of NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli isolates that belong to the successful and virulent clone ST131.

Authors:  Gisele Peirano; Paul C Schreckenberger; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase, KPC-1, from a carbapenem-resistant strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  H Yigit; A M Queenan; G J Anderson; A Domenech-Sanchez; J W Biddle; C D Steward; S Alberti; K Bush; F C Tenover
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  OXA-48-like carbapenemases: the phantom menace.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Anaïs Potron; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase from traveler returning to Canada.

Authors:  Gisele Peirano; Jasmine Ahmed-Bentley; Neil Woodford; Johann D Pitout
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  105 in total

1.  Genomic epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Italy and novel insights into the origin and global evolution of its resistance to carbapenem antibiotics.

Authors:  Stefano Gaiarsa; Francesco Comandatore; Paolo Gaibani; Marta Corbella; Claudia Dalla Valle; Sara Epis; Erika Scaltriti; Edoardo Carretto; Claudio Farina; Maria Labonia; Maria Paola Landini; Stefano Pongolini; Vittorio Sambri; Claudio Bandi; Piero Marone; Davide Sassera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of Two Phenotypic Screening Tests for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Alix Pantel; Dimitri Souzy; Albert Sotto; Jean-Philippe Lavigne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of the CLSI Carba NP and the Rosco Carb Screen Assays Using North American Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

Authors:  Lauren C Gallagher; Sylvester S Roundtree; Diana P Lancaster; Susan D Rudin; Jennifer Dien Bard; Amity L Roberts; Steven H Marshall; Robert A Bonomo; Kaede V Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the BYG Carba Test, a New Electrochemical Assay for Rapid Laboratory Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Pierre Bogaerts; Sami Yunus; Marion Massart; Te-Din Huang; Youri Glupczynski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A Pilot Study on Carbapenemase Detection: Do We See the Same Level of Agreement as with the CLSI Observations.

Authors:  Agila Kumari Pragasam; Rani Diana Sahni; Shalini Anandan; Archa Sharma; Radha Gopi; Noorjahan Hadibasha; Priya Gunasekaran; Balaji Veeraraghavan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  High incidence and endemic spread of NDM-1-positive Enterobacteriaceae in Henan Province, China.

Authors:  Shangshang Qin; Ying Fu; Qijing Zhang; Hui Qi; Jian Guo Wen; Hui Xu; Lijuan Xu; Li Zeng; Hao Tian; Lijuan Rong; Yonghong Li; Lihong Shan; Hongde Xu; Yunsong Yu; Xianju Feng; Hong-Min Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The pros, cons, and unknowns of search and destroy for carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Prashini Moodley; Andrew Whitelaw
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 8.  Non-phenotypic tests to detect and characterize antibiotic resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Agnese Lupo; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Parham Sendi; Robert A Bonomo; Andrea Endimiani
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 9.  Beyond Susceptible and Resistant, Part III: Treatment of Infections due to Gram-Negative Organisms Producing Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Navaneeth Narayanan; Linda Johnson; Conan MacDougall
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

10.  Gram-negative bacteria that produce carbapenemases causing death attributed to recent foreign hospitalization.

Authors:  Jasmine Ahmed-Bentley; A Uma Chandran; A Mark Joffe; Desiree French; Gisele Peirano; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.