| Literature DB >> 27048282 |
Nalika Gunawardena1, Kayo Kurotani2, Susantha Indrawansa3, Daisuke Nonaka4, Tetsuya Mizoue5, Diyanath Samarasinghe6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: School health promotion has been shown to improve the lifestyle of students, but it remains unclear whether school-based programs can influence family health. We developed an innovative program that enables school children to act as change agents in promoting healthy lifestyles of their mothers. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the child-initiated intervention on weight, physical activity and dietary habit of their mothers.Entities:
Keywords: Diet; Mother; Obesity; Physical activity; Randomized controlled trial; Sri Lanka; Student
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27048282 PMCID: PMC4822262 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0369-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ISSN: 1479-5868 Impact factor: 6.457
Fig. 1Study flow diagram
Baseline characteristics of study participants
| Intervention group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of participantsa | 136 | 125 |
| Demographic variable | ||
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 37.5 (5.6) | 38.5 (5.9) |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Sinhalese | 128 (94.1) | 124 (99.2) |
| Tamil | 7 (5.2) | 1 (0.8) |
| Muslim | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Religion | ||
| Buddhism | 125 (91.9) | 121 (96.8) |
| Hindu | 6 (4.4) | 1 (0.8) |
| Roman Catholic/Christian | 4 (2.9) | 3 (2.4) |
| Islam | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Education attainment | ||
| Primary level (Grade 1–5) | 43 (31.6) | 28 (22.4) |
| Junior high school | 72 (52.9) | 73 (58.4) |
| High school or higher | 21 (15.4) | 24 (19.2) |
| Household income | ||
| ≤ 40,000 Rp/month | 100 (73.5) | 84 (67.2) |
| 40,001–60,000 Rp/month | 24 (17.7) | 28 (22.4) |
| ≥ 60,001 Rp/month | 12 (8.8) | 13 (10.4) |
| Occupation | ||
| Housewife | 79 (58.1) | 74 (59.2) |
| Employed | 57 (41.9) | 51 (40.8) |
| History of diabetes | 14 (10.3) | 7 (5.6) |
| History of hypertension | 8 (5.9) | 3 (2.4) |
| History of dyslipidemia | 7 (5.2) | 3 (2.4) |
| Outcome variable | ||
| Weight in kg, mean (SD) | 56.4 (10.8) | 55.7 (9.2) |
| Body mass index in kg/m2, mean (SD) | 24.4 (4.6) | 24.1 (3.9) |
| Obesity level | ||
| Lean (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) | 10 (7.4) | 10 (8.0) |
| Normal (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) | 72 (52.9) | 68 (54.4) |
| Overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) | 40 (29.4) | 38 (30.4) |
| Obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) | 14 (10.3) | 9 (7.2) |
| Dietary intake (>4 times/week) | ||
| Green leafy vegetables | 98 (72.1) | 95 (76.0) |
| Other vegetables | 115 (84.6) | 106 (84.8) |
| Citrus fruits | 40 (29.4) | 37 (29.6) |
| Yellow fruits | 50 (36.8) | 45 (36.0) |
| Other fruits | 86 (63.2) | 74 (59.2) |
| Whole grain product | 80 (58.8) | 74 (59.2) |
| Pulse as main dish | 10 (7.4) | 12 (9.6) |
| Deep fried foods | 10 (7.4) | 9 (7.2) |
| Sugar-sweetened beverages | 11 (8.1) | 16 (12.8) |
| Household purchase (/month) | ||
| Oil (bottles, median, IQR) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) |
| Sugar (kg, median, IQR) | 4 (3, 6) | 4 (2, 6) |
| Biscuits (packets, median, IQR) | 5.5 (4, 16) | 6 (3, 16) |
| Ice cream (litters, median, IQR) | 1 (0, 4) | 1 (1, 3) |
| Physical activity | ||
| Total (MET-min/week, median, IQR) | 4812 (1641, 9930) | 3360 (1343, 7089) |
| Adequate (≥5359 MET-min/week) | 61 (46.6) | 42 (33.6) |
| No. of daily steps (median, IQR) | 7163 (4930, 11179) | 6492 (4426, 8848) |
Data are numbers (percentages) unless otherwise indicated
BMI body mass index, IQR inter-quartile range, MET metabolic equivalent, SD standard deviation
aNo. of intervention and control groups were 131 and 125, respectively for physical activity and 122 and 100, respectively for steps
Effect of intervention on primary and secondary outcomes at 12th month follow-up: completer analysis
| Intervention group | Control group | Between-group difference at follow-up | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcomes (primary/secondary) |
| Mean (SD), median (IQR) or number (percentage) | Mean (SD) or median (IQR) of change from baseline |
| Mean (SD), median (IQR) or number (percentage) | Mean (SD) or median (IQR) of change from baseline | Difference in means or odds ratio (95 % confidence interval)a |
|
| Continuous outcomes (primary) | ||||||||
| Weight (kg) | 136 | 54.8 (10.0) | −1.7 (2.8) | 125 | 56.6 (9.6) | 0.9 (2.7) | −2.49 (−3.38, −1.60) | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 136 | 23.7 (4.4) | −0.7 (1.2) | 125 | 24.4 (4.1) | 0.3 (1.2) | −0.99 (−1.40, −0.58) | <0.0001 |
| No. of daily steps | 122 | 8026 (5750, 9919) | 348 (−3340, 3238) | 100 | 4999 (3446, 7103) | −1588 (−3334, 915) | - | <0.0001 |
| Continuous outcomes (secondary) | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Cooking oil (bottles) | 134 | 2 (1, 4) | 0 (−1, 1) | 125 | 2 (1, 4) | 0 (−1, 2) | - | 0.22 |
| Sugar (kg) | 136 | 3 (2, 4) | −1 (−3, 0) | 125 | 4 (2, 6) | 0 (−1, 2) | - | 0.86 |
| Biscuits (packets) | 136 | 4 (1, 10) | −3 (−12, 1) | 125 | 8 (5, 10) | 0 (−11, 6) | - | <0.0001 |
| Ice cream (litters) | 136 | 1 (0, 2) | 0 (−2, 0) | 125 | 3 (1, 5) | 1 (−1, 3) | - | 0.03 |
| Binary outcomes (primary) | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Adequate (≥5359 MET-min/week) | 133 | 67 (50.4) | 125 | 29 (23.2) | 3.25 (1.87, 5.62) | <0.0001 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Green leafy vegetables | 136 | 101 (74.3) | 125 | 84 (67.2) | 1.47 (0.54, 3.98) | 0.45 | ||
| Other vegetables | 136 | 96 (70.6) | 125 | 84 (67.2) | 1.30 (0.53, 3.18) | 0.57 | ||
| Citrus fruits | 136 | 47 (34.6) | 125 | 41 (32.8) | 1.09 (0.62, 1.94) | 0.77 | ||
| Yellow fruits | 136 | 58 (42.7) | 125 | 46 (36.8) | 1.38 (0.74, 2.56) | 0.31 | ||
| Other fruits | 136 | 76 (55.9) | 125 | 48 (38.4) | 2.10 (0.94, 4.68) | 0.07 | ||
| Whole grain product | 136 | 42 (30.9) | 125 | 50 (40.0) | 0.72 (0.43, 1.21) | 0.21 | ||
| Pulse as main dish | 136 | 7 (5.2) | 125 | 11 (8.8) | 0.62 (0.21, 1.86) | 0.39 | ||
| Deep fried foods | 136 | 5 (3.7) | 125 | 5 (4.0) | 0.81 (0.22, 3.04) | 0.75 | ||
| Sugar-sweetened beverages | 136 | 10 (7.4) | 125 | 11 (8.8) | 0.73 (0.29, 1.84) | 0.50 | ||
BMI body mass index, IQR inter-quartile range, MET metabolic equivalent, SD standard deviation
aMultilevel linear regression for continuous outcomes and multilevel logistic regression for binary outcomes, with school as the cluster variable and adjustment for ethnicity and each outcome value at baseline