Francesca Mattioli1, Carmen Fucile2, Valerio Del Bono3, Valeria Marini2, Andrea Parisini3, Alexandre Molin4, Maria Laura Zuccoli2, Giulia Milano2, Romano Danesi5, Anna Marchese6, Marialuisa Polillo5, Claudio Viscoli3, Paolo Pelosi4, Antonietta Martelli2, Antonello Di Paolo5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, n. 2, 16132, Genoa, Italy. francesca.mattioli@unige.it. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, n. 2, 16132, Genoa, Italy. 3. Infectious Diseases Clinics, IRCCS A.O.U San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi, n. 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. 4. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, IRCCS A.O.U San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi, n. 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. 5. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Savi, n.10, 56126, Pisa, Italy. 6. Section of Microbiology-DISC, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi, n. 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are characterized by high mortality. The aims of the present study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetics parameters and to assess the probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients to provide information for more effective regimens. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Meropenem was administered as 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusions at doses of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 h. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and a population pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Meropenem plasma disposition was simulated for extended (3 h; 5 h) or continuous i.v. infusions, and the following parameters were calculated: time during which free drug concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC), free minimum plasma concentrations above 4× MIC (fCmin > 4× MIC), probability of target attainment (PTA), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). RESULTS: Gender and severity of sepsis affected meropenem clearance, whose typical population values ranged from 6.22 up to 12.04 L/h (mean ± standard deviation (SD) value, 9.38 ± 4.47 L/h). Mean C min value was 7.90 ± 7.91 mg/L, suggesting a high interindividual variability. The simulation confirmed that 88 and 97.5 % of patients achieved effective C min > 4× MIC values after 3- and 5-h i.v. infusions of meropenem 2 g × 3/day, respectively. On the contrary, the same total daily doses reached the target C min > 4× MIC values in 100 % of patients when administered as continuous i.v. infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors may influence meropenem pharmacokinetics in ICU patients. Continuous i.v. infusions of meropenem seem to be more effective than standard regimens to achieve optimal therapeutic targets.
PURPOSE:Patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are characterized by high mortality. The aims of the present study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetics parameters and to assess the probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically illpatients to provide information for more effective regimens. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Meropenem was administered as 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusions at doses of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 h. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and a population pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Meropenem plasma disposition was simulated for extended (3 h; 5 h) or continuous i.v. infusions, and the following parameters were calculated: time during which free drug concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC), free minimum plasma concentrations above 4× MIC (fCmin > 4× MIC), probability of target attainment (PTA), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). RESULTS: Gender and severity of sepsis affected meropenem clearance, whose typical population values ranged from 6.22 up to 12.04 L/h (mean ± standard deviation (SD) value, 9.38 ± 4.47 L/h). Mean C min value was 7.90 ± 7.91 mg/L, suggesting a high interindividual variability. The simulation confirmed that 88 and 97.5 % of patients achieved effective C min > 4× MIC values after 3- and 5-h i.v. infusions of meropenem 2 g × 3/day, respectively. On the contrary, the same total daily doses reached the target C min > 4× MIC values in 100 % of patients when administered as continuous i.v. infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors may influence meropenem pharmacokinetics in ICU patients. Continuous i.v. infusions of meropenem seem to be more effective than standard regimens to achieve optimal therapeutic targets.
Entities:
Keywords:
Critically ill patients; Meropenem; Population pharmacokinetic; Therapeutic drug monitoring
Authors: Johan W Mouton; Michael N Dudley; Otto Cars; Hartmut Derendorf; George L Drusano Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jared L Crandon; Robert E Ariano; Sheryl A Zelenitsky; Anthony M Nicasio; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ivan Chytra; Martin Stepan; Jan Benes; Petr Pelnar; Alexandra Zidkova; Tamara Bergerova; Richard Pradl; Eduard Kasal Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Dagan O Lonsdale; Emma H Baker; Karin Kipper; Charlotte Barker; Barbara Philips; Andrew Rhodes; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kamrul Islam; Fekade B Sime; Steven C Wallis; Michelle J Bauer; Saiyuri Naicker; Hayoung Won; Hosam M Zowawi; Md Abu Choudhury; Tahmina Shirin; Zakir H Habib; Patrick N A Harris; Meerjady S Flora; Jason A Roberts Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: N M Smith; J R Lenhard; K R Boissonneault; C B Landersdorfer; J B Bulitta; P N Holden; A Forrest; R L Nation; J Li; B T Tsuji Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Helen W Boucher; Paul G Ambrose; H F Chambers; Richard H Ebright; Amanda Jezek; Barbara E Murray; Jason G Newland; Belinda Ostrowsky; John H Rex Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.759