Anna Chan Kwong1,2,3, Amaury O'Jeanson4,5, Sonia Khier4,5. 1. Pharmacokinetic Modelling Department, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France. anna.chankwong@gmail.com. 2. Probabilities and Statistics Department, Institut Montpelliérain Alexander Grothendieck (IMAG), CNRS UMR 5149, UMR 5149, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France. anna.chankwong@gmail.com. 3. SMARTc Group, Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France. anna.chankwong@gmail.com. 4. Pharmacokinetic Modelling Department, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France. 5. Probabilities and Statistics Department, Institut Montpelliérain Alexander Grothendieck (IMAG), CNRS UMR 5149, UMR 5149, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To improve the predictive ability of literature models for model-informed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem in intensive care units, we propose to tweak the literature models with the "prior approach" using a subset of the data. This study compares the predictive ability of both literature and tweaked models on TDM concentrations of meropenem in critically ill patients. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from patients of an intensive care unit treated with intravenous meropenem. Data were split six times into an "estimation" and a "prediction" datasets. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of meropenem were selected from literature. These models were run on the "estimation" dataset with the $PRIOR subroutine in NONMEM to obtain tweaked models. The literature and tweaked models were used a priori (with covariate only) and with Bayesian fitting to predict each individual concentration from the previous concentration(s). Their respective predictive abilities were compared using median relative prediction error (MDPE%) and median absolute relative prediction error (MDAPE%). RESULTS: The total dataset was composed of 115 concentrations from 58 patients. For each of the six splits, the "estimation" and the "prediction" datasets were respectively composed of 44 and 14 patients or 45 and 13 patients. Six popPK models were selected in the literature. MDPE% and MDAPE% were globally lower for the tweaked than for the literature models, especially for a priori predictions. CONCLUSION: The "prior approach" could be a valuable tool to improve the predictive ability of literature models, especially for a priori predictions, which are important to optimize dosing in emergency situations.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To improve the predictive ability of literature models for model-informed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem in intensive care units, we propose to tweak the literature models with the "prior approach" using a subset of the data. This study compares the predictive ability of both literature and tweaked models on TDM concentrations of meropenem in critically illpatients. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from patients of an intensive care unit treated with intravenous meropenem. Data were split six times into an "estimation" and a "prediction" datasets. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of meropenem were selected from literature. These models were run on the "estimation" dataset with the $PRIOR subroutine in NONMEM to obtain tweaked models. The literature and tweaked models were used a priori (with covariate only) and with Bayesian fitting to predict each individual concentration from the previous concentration(s). Their respective predictive abilities were compared using median relative prediction error (MDPE%) and median absolute relative prediction error (MDAPE%). RESULTS: The total dataset was composed of 115 concentrations from 58 patients. For each of the six splits, the "estimation" and the "prediction" datasets were respectively composed of 44 and 14 patients or 45 and 13 patients. Six popPK models were selected in the literature. MDPE% and MDAPE% were globally lower for the tweaked than for the literature models, especially for a priori predictions. CONCLUSION: The "prior approach" could be a valuable tool to improve the predictive ability of literature models, especially for a priori predictions, which are important to optimize dosing in emergency situations.
Authors: Femke de Velde; Johan W Mouton; Brenda C M de Winter; Teun van Gelder; Birgit C P Koch Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Jason A Roberts; Marta Ulldemolins; Michael S Roberts; Brett McWhinney; Jacobus Ungerer; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Gloria Wong; Andras Farkas; Rachel Sussman; Gergely Daroczi; William W Hope; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Joan Antoni Schoenenberger-Arnaiz; Faten Ahmad-Diaz; Mar Miralbes-Torner; Ana Aragones-Eroles; Manuel Cano-Marron; Mercedes Palomar-Martinez Journal: Eur J Hosp Pharm Date: 2019-02-27
Authors: Sofie A M Dhaese; Andras Farkas; Pieter Colin; Jeffrey Lipman; Veronique Stove; Alain G Verstraete; Jason A Roberts; Jan J De Waele Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Anna H-X P Chan Kwong; Elisa A M Calvier; David Fabre; Florence Gattacceca; Sonia Khier Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 2.745