Literature DB >> 27047868

UNSTABLE FEMORAL FRACTURES TREATED WITH TITANIUM ELASTIC INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS, IN CHILDREN.

Jamil Faissal Soni1, Gisele Schelle2, Weverley Valenza2, Anna Carolina Pavelec2, Camila Deneka Arantes Souza3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indications, epidemiology, associated lesions, complications and prognosis among children with unstable femoral diaphysis fractures who were treated with titanium elastic intramedullary nails.
METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis on 24 patients aged 5-12 years with unstable femoral diaphysis fractures who underwent surgical treatment with elastic titanium intramedullary nails at the Cajuru University Hospital, Curitiba-PR, between April 2002 and March 2008, with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. The epidemiological data, angular deviations, leg shortening and bone consolidation were evaluated.
RESULTS: The medical files of 113 cases operated between April 2002 and March 2008 were reassessed. From these, 24 cases of unstable femoral diaphysis fractures treated with elastic titanium intramedullary nails with retrograde insertion were included in the study. There were two bilateral fractures and two exposed fractures. Seven patients were female and 17 were male, and the mean age was 8.3 years. The following were presented at the end of the study: shortening, varus or valgus displacement, final retrocurvatum or antecurvatum of zero, and absence of delayed consolidation or pseudarthrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The elastic titanium intramedullary nails were easily placed and removed. We believe that using elastic titanium intramedullary nails is a good option for fixation of unstable femoral fractures in children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Femoral Fractures/complications; Fracture Fixation; Internal Fixators; Intramedullary; Orthopedic Fixation Devices; Titanium

Year:  2015        PMID: 27047868      PMCID: PMC4799446          DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30006-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


INTRODUCTION

Femoral diaphysis fractures are caused by high-energy trauma and are among the commonest pediatric traumatic lesions treated by orthopedic surgeons1, 2, 3. In children and adolescents, these fractures present bimodal distribution, with peaks at between two and three years of age (5.9/10,000/year) and at 17-18 years (4.2/10,000/year). The commonest causes are falls, bicycle and motorcycle accidents, and road accidents. The treatment for these fractures ranges from immediate closed reduction using a plaster cast, traction and a plaster cast later on, to surgical stabilization with intramedullary devices, plates and screws and external fixators6, 7, 8. However, there is still much debate regarding the best treatment for children between the ages of six and 16 years. Use of plaster after a period of traction is a secure method with few complications. However, it is associated with psychological, social, educational and economic difficulties. Certain complications that are present in surgical methods like external fixation, plates and solid intramedullary nails have led to a search for “ideal” fixation devices for the pediatric population. In this manner, flexible intramedullary nails made of titanium have emerged. Surgical treatment of pediatric femoral fractures was avoided for many years, partly because of its complications (such as renewed fracturing, scarring and infection) and also because of the belief that overgrowth of the femur would occur and therefore that anatomical reduction might not be favorable. Reynolds demonstrated that fractures of the femur and tibia resulted in accelerated growth of these bones for up to two years, reaching a maximum after three months, with a growth rate up to 38% greater than in the contralateral limb. Several studies have shown accelerated overgrowth may occur following a femoral fracture during childhood10, 11 and that this creates deformity in the limb, which persists until adolescence and the start of adulthood. The complications that have been described in relation to the use of titanium elastic nails in cases of femoral fracture are knee pain at the insertion, protruding nail, nail migration or exit, shortening of the fracture, pseudarthrosis and delayed consolidation13, 14, 15. The complications are classified as major or minor. Major complications are those that require surgical treatment, such as skewed consolidation, delayed consolidation or pseudarthrosis3, 13, 16. Intramedullary titanium elastic nails used to treat femoral diaphysis fractures in children present good results, but the same fractures in older children present greater incidence of complications. The conclusion from many studies is that there are greater numbers of complications among patients over the age of 11 years, obese patients or patients with unstable fracture patterns13, 14, 16, 17. Fractures are considered to be unstable if they are comminuted or long and oblique, i.e. the length of the fracture is greater than the diameter of the femur at the level of the fracture15, 18. The aim of the present study was to assess the indications, epidemiology, associated lesions, complications and prognosis in treatments for unstable femoral diaphysis fractures in children, using elastic intramedullary nails made of titanium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective assessments were made on 113 cases of femoral fractures in children that had been treated surgically using titanium elastic intramedullary nails at Cajuru University Hospital, in Curitiba, PR, between April 2002 and March 2008. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research on Human Beings of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, under report no. 0005267/11. The inclusion criteria were as follows: unstable diaphyseal femoral fractures (comminuted or long and oblique, i.e. the length of the fracture was greater than the diameter of the femur at the level of the fracture)15, 18; treated using elastic intramedullary nails made of titanium, with retrograde insertion; and minimum follow-up of 36 months. The exclusion criteria were as follows: stable femoral fractures; fractures in bones presenting pathological conditions; fractures in the metaphyseal region; and cases in which the approach chosen was anterograde insertion of the flexible intramedullary nails made of titanium. In total, 24 fractures in 24 patients were studied. Two patients presented bilateral fractures, but only one of the fractures was unstable in each patient (cases 14 and 24). Chart 1 presents the population analyzed. This was a retrospective observational study, in which the medical files were evaluated and the following data were gathered: age, sex, mechanism of the trauma, presence of exposure and side affected. The angular deviations were assessed on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs produced before the operation, immediately after the operation, later on after the operation and after removal of the synthesis material (Figure 1). The angular deviations evaluated were valgus, varus, antecurvatum and retrocurvatum.
Figure 1

Series of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs on the femur of a 10-year-old female patient who was a victim in a car crash: before the operation (A), early postoperative period (B), late postoperative period (C) and final postoperative evaluation (D) after removal of the elastic intramedullary nails.

Shortening or overgrowth was assessed using scanometry or panoramic radiographs of the lower limbs at the end of the treatment. The criteria of Flynn et al were developed in order to assess the results relating to use of flexible intramedullary nails and consisted of four criteria: discrepancy between the limbs, deviations, pain and complications. The criteria for determining that the prognosis was poor were discrepancies greater than 2 cm, more than 10 degrees of deviation, pain and major complications and/or elevated morbidity. If a patient presented any of these criteria, the prognosis was considered to be poor. Consolidation was evaluated using the abovementioned criteria of Flynn et al with regard to angular deviation, shortening and bone consolidation.

STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY

For the statistical analysis, descriptive statistical measurements were calculated with the objective of summarizing the set of data analyzed. Thus, the quantitative variables of the study were characterized by calculating means, standard deviations, minimums and maximums. The categorical variables were summarized by means of frequency tables. To compare the evaluation times regarding the proportion of cases with null deviation, Fisher's exact test was applied. To compare the assessment times regarding the mean angular deviation, Wilcoxon's test was applied. To investigate the association between age and deviations, Spearman's coefficient was calculated. The association between sex and deviation was investigated by applying the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

We observed that 70.83% (17 patients) were male. The maximum age was 12 years and the minimum age was five years (mean of 8.33 years) (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient distribution according to sex and age.

SexFrequencyPercentage
Male1770.83%

Female729.17%

Total24100.00%

SampleMeanMinimumMaximumStandard deviation

Age248.335122.14
Regarding the side affected, 79.17% of the patients presented a fracture in the right femur and there were two cases of bilateral fracture. In 91.67% of the patients, the fractures did not present exposure. The trauma mechanisms were high energy, among which 37.5% consisted of being run over, 29.17% were falls (from a height, tripping over or from bicycles) and 33.33% were collisions (Table 2).
Table 2

Patient distribution according to side affected, fracture mechanism and exposure of the fracture.

SideFrequencyPercentage

Right1979.17%

Left520.83%

Total24100.00%

Trauma mechanismFrequencyPercentage

Run over937.50%

Fall729.17%

Collision833.33%

Total24100%

ExposureFrequencyPercentage

Closed2291.67%

Exposed28.33%

Total24100%

Fonte: SAME HUC PUC-PR.

Regarding shortening, the proportion with zero angular deviation increased significantly from before the operation to the final evaluation (p = 0.0151). The mean shortening reduced from 1.61 degrees to 0.39 degrees, which was a significant difference (p = 0.016) (Chart 2). The proportion for which the varus or valgus deviation in the frontal plane was considered to be zero increased significantly from before the operation to the final evaluation (p = 0.0002). The mean reduced from 1 to 0 degrees, which was a non-significant difference (p = 0.50) (Chart 3). The proportion for which the antecurvatum or retrocurvatum deviation in the sagittal plane was considered to be zero increased significantly from before the operation to the final evaluation (p = 0.0001). The mean reduced from –0.38 degrees to 0 degrees, which was a non-significant difference (p = 0.94) (Chart 4). There was a significant association between the deviations and age, with shortening in the immediate postoperative period (p = 0.03) (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlations between age and deviations.

SampleRatiop-value
Pre-short16−0.216940.42

Pre-VV16−0.195110.47

Pre-AR160.055530.84

EPO-short24−0.439230.03

EPO-VV240.022060.92

EPO-AR24−0.373320.07

PO-short24−0.179740.4

PO-VV240.073930.73

PO-AR24−0.394620.06

F-short23−0.330960.12

F-VV232.18E-101

F-AR232.18E-101

Legend: Pre-short = preoperative shortening, Pre-VV = preoperative varus/valgus, Pre-AR = preoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, EPO-short = early postoperative shortening, EPO-VV = early postoperative varus/valgus, EPO-AR = early postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, POshort = postoperative shortening, PO-VV = postoperative varus/valgus, PO-AR = postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, F-short = final postoperative shortening, F-VV = final postoperative varus/valgus, F-AR = final postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum.

There was no significant association between the deviations and sex (Table 4).
Table 4

Results from correlations between sex and deviations.

p-value
Pre-short0.43

Pre-VV0.54

Pre-AR1

EPO-short0.59

EPO-VV0.59

EPO-AR0.28

PO-short0.57

PO-VV1

PO-AR0.82

F-short0.84

F-VV1

F-AR1

Legend: Pre-short = preoperative shortening, Pre-VV = preoperative varus/valgus, Pre-AR = preoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, EPO-short = early postoperative shortening, EPO-VV = early postoperative varus/valgus, EPO-AR = early postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, PO-short = postoperative shortening, PO-VV = postoperative varus/valgus, PO-AR = postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum, F-short = final postoperative shortening, F-VV = final postoperative varus/valgus, F-AR = final postoperative antecurvatum/retrocurvatum.

The deviations and shortening did not show any significant association with age or sex (Table 5).
Table 5

Differences in deviations and shortening between before the operation and at the final evaluation, in relation to sex and age.

Agep-value
Shortening0.36

Varus/valgus0.43

Ante/retro0.79

Sexp-value

Shortening0.75

Varus/valgus0.28

Ante/retro0.91

Legend: ANTE = antecurvatum, RETRO = retrocurvatum.

DISCUSSION

Femoral diaphysis fractures occur frequently in children, but dilemmas still exist regarding the treatment in some cases, depending on the patient's age, fracture pattern, soft-tissue conditions, type of trauma and comorbidities. Surgical treatment enables early mobilization and has become an alternative of interest, especially for children presenting multiple trauma, cranial-encephalic trauma, floating knee, multiple fractures and vascular injuries3, 5, 15, 19, 20, which occur mainly in cases of high-energy trauma. These fractures in children generally result from high-energy trauma, as observed in the present sample. Flexible intramedullary nails are considered to be a safe and minimally invasive method with relatively low complication rates. Studies have demonstrated that surgical treatment with flexible intramedullary nails successfully achieves the objective of treating pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures and also enables early mobilization and weight-bearing5, 17. Flexible intramedullary nails made of titanium provide relative stability, with less injury at the focus, thus favoring bone consolidation. They present an excellent consolidation rate, as demonstrated in our study, and rates of 97 to 100% can be found in the literature14, 20. The length of hospital stay is short. Few problems are found in removing the synthesis material, and the patients’ satisfaction rate is high. Studies have demonstrated complication rates of 33 to 62%, and most of these are soft-tissue alterations at the site of the nail implantation. Thus, these are minor complications that do not require surgical intervention and do not leave sequelae. The commonest of these are pain at the nail insertion site, nail protrusion and nail migration or exit. Most of these complications are due to technical failures: for example, the technical guidelines state that the nail should be a maximum of 1 cm outside of the bone and should not be angled, so as to avoid protrusion and consequent local irritation13, 14, 15, 20. Many complications are difficult to assess because of retrospective study designs and incomplete data in the medical files. Anterograde insertion presents a low risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head or injury to the proximal growth plate of the femur, while retrograde insertion avoids these two sequelae. Therefore, in our clinic, we firstly indicate retrograde insertion and then, exceptionally, anterograde insertion. Several studies have shown that overgrowth may occur after a femoral diaphysis fracture during childhood, and that this may create a discrepancy in the lower limbs that persists until adolescence and young adulthood5, 12. Reynolds suggested that overgrowth occurred because of the increased vascularization needed for consolidation, and not through a compensatory mechanism. It has been suggested that cerebral dominance may have a role in this: one study did not present significant shortening and most of the patients were affected on the right side. It is unnecessary for the lower limbs to be of precisely equal size, given that at the time of skeletal maturity 40-70% of the population presents discrepancies. This is greater than 2 cm in 0.1% of the population. With regard to assessment of the results from using flexible intramedullary nails, the criteria of Flynn et al are widely used. However, even though these are considered to be a good system for evaluating surgical treatments on pediatric femoral fractures, they do not take into consideration rotational deviations, which are an important factor in fracture reduction. Sink et al found that the risk of shortening and angular deviation in the early postoperative period following unplanned surgery was significantly greater with the use of elastic intramedullary nails in cases of femoral fracture that were considered to be unstable. Narayanan et al observed that comminuted fractures that compromised more than 25% of the femoral diaphysis presented higher rates of pseudarthrosis or delayed union, thus suggesting that the stability should be increased using external fixation, thereby protecting the reduction, especially in the sagittal plane, as reported by Mani et al. Luhmann et al concluded that fixation of femoral fractures in overweight patients and use of flexible intramedullary nails of smaller diameter were associated with greater sagittal angles, and that the coronal angle was correlated with the size of the nail, with technical failure also involved. Rathjen et al reported that the complications in cases of unstable fractures of the femoral diaphysis in children treated using flexible femoral nails in their study were similar to the complications in cases of stable fractures.

CONCLUSION

Most cases of femoral diaphysis fracture occur through high-energy trauma. We conclude that elastic intramedullary nails made of titanium can be indicated for cases of unstable pediatric femoral diaphysis fracture, with good long-term results presented. We consider that use of elastic intramedullary nails is a good option for fixation of unstable femoral fractures in children.
CaseSexSideAgeExposureTrauma mechanism
1MR12ClosedRun over

2MR6ClosedRun over

3ML8ClosedFall from bike

4ML9ClosedFall from height

5FL11ClosedCar crash

6MR12ClosedCar crash

7MR9ExposedCar crash

8MR5ClosedRun over

9MR9ClosedRun over

10MR7ClosedRun over

11FR8ClosedRun over

12MR6ClosedRun over

13MR5ClosedCar crash

14FR unstable + L stable9ExposedCar crash

15MR9ClosedFall from motorcycle

16FR7ClosedTripped over

17MR12ClosedTripped over

18MR8ClosedFall from bike

19FR6ClosedRun over

20MR6ClosedRun over

21FL9ClosedCar crash

22MR10ClosedTripped over

23FL10ClosedCar crash

24MR unstable + L stable7ClosedCar crash

Legend: M = male, F = female, R = right, L = left.


Before operation
Early postop
Late postop
Final
ShorteningF%F%F%F%
Same425.00%833.33%2083.33%1565.22%

> 01275.00%1666.67%416.67%834.78%

< 000.00%00.00%00.00%00.00%

Sample16100.00%24100.00%24100.00%23100.00%

ShorteningBefore operationEarly postopLate postopFinal

Mean1.611.040.40.39

Minimum0000

Maximum4.2552.7

SD1.321.181.110.72

Legend: F = frequency, % = percentage, postop = postoperative period, Final = final postoperative evaluation, sd = standard deviation.


Before operation
Early postop
Late postop
Final
Varus / valgusF%F%F%F%
Same850.00%1562.50%2291.67%23100.00%

> 0531.25%520.83%14.17%00.00%

< 0318.75%416.67%14.17%00.00%

Sample16100.00%24100.00%24100.00%23100.00%

Varus / valgusBefore operationEarly postopLate postopFinal

Mean1−0.21−0.290

Minimum−21−10−100

Maximum201230

SD9.34.712.160

Legend: F = frequency, % = percentage, postop = postoperative period, Final = final postoperative evaluation, sd = standard deviation.


Before operation
Early postop
Late postop
Final
Ante / retroF%F%F%F%
Same743.75%1875.00%2187.50%23100.00%

> 0318.75%416.67%28.33%00.00%

< 0637.50%28.33%14.17%00.00%

Sample16100.00%24100.00%24100.00%23100.00%

Ante / retroBefore operationEarly postopLate postopFinal

Mean−0.381.960.920

Minimum−20−4−40

Maximum2018160

SD9.075.683.910

Legend: F = frequency, % = percentage, Ante = antecurvatum, retro = retrocurvatum, postop = postoperative period, Final = final postoperative evaluation, sd = standard deviation.

  23 in total

1.  Fractures of the femur in children; an analysis of their effect on the subsequent length of both bones of the lower limb.

Authors:  N R GREVILLE; J C IVINS
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Comparison of compression plate and flexible intramedullary nail fixation in pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Omur Caglar; Mehmet C Aksoy; Muharrem Yazici; Adil Surat
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Titanium elastic nailing of fractures of the femur in children. Predictors of complications and poor outcome.

Authors:  L A Moroz; F Launay; M S Kocher; P O Newton; S L Frick; P D Sponseller; J M Flynn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  Modern trends in internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures in children. A critical review.

Authors:  K D Parsch
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model.

Authors:  Ying Li; Kathryne J Stabile; Jeffrey S Shilt
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and a spica cast to treat femoral fractures in children.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Lael M Luedtke; Theodore J Ganley; Judy Dawson; Richard S Davidson; John P Dormans; Malcolm L Ecker; John R Gregg; B David Horn; Denis S Drummond
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Biomechanical comparison of flexible stainless steel and titanium nails with external fixation using a femur fracture model.

Authors:  Usha S Mani; Christopher T Sabatino; Sanjeev Sabharwal; David J Svach; Adam Suslak; Fred F Behrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Scott J Luhmann; Mario Schootman; Perry L Schoenecker; Matthew B Dobbs; J Eric Gordon
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Growth changes in fractured long-bones: a study of 126 children.

Authors:  D A Reynolds
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981-02

10.  Differences in biomechanical stability of femur fracture fixation when using titanium nails of increasing diameter.

Authors:  Andrew Mahar; Ernest Sink; Frances Faro; Richard Oka; Peter O Newton
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.548

View more
  1 in total

1.  Leg Length Discrepancy Due to Loss of Femoral Antecurvatum After Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Diaphyseal Fractures of the Femur in Children.

Authors:  Panagiotis V Samelis; Eftychios Papagrigorakis; Theodore Troupis; Panagiotis Koulouvaris
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.