Andrew Mahar1, Ernest Sink, Frances Faro, Richard Oka, Peter O Newton. 1. Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, MC5054, 3020 Children's Way, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA, amahar@chsd.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability generated when utilizing increasing sizes of titanium (Ti) flexible nails for fixation of simulated comminuted femur fractures. METHODS: Five synthetic adolescent-sized femur models were reamed to create a 9-mm canal. A 2-cm section was removed in the mid-diaphysis to simulate comminution. Each femur was first stabilized with bilateral, retrograde 3.0-mm titanium elastic nails. Femurs were tested in axial rotation and axial compression. The constructs were removed, and femurs were re-nailed with 3.5-mm nails. Identical testing was conducted. These nails were then removed, and femurs were re-nailed with 4.0-mm nails. This provided data on "canal fill" representing 67, 78 and 89% of the reamed canal diameter. Data for axial rotation (degrees) and failure load (N) required to produce 5 mm of fracture shortening were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and a Tukey's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: For axial rotation, there were statistically significant improvements in rotational control for each increase in nail size. For axial stability, each increase in nail size resulted in increased axial failure loads to 5 mm, although these data were not statistically different. A specific comparison between 3.0- and 3.5-mm nails for compressive stability found significantly greater stability afforded by using 3.5-mm nails. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study demonstrate that increasing the amount of canal fill provides significant improvements in rotational control. The largest improvement was seen when increasing from 3.0- to 3.5-mm nails. While increasing the nail size from 3.5 to 4.0 mm again provided greater stability, larger nails may be more difficult to insert. Thus, increasing the nail size for femoral fracture fixation should be considered after measuring the diameter of the canal and evaluating the potential difficulty of insertion as well as specific demands of the fracture pattern.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability generated when utilizing increasing sizes of titanium (Ti) flexible nails for fixation of simulated comminuted femur fractures. METHODS: Five synthetic adolescent-sized femur models were reamed to create a 9-mm canal. A 2-cm section was removed in the mid-diaphysis to simulate comminution. Each femur was first stabilized with bilateral, retrograde 3.0-mm titanium elastic nails. Femurs were tested in axial rotation and axial compression. The constructs were removed, and femurs were re-nailed with 3.5-mm nails. Identical testing was conducted. These nails were then removed, and femurs were re-nailed with 4.0-mm nails. This provided data on "canal fill" representing 67, 78 and 89% of the reamed canal diameter. Data for axial rotation (degrees) and failure load (N) required to produce 5 mm of fracture shortening were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and a Tukey's post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: For axial rotation, there were statistically significant improvements in rotational control for each increase in nail size. For axial stability, each increase in nail size resulted in increased axial failure loads to 5 mm, although these data were not statistically different. A specific comparison between 3.0- and 3.5-mm nails for compressive stability found significantly greater stability afforded by using 3.5-mm nails. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study demonstrate that increasing the amount of canal fill provides significant improvements in rotational control. The largest improvement was seen when increasing from 3.0- to 3.5-mm nails. While increasing the nail size from 3.5 to 4.0 mm again provided greater stability, larger nails may be more difficult to insert. Thus, increasing the nail size for femoral fracture fixation should be considered after measuring the diameter of the canal and evaluating the potential difficulty of insertion as well as specific demands of the fracture pattern.
Authors: Andrew T Mahar; Steven S Lee; Francois D Lalonde; Tom Impelluso; Peter O Newton Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Jason K Green; Frederick W Werner; Raman Dhawan; Peter J Evans; Sean Kelley; Dwight A Webster Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2005-06-14 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Scott J Luhmann; Mario Schootman; Perry L Schoenecker; Matthew B Dobbs; J Eric Gordon Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Alvin K Shieh; Augustine M Saiz; Kelsey S Hideshima; Brian M Haus; Holly B Leshikar Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 1.548