Literature DB >> 27047776

The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes.

Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor1, Warren Matthew Rozen1, Muhammad Chowdhry1, Nakul Gamanlal Patel1, Whitney T H Chow1, Matthew Griffiths1, Venkat V Ramakrishnan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous couplers are ubiquitous around the world and are a useful tool for the reconstructive microsurgeon. A systematic review of coupler performance studies demonstrated a thrombosis rate range of 0% to 3%, whilst the average time of using the device is 5 minutes. There is sparse published data on cost analysis and the impact of operator experience on the anastomotic coupler device success. Improvements in outcomes other than time benefits have also not been shown. This study aims to address these deficiencies in the literature.
METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was undertaken, aiming to compare equivalent groups of patients that had free flap surgery with venous micro-anastomoses with those that had sutured anastomoses. The cohort comprised all patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at the St Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery & Burns from January 2009 to December 2014.
RESULTS: Between January 2010 to December 2014, 1,064 patients underwent 1,206 free flap breast reconstructions. The average age of patients was 50 years. Seventy percent of patients underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction during this period with the remaining 30% having a delayed reconstruction. The 1,206 free flaps comprised of 83 transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flaps, and 1,123 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. In total the coupler was used in 319 flaps, 26% of the cohort. There was a statistically significant clinical benefit in using the anastomotic coupler for venous anastomosis. Overall, the return to theatre rate was 12.69% whilst the overall flap loss rate was 0.75%. The overall coupler failure rate was significantly less at 1.4% whilst sutured vein failure rate was 3.57% (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The anastomotic coupler for venous anastomosis in free flap surgery is associated with reduced operating times, reduced take-backs to theatre and cost benefits. This is the first study to demonstrate clear clinical benefits to anastomotic couplers, and suggests that these may be the gold standard for venous microanastomosis. With increasing experience with their use and technological advances, these outcomes may continue to improve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Suture; free flap; microsurgery; microvascular; rib; vessel

Year:  2016        PMID: 27047776      PMCID: PMC4791359          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  9 in total

1.  A simple new apparatus for small vessel anastomosisi (free autograft of the sigmoid included).

Authors:  K NAKAYAMA; T TAMIYA; K YAMAMOTO; S AKIMOTO
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis: outcomes of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Iain S Whitaker; Rafael Acosta
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Blood loss and transfusion rates in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Introducing a new predictor.

Authors:  Nikolaos S Lymperopoulos; Stratos Sofos; Joannis Constantinides; Ommen Koshy; Kenneth Graham
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Microvascular lifeboats: a stepwise approach to intraoperative venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles Galanis; Phuong Nguyen; Justin Koh; Jason Roostaeian; Jaco Festekjian; Christopher Crisera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Accurately costing unilateral delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J T Paget; K C Young; S M Wilson
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device.

Authors:  B Ardehali; A N Morritt; A Jain
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Blood flow through sutured and coupled microvascular anastomoses: a comparative computational study.

Authors:  Richard A J Wain; Justin P M Whitty; Milind D Dalal; Michael C Holmes; Waqar Ahmed
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  The UNILINK instrument system for fast and safe microvascular anastomosis.

Authors:  L T Ostrup; A Berggren
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian; Bahram Momen; Paul N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.730

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Microsurgical refinements with the use of internal mammary (IM) perforators as recipient vessels in transverse upper gracilis (TUG) autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samer Saour; Guido Libondi; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

2.  The Exoscope versus operating microscope in microvascular surgery: A simulation non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Georgios Pafitanis; Michalis Hadjiandreou; Alexander Alamri; Christopher Uff; Daniel Walsh; Simon Myers
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-15

3.  100 Steps of a DIEP Flap-A Prospective Comparative Cohort Series Demonstrating the Successful Implementation of Process Mapping in Microsurgery.

Authors:  Hrsikesa R Sharma; Warren M Rozen; Bhagwat Mathur; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-15

4.  Current Advances in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jevan Cevik; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The effect of CT angiography and venous couplers on surgery duration in microvascular breast reconstruction: a single operator's experience.

Authors:  Ledibabari Mildred Ngaage; Georgette Oni; Bruno Di Pace; Raed Rafat Hamed; Laura Fopp; Brendan Chuj Koo; Charles Musonda Malata
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-10

6.  Mechanical Anastomotic Coupling Device versus Hand-sewn Venous Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction-An Analysis of 1694 Venous Anastomoses.

Authors:  Rajan Arora; Kripa Shanker Mishra; Hemant T Bhoye; Ajay Kumar Dewan; Ravi K Singh; Ravikiran Naalla
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-05

7.  Mechanical strength and hydrostatic testing of VIVO adhesive in sutureless microsurgical anastomoses: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Marius Heitzer; Julia Brockhaus; Kristian Kniha; Felix Merkord; Florian Peters; Frank Hölzle; Evgeny Goloborodko; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital-A Standardized and Safe Procedure.

Authors:  Dominik Steiner; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph; Marweh Schmitz; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.