Literature DB >> 15220572

Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast.

Maurice Y Nahabedian1, Bahram Momen, Paul N Manson.   

Abstract

The prevalence of anastomotic failure resulting in return to the operating room and flap necrosis after microvascular breast reconstruction ranges from 1 to 5 percent. The purpose of this study was to review a set of factors that may be associated with this occurrence. Microvascular reconstruction of the breast was performed in 198 women from January of 1998 to July of 2002. The mean age for all women was 47.7 years. There were 158 unilateral and 41 bilateral reconstructions, for a total of 240 flaps. The specific flaps included the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (n = 176), the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (n = 58), and the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 6). Upon recognition of anastomotic failure, women were immediately returned to the operating room. Factors that were considered relevant to anastomotic failure included the choice of recipient vessel, timing of reconstruction, previous chest wall radiation therapy, previous axillary lymph node dissection, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, patient age, and hematoma. Patient follow-up ranged from 5 to 59 months. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and exact logistic regression were used for analyses and to summarize data. Of the 240 flaps, return to the operating room was necessary for 20 (8.3 percent), total necrosis occurred in nine (3.8 percent), and the rate of flap salvage was 55 percent (11 of 20 flaps). Venous occlusion was responsible for 16 of the 20 returns and eight of the nine failures. Statistical analysis demonstrated that both return to the operating room and flap necrosis were significantly associated with venous occlusion, delayed reconstruction, and hematoma. Previous lymph node dissection and previous radiation therapy had only a weak association with return to the operating room. The results of this study demonstrate that venous occlusion is responsible for return to the operating room and flap necrosis in the majority of cases. Age, tobacco use, choice of recipient vessel, and diabetes mellitus were not associated with anastomotic failure. The significance of delayed reconstruction may be related to its frequent association with previous lymph node dissection and/or radiation therapy resulting in perivascular fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220572     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000127798.69644.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

2.  "Maras Powder" a Form of Smokeless Tobacco as a Perioperative Risk Factor in Microsurgery.

Authors:  Tahsin Oğuz Acartürk
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-03-09

Review 3.  CT angiography for surgical planning in face transplantation candidates.

Authors:  S Soga; B Pomahac; N Wake; K Schultz; R F Prior; K Kumamaru; M L Steigner; D Mitsouras; J Signorelli; E M Bueno; D S Enterline; F J Rybicki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes.

Authors:  Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Warren Matthew Rozen; Muhammad Chowdhry; Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Whitney T H Chow; Matthew Griffiths; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

6.  Head and neck reconstruction with free flaps: a report on 213 cases.

Authors:  Olivier Dassonville; Gilles Poissonnet; Emmanuel Chamorey; Jacques Vallicioni; François Demard; Joseph Santini; Mayeul Lecoq; Sophie Converset; Pouya Mahdyoun; Alexandre Bozec
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effect of Coagulation Status and Co-Morbidity on Flap Success and Complications in Patients with Reconstructed Free Flap.

Authors:  Yusufcan Ekin; İlkben Günüşen; Özlem Yakut Özdemir; Yiğit Özer Tiftikçioğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2019-01-29

8.  One Versus 2 Venous Anastomoses in Free Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer L K Matthews; Noor Alolabi; Forough Farrokhyar; Sophocles H Voineskos
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 9.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

10.  Acute effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on cutaneous microcirculation--a controlled prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert Kraemer; Johan Lorenzen; Mohammad Kabbani; Christian Herold; Marc Busche; Peter M Vogt; Karsten Knobloch
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.