| Literature DB >> 27047036 |
Joydip Mukherjee1, Pradip Kumar Das1, Prabal Ranjan Ghosh1, Dipak Banerjee1, Tripti Sharma1, Debananda Basak2, Sagar Sanyal1.
Abstract
AIM: The present study has been conducted to evaluate the variation in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters among different trained breeds of dogs (viz. Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever) used for security reasons.Entities:
Keywords: dog; electrocardiogram; mean electrical axis
Year: 2015 PMID: 27047036 PMCID: PMC4774744 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1317-1320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Mean±SE of different ECG parameters with maximum and minimum values (Lead II) in different breed of dogs.
| Breed | ECG parameters (Lead II) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | Pdur (ms) | Pamp (mV) | PRdur (ms) | QRSdur (ms) | QTdur (ms) | Ramp (mV) | Tdur (ms) | Tamp (mV) | Mean electrical axis (°) | |
| Labrador | 110.6±5.1 | 0.042±0.0011 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.107a±0.005 | 0.04±0.00 | 0.2±0.007 | 0.95a±0.12 | 0.04±0.004 | 0.22±0.016 | 75.30a±6.80 |
| (88-136) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.1-0.3) | (0.08-0.12) | (0.04-0.04) | (0.08-0.16) | (0.88-1.20) | (0.04-0.08) | (0.2-0.3) | (10-78) | |
| Golden | 105.0±5.2 | 0.053±0.006 | 0.17±0.03 | 0.107a±0.01 | 0.04±0.00 | 0.21±0.006 | 1.63b±0.14 | 0.04±0.006 | 0.23±0.033 | 60.33b±7.84 |
| Retriever | (75-125) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.1-0.2) | (0.08-0.12) | (0.04-0.04) | (0.10-0.12) | (1.00-2.00) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.2-0.3) | (52-76) |
| German | 104.6±5.6 | 0.046±0.004 | 0.20±0.02 | 0.127b±0.007 | 0.04±0.003 | 0.18±0.008 | 1.14a±0.17 | 0.04±0.008 | 0.26±0.084 | 82.00c±19.43 |
| Shepherd | (88-125) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.1-0.3) | (0.12-0.16) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.17-0.21) | (1.00-2.00) | (0.04-0.06) | (0.18-0.6) | (56-120) |
Values are expressed as mean±SE. Values with different superscript within a column differs significantly (p<0.05). SE=Standard error, ECG=Electrocardiogram, HR=Heart rate
Figure-3Normal electrocardiograph (Lead-II) of Golden Retriever dog showing inverted T-wave.