Literature DB >> 27047036

Electrocardiogram pattern of some exotic breeds of trained dogs: A variation study.

Joydip Mukherjee1, Pradip Kumar Das1, Prabal Ranjan Ghosh1, Dipak Banerjee1, Tripti Sharma1, Debananda Basak2, Sagar Sanyal1.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study has been conducted to evaluate the variation in electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters among different trained breeds of dogs (viz. Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever) used for security reasons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ECG was recorded by single channel ECG at a paper speed of 25 mm/s and calibration of 10 mm=1 mV. The recordings were taken from all the standard bipolar limb leads (Lead-I, II, and III) and unipolar augmented limb leads (Lead-aVR, aVL, and aVF).
RESULTS: Heart rate was found to be highest in Labrador and lowest in German Shepherd. P-wave duration was maximum in Golden Retriever breed and lowest in Labrador. Maximum amplitude of P-wave was found in Labrador followed by German Shepherd and Golden Retriever. There was significantly (p<0.05) higher values of PR interval in German Shepherd compared to other breeds. The variation in QRS duration, ST segment duration, T-wave duration, and T-wave amplitude was found to be non-significant among breeds. Inverted T-waves were most common in Golden Retriever and German Shepherd, whereas positive T-waves were found in Labrador. There was significant (p<0.05) variation in mean electrical axis of QRS complex among different breeds and it ranges from +60° to +80°.
CONCLUSION: The present study provides the reference values for different ECG parameters to monitor the cardiac health status among Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever breeds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dog; electrocardiogram; mean electrical axis

Year:  2015        PMID: 27047036      PMCID: PMC4774744          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1317-1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


Introduction

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the voltage time graph of the electrical activities of the heart and widely used as a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool for monitoring heart rate (HR), cardiac rhythm, conduction integrity, and electrical axis [1]. Thus, it is used to evaluate different cardiac diseases in human and other animal species such as cattle [2], small ruminants [3], horses [4] as well as non-cardiac illness throughout the world. In dogs, cardiac arrhythmias and intra-cardiac conduction disturbances are commonplace problems, which can be well elucidated using ECG [5]. But in India, the exotic breeds are extensively used to perform sniffing activities by different security agencies and also reared in pet lovers’ den. The acclimatization in Indian climate refers several cardiovascular adjustments, which need to be investigated. Further, the sniffer dogs are very prone to different cardiac diseases including cardiac arrhythmia, hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, flutter, and the heart block of different degrees, which could routinely be evaluated and monitored through ECG. Earlier studies have reported reference values for ECG parameters for different breeds of dogs such as Beagle [6], Labrador [5], and German Shepherd [7]. However, a comparative study on the variation in different ECG parameters of different dog breeds is scanty. In this outset, the present work is undertaken to evaluate the variation in ECG parameters among different trained breeds of dogs (viz. Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever) used for security reasons. Though the above three exotic breeds are used for various sniffing activities in homogenous routine training mode, wide variations in ECG are reported among breeds due to genetic differences and shape of thoracic cavity [5]. In addition, the basic cardiac parameters of such dogs in the specific geo-climatic region are lacking. It is envisaged that the generated data could be used for future assessment.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The experiments on animals including all procedures of this study were approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.

Experimental animals

The study was conducted in 18 clinically healthy dogs of either sexes divided into three different breeds, namely Labrador (n=6), German Shepherd (n=6), and Golden Retriever (n=6), from Kolkata Police Training Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The age of animals ranged from 1 to 2 years with average body weight between 18 and 20 kg. Prior to the experiment, all the animals are further screened for any cardiac abnormality.

Recording of ECG

Electrographic recordings were taken by a single channel ECG (CardiartR) at a paper speed of 25 mm/s and calibration of 10 mm=1 mV. The recordings were taken from all the standard bipolar limb leads (Lead-I, II, and III) and unipolar augmented limb leads (Lead-aVR, aVL, and aVF) on thermo sensitive ECG paper (CardiartR) having a total width of 50 cm and a recording width of 40 mm. Small square represents 0.04 s on horizontal axis. The amplitude of waves, i.e., the voltage is represented in the vertical axis where 1 mm height represents 0.1 mV. At the time of recording, all the dogs were restrained manually without any anesthesia and maintained at standing condition.

Measurement of HR, complexes, intervals, and mean electrical axis (MEA)

Waves of ECG recorded by Lead II are considered as the typical waves as the depolarization vector is directed toward the electrode of Lead II [8]. Amplitude of P, Q, R, S, and T-waves was measured together with PR interval, QRS interval, and QT interval. HR was calculated by successive R-R interval. The equilateral triangle measurement system using QRS complex of Lead I and Lead III was employed to determine the MEA [9,10].

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance was used to test the significance among breeds by SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Mean ± standard error of different ECG parameters with maximum and minimum values (Lead II) in different breeds of dogs has been presented in Table-1. The ECG of Lead-II has also been depicted in Figures-1-3. There were no significant variations in HR among different breeds. Though HR was found to be highest in Labrador (110.6±5.1 beats/min) followed by Golden Retriever (105.6±5.2 beats/min) and German Shepherd (104.6±5.6 beats/min), P-duration was maximum in Golden retriever (0.053±0.006 ms) followed by German Shepherd (0.046±0.004 ms) and Labrador (0.042±0.001 ms). Maximum amplitude of P-wave was found in Labrador (0.21±0.01 mV) followed by German Shepherd (0.20±0.02 mV) and Golden retriever (0.17±0.03 mV). The PR interval in German Shepherd increased significantly (p<0.05) when compared to other breeds. The variation in QRS duration, ST-duration, T-duration, and T-wave amplitude was found to be non-significant among breeds. The MEA values in different dog breeds under study have been presented in Table-1. In Labrador, Golden Retriever, and German Shepherd, the MEA values were found to be 75.30±6.80, 60.33±7.84, and 82.00±19.43, respectively.
Table-1

Mean±SE of different ECG parameters with maximum and minimum values (Lead II) in different breed of dogs.

BreedECG parameters (Lead II)

HRPdur (ms)Pamp (mV)PRdur (ms)QRSdur (ms)QTdur (ms)Ramp (mV)Tdur (ms)Tamp (mV)Mean electrical axis (°)
Labrador110.6±5.10.042±0.00110.21±0.010.107a±0.0050.04±0.000.2±0.0070.95a±0.120.04±0.0040.22±0.01675.30a±6.80
(88-136)(0.04-0.06)(0.1-0.3)(0.08-0.12)(0.04-0.04)(0.08-0.16)(0.88-1.20)(0.04-0.08)(0.2-0.3)(10-78)
Golden105.0±5.20.053±0.0060.17±0.030.107a±0.010.04±0.000.21±0.0061.63b±0.140.04±0.0060.23±0.03360.33b±7.84
Retriever(75-125)(0.04-0.06)(0.1-0.2)(0.08-0.12)(0.04-0.04)(0.10-0.12)(1.00-2.00)(0.04-0.06)(0.2-0.3)(52-76)
German104.6±5.60.046±0.0040.20±0.020.127b±0.0070.04±0.0030.18±0.0081.14a±0.170.04±0.0080.26±0.08482.00c±19.43
Shepherd(88-125)(0.04-0.06)(0.1-0.3)(0.12-0.16)(0.04-0.06)(0.17-0.21)(1.00-2.00)(0.04-0.06)(0.18-0.6)(56-120)

Values are expressed as mean±SE. Values with different superscript within a column differs significantly (p<0.05). SE=Standard error, ECG=Electrocardiogram, HR=Heart rate

Figure-3

Normal electrocardiograph (Lead-II) of Golden Retriever dog showing inverted T-wave.

Mean±SE of different ECG parameters with maximum and minimum values (Lead II) in different breed of dogs. Values are expressed as mean±SE. Values with different superscript within a column differs significantly (p<0.05). SE=Standard error, ECG=Electrocardiogram, HR=Heart rate Normal electrocardiograph (Lead-II) of German Shepherd dog. Normal electrocardiograph (Lead-II) of Labrador dog. Normal electrocardiograph (Lead-II) of Golden Retriever dog showing inverted T-wave.

Discussion

Reference values for ECG parameters for different breeds of dogs in the present study were found to be in accordance with the earlier reports in Beagle dogs [6], Labrador [5], and German Shepherd [7]. In the present study, HR was found to be similar with the reference values as reported by Becker [8]. However, HR is highly variable in dogs and may be altered due to stress and excitation during recording [11]. In the present study, positive P-waves in all the dogs were recorded in Lead-I, II, III, and aVF and negative P-wave were seen in lead aVR and aVL. The amplitude of P-wave representing magnitude of atrial depolarization and spreads from Sinoatrial node to atrioventricular node was slightly higher in Labrador compared to normal as reported earlier [12], but in accordance with other workers [5,13]. Higher amplitude of P-wave in Labrador breeds compared to other two may be explained by the higher HR (110 beats/min) among the three breeds under study. Variation in P-wave amplitude may be explained due to stress exhibited during ECG recording [12,14]. In the present study, Q-wave of QRS complex produced due to ventricular depolarization and the electrical transmission through interventricular septum after P-wave was negatively directed in Lead I, II, III, and aVF, whereas aVR and aVL were positively directed as supported by Avizeh et al. [12], but contradictory to Burman et al. [13] and Gugjoo et al. [5] where they found absence of Q-wave in aVR and aVL lead. Amplitude of R-wave is most commonly used to evaluate the left ventricular function and considered a good indicator for ventricular contractibility [5]. In the present investigation, the amplitude of R-wave was significantly (p<0.05) lower in Labrador breed compared to other breeds in contrary to the reported higher values of R-wave amplitude in Labrador breed by Gugjoo et al. [5]. The lower amplitude of R-wave in all the dogs under our study could be explained for their adaptive cardiovascular adjustment during athletic training. In our present study, the QT interval, which is a dynamic physiological variable that can be affected by the velocities of both the ventricular conduction and repolarization, was in accordance with the earlier reports [5,15-18]. In the present investigation, T-wave amplitude and duration, which is directly related to the repolarization of the ventricular myocardial cells, were found to be within normal range as reported by earlier observation [5,19,20]. In our study, inverted T-wave was very common in Golden Retriever breed (66%) followed by German Shepherd (50%) and less frequent in Labrador (10%). The genesis of T-wave is very complex and the determinants of T-wave polarity were yet to be fully understood [21,22], whereas the altered polarity of T-wave in Lead II may be caused due to elevation of the diaphragm during respiration [23,24]. MEA values of heart in different breed of dogs under study were found to be within normal range as reported earlier [5], whereas significant (p<0.05) variation in MEA was found among breeds where MEA in Golden Retriever was more inclined to vertical axis on the frontal plane, which could be explained due to narrower thorax of Golden Retriever in comparison to Labrador and German Shepherd [11].

Conclusion

The present study provides the reference values for different ECG parameters in some trained exotic breeds of dogs acclimatized in Indian climate with cardiovascular adjustments. The observation of the present work can be used for monitoring the cardiac health status among Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever breeds used for security reasons.

Authors’ Contributions

SS planned the study. JM, PRG, DB, DB and TS recorded and provided help in analyzing the data. PKD analyzed the data. JM drafted and revised the manuscript under the guidance of PKD and SS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  13 in total

1.  Genesis of the T wave as based on an equivalent surface source model.

Authors:  A van Oosterom
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Electrocardiographic values of German shepherd dogs.

Authors:  A Rezakhani; R B Atwell; J Webster
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  The QT interval and torsade de pointes.

Authors:  A J Moss
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Fundamentals of electrocardiography interpretation.

Authors:  Daniel E Becker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

5.  The positive T wave.

Authors:  Mark Potse; Ruben Coronel; Tobias Opthof; Alain Vinet
Journal:  Anadolu Kardiyol Derg       Date:  2007-07

6.  Reference values of six-limb-lead electrocardiogram in conscious Labrador retriever dogs.

Authors:  Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo; Mozammel Hoque; Abhishek Chander Saxena; Malik Mohamed Sham-Suz Zama
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05

7.  The electrocardiogram of the normal dog.

Authors:  S O Burman; S Kahn; P Panagopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Safety of non-antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval or induce torsade de pointes: an overview.

Authors:  Fabrizio De Ponti; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Andrea Cavalli; Maurizio Recanatini; Nicola Montanaro
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Lack of correlation between canine heart rate and body size in veterinary clinical practice.

Authors:  L Ferasin; H Ferasin; C J L Little
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Continuous monitoring of ECG in horses at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  C W Scheffer; J H Robben; M M Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1995-10-07       Impact factor: 2.695

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of cardiac variables using a new electrocardiography lead system in horses.

Authors:  Worakij Cherdchutham; Kanoklada Koomgun; Suchanan Singtoniwet; Napattra Wongsutthawart; Napass Nontakanun; Wipasitnee Wanmad; Soontaree Petchdee
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Assessment of age, gender, and anxiety on ECG waveform morphology in a large population of domestic dogs.

Authors:  Lisa Murphy; Reid Nakamura; Jessica Gentile-Solomon; Allison Spake; Donald Szlosek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The effects of breed, age, sex, and body weight on electrocardiographic parameters in military working dogs.

Authors:  Wichaporn Lerdweeraphon; Surangkhana Thanwongsa; Suriya Youyod; Sermsawat Imsopa; Wootichai Kenchaiwong
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-05-30

4.  Left shift of the ventricular mean electrical axis in healthy Doberman Pinschers.

Authors:  Cristina Carnabuci; Rosalba Tognetti; Tommaso Vezzosi; Federica Marchesotti; Valentina Patata; Oriol Domenech
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  A study on the electrocardiography in dogs: Reference values and their comparison among breeds, sex, and age groups.

Authors:  Joydip Mukherjee; Smruti Smita Mohapatra; Sonali Jana; Pradip Kumar Das; Prabal Ranjan Ghosh; Kinsuk Das And Dipak Banerjee
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-10-23

6.  How Do Avalanche Dogs (and Their Handlers) Cope with Physical Exercise? Heart Rate Changes during Endurance in a Snowy Environment.

Authors:  Laura Menchetti; Martina Iaboni; Michele Matteo Santoro; Gabriella Guelfi; Silvana Diverio
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.