L Ferasin1, H Ferasin, C J L Little. 1. Specialist Veterinary Cardiology Consultancy, 20 Old Bath Road, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 1QL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: An association between heart rate (HR) and bodyweight has been reported in dogs and it is common belief that small breeds of dog exhibit higher HR than large breeds. The first aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that, in veterinary clinical practice, bodyweight does not affect HR measured in healthy dogs. A second objective of this investigation was to assess whether other variables, such as gender, breed morphology, age and demeanour, may have a significant effect on dog's HR measured in a clinical setting. METHODS: The investigation was performed via two different studies: a retrospective analysis performed on 243 electrocardiogram recordings and a prospective study based on 153 standardised clinical examinations. RESULTS: The two separate studies did not show any significant correlation between HR and bodyweight (P=0.5705 and P=0.4682, respectively). Subject's breed morphology and gender did not appear to affect HR measured under these circumstances. However, dogs under the age of one year seem to have significantly higher HRs than older dogs (P < 0.05). Finally, subject's demeanour was also found to have a significant influence on HR; lower values were recorded in relaxed dogs, and higher rates were documented in excited, nervous dogs (P < 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Normal HR could be erroneously interpreted as bradycardia or tachycardia if bodyweight was to be considered a determinant factor. Instead, HR in healthy dogs undergoing routine clinical examination is related to their demeanour or age, if younger than 12 months, but does not appear to be related to bodyweight.
OBJECTIVES: An association between heart rate (HR) and bodyweight has been reported in dogs and it is common belief that small breeds of dog exhibit higher HR than large breeds. The first aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that, in veterinary clinical practice, bodyweight does not affect HR measured in healthy dogs. A second objective of this investigation was to assess whether other variables, such as gender, breed morphology, age and demeanour, may have a significant effect on dog's HR measured in a clinical setting. METHODS: The investigation was performed via two different studies: a retrospective analysis performed on 243 electrocardiogram recordings and a prospective study based on 153 standardised clinical examinations. RESULTS: The two separate studies did not show any significant correlation between HR and bodyweight (P=0.5705 and P=0.4682, respectively). Subject's breed morphology and gender did not appear to affect HR measured under these circumstances. However, dogs under the age of one year seem to have significantly higher HRs than older dogs (P < 0.05). Finally, subject's demeanour was also found to have a significant influence on HR; lower values were recorded in relaxed dogs, and higher rates were documented in excited, nervous dogs (P < 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Normal HR could be erroneously interpreted as bradycardia or tachycardia if bodyweight was to be considered a determinant factor. Instead, HR in healthy dogs undergoing routine clinical examination is related to their demeanour or age, if younger than 12 months, but does not appear to be related to bodyweight.
Authors: Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Marie Pinkerton; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Jimmy H Saunders; Christopher J François Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Deborah M Fine; Jin-Hong Shin; Yongping Yue; Dietrich Volkmann; Stacey B Leach; Bruce F Smith; Mark McIntosh; Dongsheng Duan Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Anna Bálint; Huba Eleőd; János Körmendi; Róbert Bódizs; Vivien Reicher; Márta Gácsi Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Antoine Pironet; Pierre C Dauby; Sabine Paeme; Sarah Kosta; J Geoffrey Chase; Thomas Desaive Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240