Literature DB >> 27046115

Variability of brain anatomy for three common mouse strains.

Jan Scholz1, Christine LaLiberté2, Matthijs van Eede2, Jason P Lerch3, Mark Henkelman3.   

Abstract

The way in which brain structures express different morphologies is not fully understood. Here we investigate variability in brain anatomy using ex vivo MRI of three common laboratory mouse strains: in two inbred strains (C57BL/6 and 129S6) and one outbred strain (CD-1). We use Generalised Procrustes Analysis (GPA) to estimate modes of anatomical variability. We find three distinct bilateral modes of anatomical surface variability associated with the motor cortex, the anterior somatosensory, the retrosplenial and the entorhinal cortex. The modes of variability that are associated with the motor cortex and anterior somatosensory cortex are predominantly due to genetic, i.e. strain differences. Next, we specifically test if a particular strain is more variable. We find that only the mode associated with motor cortex size has a slightly larger variance in the outbred CD-1 mice compared to the two inbred strains. This suggests that the hypothesis that outbred strains are more variable in general is not true for brain anatomy and the use of outbred CD-1 mice does probably not come at the price of increased variability. Further, we show that the first two principal components distinguish between the three strains with 91% accuracy. This indicates that neuroanatomical strain differences are captured by considerably fewer dimensions than necessary for atlas-based or voxel-wise testing. Statistical comparisons based on shape models could thus be a powerful complement to traditional atlas and voxel-based methods at detecting gene-related brain differences in mice. Finally, we find that the principal components of individual brain structures are correlated, suggesting a tightly coupled network of interdependent developmental trajectories. These results raise the question to what degree neuroanatomical variability is directly genetically determined or the result of experience and epigenetic mechanisms.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPA; Genetics; MRI; Mouse strains; Neuroanatomy; PCA; Shape; Surface

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27046115     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

Review 1.  On the Usage of Brain Atlases in Neuroimaging Research.

Authors:  Andreas Hess; Rukun Hinz; Georgios A Keliris; Philipp Boehm-Sturm
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Automated Computational Processing of 3-D MR Images of Mouse Brain for Phenotyping of Living Animals.

Authors:  Christopher S Medina; Brett Manifold-Wheeler; Aaron Gonzales; Elaine L Bearer
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07-05

Review 3.  Diverse application of MRI for mouse phenotyping.

Authors:  Yijen L Wu; Cecilia W Lo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Mouse background genetics in biomedical research: The devil's in the details.

Authors:  Ariel M Hay; Heather L Howie; James D Gorham; Angelo D'Alessandro; Steven L Spitalnik; Krystalyn E Hudson; James C Zimring
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Analysis of neuroanatomical differences in mice with genetically modified serotonin transporters assessed by structural magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jacob Ellegood; Yohan Yee; Travis M Kerr; Christopher L Muller; Randy D Blakely; R Mark Henkelman; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele; Jason P Lerch
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 7.509

6.  Monocyte depletion attenuates the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus and preserves white matter integrity after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hadijat M Makinde; Talia B Just; Carla M Cuda; Nicola Bertolino; Daniele Procissi; Steven J Schwulst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Dissecting Neuronal Activation on a Brain-Wide Scale With Immediate Early Genes.

Authors:  Alessandra Franceschini; Irene Costantini; Francesco S Pavone; Ludovico Silvestri
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Accurate Localization of Linear Probe Electrode Arrays across Multiple Brains.

Authors:  Liu D Liu; Susu Chen; Han Hou; Steven J West; Mayo Faulkner; Michael N Economo; Nuo Li; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.