Literature DB >> 27045480

Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Brandon J Erickson, Gregory Cvetanovich, Khalid Waliullah, Michael Khair, Patrick Smith, Bernard Bach, Seth Sherman.   

Abstract

The number of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is rapidly increasing. In patients who wish to return to their preoperative level of function, specifically as it pertains to participation in sports, the gold standard of treatment following an ACL tear remains an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Despite a majority of good/excellent results following primary ACL reconstruction, there is a growing subset of patients with persistent or recurrent functional instability who require revision ACL reconstruction. Preoperative planning for revision ACL reconstruction requires a careful understanding of the root cause of ACL failure, including possible technical causes of primary ACL failure and the presence of combined knee pathology that was not addressed at the index ACL reconstruction. The decision to perform 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction is multifactorial and is reached by technical considerations that may make a 1-stage revision less optimal, including tunnel widening, arthrofibrosis, active infection, and others. Concomitant knee pathology such as meniscal deficiency, malalignment (including an increase in posterior tibial slope), chondral lesions, and other ligamentous laxity may also require a staged approach to treatment. This evidence-based review covers the indications for 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction, surgical techniques, evidence for and technique of bone grafting prior ACL tunnels, and outcomes of 2-stage revision stratified by initial cause of ACL reconstruction failure. With proper preoperative planning and an understanding of the cause of failure following the primary ACL reconstruction, revision ACL reconstruction can offer excellent outcomes in the motivated patient. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):e456-e464.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27045480     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160324-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Bacterial DNA is associated with tunnel widening in failed ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  David C Flanigan; Joshua S Everhart; Alex C DiBartola; Devendra H Dusane; Moneer M Abouljoud; Robert A Magnussen; Christopher C Kaeding; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hybrid Bone-Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ignacio Garcia-Mansilla; Kristofer J Jones; Thomas J Kremen
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 3.  Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Tibial Tunnel-First Graft-Sizing Technique.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Kim; Juho Park; Dong Hyeon Kim; Brandon Gardner; Sarah Jenkins; Patrick McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Arthroscopic Delivery of Injectable Bone Graft for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kent T Yamaguchi; Gina M Mosich; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-20

6.  Cancellous allogenic and autologous bone grafting ensure comparable tunnel filling results in two-staged revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Wolf Christian Prall; T Kusmenkov; B Schmidt; J Fürmetz; F Haasters; J H Naendrup; W Böcker; S Shafizadeh; H O Mayr; T R Pfeiffer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.