Literature DB >> 30810788

Bacterial DNA is associated with tunnel widening in failed ACL reconstructions.

David C Flanigan1,2, Joshua S Everhart3, Alex C DiBartola3, Devendra H Dusane4, Moneer M Abouljoud3,5, Robert A Magnussen3,5, Christopher C Kaeding3,5, Paul Stoodley3,4,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if tunnel widening, defined as change in maximal tunnel diameter from the time of initial bone tunnel drilling to revision surgery is associated with bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) presence and concentration in torn graft tissue from failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs).
METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive revision ACLRs were included (mean age 27.3 years SD 10.9; median time to failure 4.9 years range 105 days-20 years). Graft selection of the failed reconstruction was 68% autograft, 26% allograft, and 6% autograft/allograft hybrid with a mean drilled tunnel diameter of 8.4 mm SD 0.8. Maximal tunnel diameters prior to revision were measured on pre-operative three-dimensional imaging and compared to drilled tunnel diameters at the time of the previous reconstruction. Tissue biopsies of the failed graft were obtained from tibial, femoral, and intraarticular segments. Sterile water left open to air during revision ACLRs and tissue from primary ACLRs were used as negative controls. Clinical cultures were obtained on all revision ACLRs and PCR with universal bacterial primer on all cases and negative controls. Fluorescence microscopy was used to confirm the presence and location of biofilms in two patients with retrieved torn graft tissue and fixation material. Amount of tunnel widening was compared to bacterial DNA presence as well as bacterial DNA concentration via Welch ANOVA.
RESULTS: Bacterial DNA was present in 29/34 (85%) revision ACLRs, 1/5 (20%) of primary ACLR controls and 0/3 (0%) sterile water controls. Cultures were positive (coagulase negative Staphylococcus sp.) in one case, which also had the greatest degree of tunnel widening. Femoral widening was greater in cases with detectable bacterial DNA (mean widening 2.6 mm SD 3.0) versus without (mean 0.3 mm SD 0.6) (p = 0.003) but was unaffected by bacterial DNA concentration (p = 0.44). Tibial widening was not associated with the presence of bacterial DNA (n.s.); however, higher bacterial DNA concentrations were observed in cases with tibial widening ≥ 3.0 mm (median 2.47 ng bacterial DNA/µg total DNA) versus widening < 3.0 mm (median 0.97 ng bacterial DNA/µg total DNA) (p = 0.046). Tunnel widening was not associated with time to failure, graft selection, or number of prior surgeries (n.s., all comparisons). Fluorescence microscopy confirmed the presence of biofilms on ruptured tendon graft as well as fixation material in 2/2 cases.
CONCLUSION: Bacterial DNA is commonly encountered on failed ACLR grafts and can form biofilms. Bacterial DNA does not cause clinically apparent infection symptoms but is associated with tunnel widening. Further research is needed to determine whether graft decontamination protocols can reduce graft bacterial colonization rates, ACLR tunnel widening or ACLR failure risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACLR graft failure; ACLR tunnel widening; Bacterial DNA; Bacterial biofilm; Orthopedic biofilm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30810788     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05405-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  29 in total

1.  A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation.

Authors:  J-U Buelow; R Siebold; A Ellermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bacterial colonization of bone allografts: establishment and effects of antibiotics.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Stephanie Barr; Christopher S Adams; Noreen J Hickok; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  New methods for the detection of orthopedic and other biofilm infections.

Authors:  John William Costerton; James Christopher Post; Garth D Ehrlich; Fen Z Hu; Rachael Kreft; Laura Nistico; Sandeep Kathju; Paul Stoodley; Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Gerhard Maale; Garth James; Nick Sotereanos; Patrick DeMeo
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-18

4.  Effects of initial graft tension on femoral tunnel widening after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Keitaro Tahara; Nobuyuki Shirakawa; Sakae Tanaka; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Bacterial Deoxyribonucleic Acid Is Often Present in Failed Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Alex C DiBartola; Devendra H Dusane; Robert A Magnussen; Christopher C Kaeding; Paul Stoodley; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament autograft of patellar tendon origin.

Authors:  D Amiel; J B Kleiner; W H Akeson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Changes After ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective 2-Year Longitudinal MRI Study.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Demetris Delos; Hanna N Oltean; Katherine Vadasdi; John Cavanaugh; Hollis G Potter; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The incidence and significance of femoral tunnel widening after quadrupled hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross pin fixation.

Authors:  Jason P Klein; David M Lintner; David Downs; Kimberly Vavrenka
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  W G Clancy; R G Narechania; T D Rosenberg; J G Gmeiner; D D Wisnefske; T A Lange
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Risk and outcome of infection after different arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Mehmet S Binnet; Kerem Başarir
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  3 in total

1.  The vancomycin soaking technique: no differences in autograft re-rupture rate. A comparative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Simone Perelli; Ferran Corcoll; Gonzalo Rojas; Verónica Montiel; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Allograft contamination during suture preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Chenliang Wu; Xiuyuan Zhang; Yi Qiao; Jiebo Chen; Wei Su; Junjie Xu; Zipeng Ye; Jia Jiang; Caiqi Xu; Guoming Xie; Jinzhong Zhao; Song Zhao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Lengths of the fixed loop and the adjustable loop in the coarse bone tunnel were compared to influence the widening of the femoral bone tunnel and the function of the knee joint].

Authors:  Y Yin; Y Mei; Z G Wang; S Y Song; P F Liu; P F He; W J Wu; X Xie
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.