Literature DB >> 2704499

Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries.

J R Green1, S L Soohoo.   

Abstract

Rectal injury during childbirth is a complication with potentially debilitating long-term consequences. Several factors have been suggested as influencing the risk of rectal injury. Among these are parity, infant birth weight, and various procedures performed by the birth attendant, including episiotomy. Whether episiotomies protect against or provoke laceration of the rectal sphincter and rectal mucosa is particularly controversial. Logistic analysis was used in an observational study of 2706 spontaneous cephalic deliveries to determine the risk of rectal injury for each of six explanatory factors, simultaneously controlling for the other factors. The adjusted risk for rectal injury was significantly increased for midline episiotomy (8.9 versus no episiotomy), nulliparity (3.3 versus parous), delivery by a physician (2.4 versus midwife), fetal macrosomia (2.4 versus normal weight), and delivery in a delivery room (2.0 versus labor bed). Compared with the risk for whites, significantly increased risk was found for Hispanic (1.9), Filipino (3.7), and Chinese (2.9) women. The practice of prophylactic midline episiotomy is questioned, and suggestions are offered for the design of experimental studies to resolve the questions raised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2704499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice.

Authors:  Steven M Minaglia; Begüm Ozel; Nicole M Gatto; Lisa Korst; Daniel R Mishell; David A Miller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-28

2.  Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour.

Authors:  Anupreet Dua; Melissa Whitworth; Annette Dugdale; Simon Hill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-08-01

Review 3.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care?

Authors:  Laura H Goetz; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

5.  Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Ho; Porjai Pattanittum; Robert P Japaraj; Tari Turner; Ussanee Swadpanich; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; C I Bartram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-02

7.  Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Third and fourth degree perineal injury after vaginal delivery: does race make a difference?

Authors:  Kanoe-Lehua de Silva; Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Leanne M Kon; Mark Hiraoka; Bruce Kessel; Todd Seto; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-03

9.  Disparities in rates of inpatient mortality and adverse events: race/ethnicity and language as independent contributors.

Authors:  Anika L Hines; Roxanne M Andrews; Ernest Moy; Marguerite L Barrett; Rosanna M Coffey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Adverse maternal outcomes associated with fetal macrosomia: what are the risk factors beyond birthweight?

Authors:  Florent Fuchs; Jean Bouyer; Patrick Rozenberg; Marie-Victoire Senat
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.