| Literature DB >> 27044323 |
Sonja K Heinrich1, Bettina Wachter1, Ortwin H K Aschenborn2, Susanne Thalwitzer1, Jörg Melzheimer1, Heribert Hofer1, Gábor Á Czirják3.
Abstract
Determining the immunological phenotype of endangered and threatened populations is important to identify those vulnerable to novel pathogens. Among mammals, members of the order Carnivora are particularly threatened by diseases. We therefore examined the constitutive innate immune system, the first line of protection against invading microbes, of six free-ranging carnivore species; the black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas), the brown hyena (Hyena brunnea), the caracal (Caracal caracal), the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), the leopard (Panthera pardus) and the lion (Panthera leo) using a bacterial killing assay. The differences in immune responses amongst the six species were independent of their foraging behaviour, body mass or social organisation but reflected their phylogenetic relatedness. The bacterial killing capacity of black-backed jackals, a member of the suborder Caniformia, followed the pattern established for a wide variety of vertebrates. In contrast, the five representatives of the suborder Feliformia demonstrated a killing capacity at least an order of magnitude higher than any species reported previously, with a particularly high capacity in caracals and cheetahs. Our results suggest that the immunocompetence of threatened felids such as the cheetah has been underestimated and its assessment ought to consider both innate and adaptive components of the immune system.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial killing assay; Canids; Carnivores; Constitutive innate immunity; Felids
Year: 2016 PMID: 27044323 PMCID: PMC4874346 DOI: 10.1242/bio.014902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Open ISSN: 2046-6390 Impact factor: 2.422
Foraging behaviour, diet, body mass and social organisation of the six examined carnivore species*
Fig. 1.BKA ranks of samples from different years. For cheetahs (A) and leopards (B). Numbers above boxplots represent sample sizes. Circles depict values more than 1.5 times the interquartile range below the first quartile. Changes between years were not significant.
Fig. 2.BKA ranks of the six carnivore species. Numbers above boxplots represent sample sizes. Circles depict values more than 1.5 times the interquartile range below the first quartile.
Fig. 3.Comparison of phylogenies derived from BKA values (this study) and the supertree reported by Nyakatura and Bininda-Emonds (2012). BKA results were hierarchically clustered with the centroid method (D'haeseleer, 2005).
Fig. 4.BKA values for different species. (A) Mean BKA values for eight serial dilutions of the six carnivore species from this study and four other species (a carnivore, a bird, a reptile and an amphibian) previously published. Values for published species are from Fig. 2A from French and Neuman-Lee (2012). (B) BKA values for eight serial dilutions of six carnivore species. Lines represent one randomly chosen individual per species. (C) BKA values for dilutions 1:70, 1:80 and 1:90 for 20 randomly selected cheetahs.