| Literature DB >> 27043581 |
Zhen Chen1, Yibing Xu2, Tao Liu3, Lining Zhang4, Hongbing Liu5, Huashi Guan6.
Abstract
Sargassum seaweeds produce abundant biomass in China and have long been used as herbal medicine and food. Their characteristic fatty acid (FA) profiles and related potential function in promoting cardiovascular health (CVH) have not been systematically investigated. In this study, FA profiles of four medicinal Sargassum were characterized using GC-MS. Principal component analysis was used to discriminate the four medicinal Sargassum, and orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis was carried out between the two official species HAI ZAO and between the two folk medicine species HAI QIAN. In all of the algae investigated, the major SFA and MUFA were palmitic and stearic acid, respectively, while the major PUFAs were linoleic, arachidonic, and eicosapentaenoic acid. S. fusiforme and S. horneri had higher concentrations of PUFAs. With respect to CVH, all of the studied species, particularly S. fusiforme, exhibited satisfactory levels such as PUFA/SFA ratio and n-6/n-3 ratio. Each species possesses a unique FA profile and is discriminated clearly. Potential key FA markers (between the two Chinese official species, and between the two folk species) are assessed. The study provides characteristic fatty acid profiles of four Chinese medicinal Sargassum and their related potential function in promoting CVH.Entities:
Keywords: Sargassum; chemometrics; fatty acid profile; marine traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27043581 PMCID: PMC4849072 DOI: 10.3390/md14040068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Total lipid contents of four Sargassum algae. The data are presented as means ± SD. Different letters (a,b) indicate significant differences by the Tukey post hoc test (p < 0.01).
Fatty acid profiles (given in % of total FAME) and nutritional indices related to CVH in different Sargassum species (expressed as means ± SD).
| Fatty Acid (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 5.33 ± 1.22 b | 6.70 ± 1.73 a | 5.90 ± 0.55 a,b | 5.23 ± 0.53 a,b |
| C15:0 | 0.51 ± 0.14 a,b | 0.58 ± 0.11 a | 0.42 ± 0.11 b | 0.41 ± 0.08 b |
| C16:0 | 31.44 ± 5.07 c | 48.66 ± 3.69 a | 35.02 ± 1.17 b | 38.86 ± 1.99 b |
| C17:0 | 0.28 ± 0.10 a | 0.25 ± 0.05 b | 0.20 ± 0.05 b | 0.16 ± 0.07 b |
| C18:0 | 1.95 ± 0.68 b | 2.79 ± 0.69 a | 1.65 ± 0.32 b | 2.02 ± 0.33 b |
| C20:0 | 0.86 ± 0.17 a | 0.80 ± 0.10 b | 0.71 ± 0.08 b | 0.68 ± 0.18 b |
| C22:0 | 1.15 ± 0.30 a | 1.07 ± 0.21 b | 0.64 ± 0.07 c | 0.84 ± 0.05 b,c |
| C24:0 | 0.18 ± 0.09 b | 0.28 ± 0.05 a | 0.17 ± 0.05 b,c | 0.11 ± 0.01 c |
| ∑SFA | 41.70 ± 6.88 c | 61.12 ± 4.80 a | 44.71 ± 1.41 b,c | 48.30 ± 1.83 b |
| C16:1 | 4.34 ± 0.98 c | 5.19 ± 0.70 b | 7.15 ± 0.88 a | 6.41 ± 0.37 a |
| C18:1 | 18.91 ± 1.49 a | 19.57 ± 1.38 a | 16.71 ± 0.88 b | 19.36 ± 0.47 a |
| C20:1 | 4.57 ± 0.82 a,b | 1.19 ± 0.31 c | 5.06 ± 1.04 a | 4.21 ± 0.20 b |
| C22:1 | 4.39 ± 1.13 a | 1.15 ± 0.26 c | 1.35 ± 0.19 c | 2.92 ± 0.75 b |
| ∑MUFA | 32.21 ± 1.91 a | 27.09 ± 1.18 c | 30.27 ± 1.44 b | 32.89 ± 1.07 a |
| C18:2 | 4.89 ± 0.63 b | 5.03 ± 1.66 b | 6.59 ± 0.99 a | 7.01 ± 0.97 a |
| C18:3 | 0.26 ± 0.08 b | 0.26 ± 0.14 b | 0.57 ± 0.31 a | 0.29 ± 0.09 b |
| C18:4 | 3.33 ± 2.11 a | 0.52 ± 0.33 b | 1.52 ± 0.64 b | 1.50 ± 0.53 b |
| C20:2 | 2.19 ± 0.49 b | 0.91 ± 0.23 c | 1.07 ± 0.30 c | 2.75 ± 0.20 a |
| C20:3 | 0.81 ± 0.31 a | 0.55 ± 0.31 b | 0.98 ± 0.21 a | 0.38 ± 0.15 b |
| C20:4 | 9.37 ± 3.38 a | 3.33 ± 1.53 b | 10.70 ± 1.19 a | 4.37 ± 0.77 b |
| C20:4 | 0.96 ± 0.28 a | 0.49 ± 0.22 b | 0.93 ± 0.07 a | 0.55 ± 0.24 b |
| C20:5 | 4.29 ± 2.10 a | 0.71 ± 0.43 c | 2.66 ± 0.53 b | 1.94 ± 0.46 b |
| ∑PUFA | 26.09 ± 7.97 a | 11.79 ± 4.62 c | 25.03 ± 2.10 a | 18.81 ± 1.88 b |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.67 ± 0.31 a | 0.20 ± 0.09 c | 0.56 ± 0.06 a,b | 0.39 ± 0.05 b,c |
| ∑ | 17.51 ± 3.72 a,b | 10.07 ± 3.70 c | 19.91 ± 1.78 a | 14.81 ± 0.88 b |
| ∑ | 8.58 ± 4.37 a | 1.71 ± 0.95 c | 5.11 ± 0.99 b | 4.00 ± 1.20 b,c |
| 2.43 ± 0.83 c | 7.17 ± 2.75 a | 4.03 ± 0.80 b | 3.98 ± 1.11 b,c | |
| UI A | 125.65 ± 32.25 a | 62.27 ± 15.05 c | 116.16 ± 5.77 a | 89.87 ± 7.44 b |
| AI B | 0.94 ± 0.28 b | 1.99 ± 0.45 a | 1.06 ± 0.06 b | 1.16 ± 0.10 b |
| TI C | 0.46 ± 0.21 b | 1.60 ± 0.56 a | 0.65 ± 0.07 b | 0.76 ± 0.14 b |
a–c Values in a row without a common superscript were significantly different at the 0.05 probability level; A UI (unsaturation index) was calculated by multiplying the percentage of each fatty acid by the number of double bonds, followed by summing up these contributions; B AI (atherogenic index): AI = [C12:0 + (4 × C14:0) + C16:0]/(∑MUFAs + n-3 PUFAs + n-6 PUFAs); C TI (thrombogenic index): TI = (C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0)/[(0.5 ×∑MUFAs) + (0.5 × n-6 PUFAs) + (3 × n-3 PUFAs) + (n-3 PUFAs/n-6 PUFAs)].
Figure 2The total ion chromatograms of the standard FAMEs mixture and Sargassum algal sample. (A) Standard FAMEs mixture; (B) Sample of S. fusiforme 1.
Figure 3Bi-plot of Sargassum samples obtained by the PCA of FA variables.
Figure 4OPLS-DA of the two official species HAI ZAO (S. fusiforme and S. pallidum). (A) Score scatter plot; (B) S-plot; (C) Potential key FA contents.
Figure 5OPLS-DA of the two folk medicine species HAI QIAN (S. horneri and S. thunbergii). (A) Score scatter plot; (B) S-plot; (C) Potential key FA contents.