Literature DB >> 27042338

Long-term healthcare use and costs in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a population-based cohort using linked health records (CALIBER).

Simon Walker1, Miqdad Asaria1, Andrea Manca1, Stephen Palmer1, Chris P Gale2, Anoop Dinesh Shah3, Keith R Abrams4, Michael Crowther5, Adam Timmis6, Harry Hemingway3, Mark Sculpher1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine long-term healthcare utilization and costs of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Linked cohort study of 94 966 patients with SCAD in England, 1 January 2001 to 31 March 2010, identified from primary care, secondary care, disease, and death registries. Resource use and costs, and cost predictors by time and 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile were estimated using generalized linear models. Coronary heart disease hospitalizations were 20.5% in the first year and 66% in the year following a non-fatal (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke) event. Mean healthcare costs were £3133 per patient in the first year and £10 377 in the year following a non-fatal event. First-year predictors of cost included sex (mean cost £549 lower in females), SCAD diagnosis (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction cost £656 more than stable angina), and co-morbidities (heart failure cost £657 more per patient). Compared with lower risk patients (5-year CVD risk 3.5%), those of higher risk (5-year CVD risk 44.2%) had higher 5-year costs (£23 393 vs. £9335) and lower lifetime costs (£43 020 vs. £116 888).
CONCLUSION: Patients with SCAD incur substantial healthcare utilization and costs, which varies and may be predicted by 5-year CVD risk profile. Higher risk patients have higher initial but lower lifetime costs than lower risk patients as a result of shorter life expectancy. Improved cardiovascular survivorship among an ageing CVD population is likely to require stratified care in anticipation of the burgeoning demand.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Electronic health records; Resource use; Stable coronary artery disease

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042338      PMCID: PMC4816202          DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes        ISSN: 2058-1742


Introduction

Improved survival coupled with a decline in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)[1,2] has dramatically changed the pattern of healthcare use over recent years.[3,4] Nowadays, patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), including patients with stable angina and those who have become stable after acute coronary syndrome (ACS),[5,6] are older and living longer and so make greater use of healthcare resources. Patients with SCAD might be considered to have ‘fallen off the radar’ of clinical interest: no longer in cardiac rehabilitation [mainly offered to those immediately after AMI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)], discharged from ongoing specialist care, and with suboptimal drug compliance, adherence, and persistence.[7] Such patients, however, vary widely in their risk of subsequent AMI or coronary death (∼10-fold, between top and bottom deciles of risk),[8] which will clearly have differential resource implications. While previous studies of resource use and cost have taken as a starting point AMI,[9,10] there is a paucity of information about the contemporary use and associated costs of healthcare beyond the initial hospital stay. In addition, existing studies in the area have been limited in a number of ways. First, as a result of the nature of their samples, they are not population based and do not reflect contemporary and routine clinical practice.[11] Second, they use overly simplistic models, typically restricting their analysis to a subset of SCAD index events and not evaluating how the pattern of healthcare resource use changes following a first post-SCAD myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke.[9,10] Third, no study has evaluated resource utilization and costs according to baseline cardiovascular risk, despite the importance of this information in improving decision-making and ensuring more efficient use of limited healthcare resources. Fourth, longer term and particularly lifetime implications of SCAD have not been quantified. These knowledge gaps have a number of important ramifications. They create uncertainty for those who need to forecast future care needs, restrain the research and development of new technologies and treatments for SCAD, and limit informed clinical decision-making. To address these limitations, our study aimed to (i) determine healthcare utilization and the associated costs in the first year with SCAD and in the year following a first non-fatal event (i.e. AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke), (ii) study predictors of costs in the first year of SCAD, and (iii) estimate the 5-year and lifetime costs among patients at low and high risk of subsequent events and coronary heart disease (CHD) death.

Methods

Data set and patient population

The ClinicAl research using Linked Bespoke studies and Electronic Records (CALIBER) e-health database was the data resource for this study. CALIBER links patient records from four different data sources: Clinical Practice Research Database (CPRD), Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES), and the Office for National Statistics. The data of CPRD were used to obtain heart rate measurements, demographic variables, and other risk factors. Primary care practices that provide valuable data to CPRD and cover ∼4% of UK population are representative in terms of demographic parameters such as gender, age, and ethnicity[12,13] and overall mortality[14] and have been validated for epidemiological research. A description of the CALIBER approach has been presented elsewhere.[15] Classification algorithms combining Read, International Classification of Disease 10 (ICD-10), drug, and procedure codes to define risk factors and endpoints are available at http://www.caliberresearch.org/portal/. Eligible patients were those with a diagnosis of stable angina, patients with a diagnosis of ACS within the study period (unstable angina or AMI), or those with a diagnosis of CHD in which there is no further specification of whether it is angina or MI (other CHD). Study start date was calculated from the date of diagnosis of stable angina or other CHD or from 6 months after an ACS or coronary intervention. The period of 6 months was chosen to differentiate long-term prognosis from the high-risk period that typically follows an ACS or revascularization. Diagnoses were identified in CPRD, HES, or MINAP records according to definitions given in the CALIBER data manual.[15] Patients were only eligible for the study during the period they were actively registered at a CPRD practice that was collecting up-to-standard data (according to CPRD measures of data quality and completeness), with follow-up ending if a patient transferred out of a CPRD practice. Full details of the cohort are available elsewhere.[8]

Healthcare utilization

Healthcare utilization extracted from the data set included primary care consultations, pharmaceutical prescriptions, inpatient stays, and diagnostic tests. Primary care consultations included all contacts between the patient and healthcare professionals captured in the CPRD data set. Prescription data were available from the CPRD data set and distinguished between drugs that were cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related and those that were not. Inpatient stays extracted from HES were based on Health Resource Group (HRG) codes and defined as CHD, CVD (including CHD and broader HRGs), or non-CVD related based on ICD-10 codes. Diagnostic tests as recorded in the primary care data set but not outpatient consultations were also extracted, the latter being due to the absence of outpatient HES data linkage.

Costs

All costs were calculated from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) in pound sterling based on 2011/12 prices. Costs were calculated by combining healthcare utilization data from CALIBER with associated unit costs that were taken from published UK sources.[16-18] For hospitalizations, costs are calculated based on finished consultant episodes in HES. Costs are presented in terms of total healthcare costs (all costs incurred), CHD costs (all CHD-related hospitalization costs, CVD-related drugs, and all primary care and diagnostic costs), and CVD costs (all CVD-related hospitalization costs, CVD-related drugs, and all primary care and diagnostic costs).

Analytical methods

Estimates of healthcare utilization and costs were calculated for the first year in the SCAD cohort and the first year following a non-fatal event during the follow-up period (AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke) with results reported as means and standard deviations, with medians and interquartile ranges reported in the appendices. Observations that were right censored for any reason other than mortality (i.e. those for which the data are incomplete for the year of interest, either first year with SCAD or first year following an event, but the reason for incompleteness was not death) were excluded from the analysis. A generalized linear model with a log link and gamma distribution was used to estimate the impact of baseline covariates on costs in the first year in the SCAD cohort to account for the non-linear impact of covariates and the right skewness in cost data. Covariates were based on those used by Rapsomaniki et al.,[8] which developed a prognostic model for SCAD patients, on the assumption that predictors of costs were likely linked to prognostic indicators. The covariates included the baseline diagnosis for entry to SCAD, co-morbidities, age, gender, smoking status, and biomarkers. Models were fitted on five multiply-imputed data sets and estimates combined using Rubin's rules.[19] The impact of covariates has been transformed back onto the natural scale to allow for ease of interpretation. Panel data methods with time invariant covariates were used to estimate patient costs over each 90-day period. Also estimated were the impact of events (non-fatal AMI, ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, CVD- and non-CVD-related death) on the costs in the period of the event and subsequent periods if the event was non-fatal. These costs were then combined with a state transition Markov model to estimate costs over a longer period. The model estimated the probabilities of, and mean times to, the first events of non-fatal AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, CVD- and non-CVD-related death, and subsequent CVD or non-CVD death following a non-fatal first event. These estimates were conditional on baseline covariates and were inferred from patient-level costs, covariates, survival, and events experienced. Full details of this model are available elsewhere with a brief description given in the appendix.[20] For the purpose of this article, the results of costs over time are presented for patients based on average covariate patterns for the 5-year risk deciles of a cardiovascular event. Discounted costs are also presented using a discount rate of 3.5% per annum.[21]

Results

Cohort

In total, 94 966 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria, of which 44% were female. The mean age of men and women included were 67 and 72 years, respectively. For the primary SCAD diagnosis, 47.4% of patients had stable angina, 13.5% unstable angina, 6.7% ST-elevation MI (STEMI), 9.7% non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and 22.6% had CHD not otherwise specified. Full details of the cohort can be found in Appendix Table . Figure  summarizes the SCAD cohort and the patient numbers used for each analysis. Stable coronary artery disease cohort. Table  reports healthcare utilization in the first year in the SCAD cohort and in the first year following a non-fatal event during the follow-up period (AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke). In the first year in the SCAD cohort, 20.5% of patients (n = 17 532) were hospitalized for CVD, and those who were hospitalized had a mean 1.9 stays (spells) in hospital with a mean length of stay of 4.6 days. In the year following a non-fatal event during follow-up, 66% of patients (n = 4354) were hospitalized for CHD. These patients spent a mean of 2.2 stays in hospital with a mean length of stay of 6.5 days. In the first year in SCAD, patients had a mean of 10.8 primary care appointments, and this increased to 13.7 in the first year following a non-fatal event. In the first year of SCAD, 88.2% of patients were taking cardiovascular medication, which decreased to 83.6% in the year following a non-fatal event. In the first year of SCAD, 5.7% of patients had a revascularization procedure, increasing to 13.5% of patients in the first year following a non-fatal event. Healthcare utilization in first year in the stable coronary artery disease cohort and first year following a non-fatal event during follow-up (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke) Table  reports costs for hospitalizations, primary care appointments, diagnostic tests, and drugs in patients in the first year in the SCAD cohort, and in the first year following a non-fatal event during follow-up (MI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke). The mean total healthcare costs in the first year in the SCAD cohort were £3133 per patient, of which 56.8% (£1780) and 70.2% (£2199) were related to CHD and CVD, respectively. This estimate increased to £10 377 per patient in the year following a non-fatal event during follow-up, of which 66.2% (£6869) and 85.9% (£8916) were related to CHD and CVD, respectively. The majority of healthcare costs were driven by hospitalizations (64.4% in the first year in the SCAD cohort and 84.2% in the year following a non-fatal event during follow-up). Costs in first year in the stable coronary artery disease cohort and in first year following an event during follow-up (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke)

Cost predictors in the first year in the stable coronary artery disease cohort

Figure  presents the results of the regression analysis showing the incremental costs associated with different covariates and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the first year in the SCAD cohort. Non-CVD-related co-morbidities had the largest impact on costs, with a history of renal disease associated with the largest increment of £1998 per patient (95% CI £1715–£2297). A history of heart failure resulted in an additional cost of £802 per patient (95% CI £683–£920). Of the baseline diagnoses for entry to the SCAD cohort, NSTEMI had the largest impact on cost with those patients with NSTEMI costing an additional £656 per patient (95% CI £473–£848) when compared with those with stable angina. Females were significantly less costly than males, being female was associated with a cost decrement of £549 per patient (95% CI −£638 to −£457). Figures and in the appendix present the same results for CVD- and CHD-related costs, respectively. Forest plot of incremental costs associated with covariates.

Estimated 90-day period and event costs

Tables , , and in the appendix provide estimates of total healthcare costs, CVD-related costs, and CHD-related costs, respectively, for a 90-day period based on a range of baseline characteristics. The tables also show the incremental costs in the period of an event and in subsequent periods for non-fatal events. For example, the background total healthcare costs for a male, mean age 69 years, with no co-morbidities would be £341 in the first 90 days, increasing by £10 for each subsequent 90-day period. If the patient had a non-fatal AMI, he would incur an incremental cost (on top of the normal period cost of £372) of £5028 in the 90 days following the AMI with the incremental costs decreasing in subsequent trimesters until 360 days after which there is an incremental cost of £521 per 90 days suggesting significant ongoing lifetime costs of events. Also of note, the incremental costs in the period of death from CVD- and non-CVD-related causes were £2008 and £2240, respectively.

Estimated costs over time for stable coronary artery disease

Table  presents estimates of 5-year and lifetime costs (total and CVD related, undiscounted and discounted) of the representative patients for each risk group. The covariate profiles used are shown in Appendix Table . Mean 5-year and lifetime costs for stable coronary artery disease patient population by cardiovascular risk decile aOf AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, or fatal CVD. bDiscounted at a rate of 3.5% per annum to calculate the present value of the costs. A patient with SCAD representative of the lowest risk decile (5-year cardiovascular risk of 3.5% and a life expectancy of 26.8 years) would have expected undiscounted costs of £9335 over 5 years, of which 44.7 and 56.8% would be CHD and CVD related, respectively; and undiscounted lifetime costs of £116 888, of which 40.1 and 61.5% would be CHD and CVD related, respectively. A representative patient of the highest risk decile (5-year cardiovascular risk of 44.2% and a life expectancy of 5.51 years) would have expected undiscounted costs of £23 391 over 5 years, of which 53.0 and 72.9% would be CHD and CVD related, respectively; and lifetime undiscounted costs of £43 020, of which 51.9 and 72.5% would be CHD and CVD related, respectively. Figure  shows the predicted total, CVD-related, and CHD-related costs and the survival curves over a 25-year period for representative patients of risk deciles 1 (lowest risk), 4, 7, and 10 (highest risk). Higher risk patients with SCAD have higher initial costs, which are overtaken by the lower risk patients as a result of higher mortality in the higher risk groups resulting in less time to accrue costs (5-year survivorship differs from 98.4% in risk decile 1 to 40.7% in risk decile 10; and 25-year survivorship differs from 58.2% in risk decile 1 to 0.5% in risk decile 10). Expected costs and survival over time for patients representative of risk deciles 1, 4, 7, and 10. CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; RG, risk decile.

Discussion

This study addresses a fundamental gap in knowledge relevant to clinicians and policymakers: what is the clinical, health service, and cost burden associated with SCAD? Using data from a large, contemporary, and representative population of patients from the England with SCAD, the analysis has shown that substantial healthcare costs are likely to be incurred as a result of improved ACS survivorship and the ageing population. Moreover, 5-year and lifetime costs vary according to CVD risk, which may be readily predicted from the baseline characteristics of patients that are routinely collected. High-risk patients have considerably higher costs over the initial 5 years but lower lifetime costs than lower risk patients as a result of shorter life expectancy. Patients with SCAD might be considered to have ‘fallen off the radar’ of clinical interest. Current guidelines give little information about how frequently and where such patients should be followed up or if and how they should be risk stratified.[5,6] Our results clearly highlight the unmet need and the shortfalls of current approaches—with high use of primary care and frequent hospitalizations, there are considerable ongoing costs. The number of primary care consultations, a mean of 10.8 per patient in the first year in the SCAD cohort, is higher than previous estimates for the overall population (5.5 per year).[22] In the first year in the SCAD cohort, over a third of patients were hospitalized (and 20.5% for CHD reasons). This is substantially higher than recent estimates for the general population in one area of the UK (14.9%),[23] and markedly higher than that in the general population for a similar age (23.4 and 21.2% of 60- to 74-year-old males and females, respectively, based on HES data). Healthcare utilization is, however, insufficient as a metric of the impact on the healthcare system. It is also important to consider the cost imposed on the NHS associated with those resources as this indicates the value of resources that cannot be devoted to health-enhancing activities for other patients. Mean costs of £3133 in the first year in the SCAD cohort are much higher than those in patients without chronic conditions (£293), but comparable with other chronic conditions (e.g. diabetes £3036).[23] Very high costs in the first year following a non-fatal event during follow-up (MI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke) (£10 377) are reflective of the healthcare utilization required to treat that event. Patients were stratified by risk to understand the costs accrued in greater detail. This higher resolution analysis allows the identification of where novel treatments and health service interventions have the greatest potential to be cost-effective. Non-CVD co-morbidities were common and had a major influence on costs with e.g. renal disease resulting in a mean extra cost of £1998 per patient in the first year of SCAD. This is an important finding when the presence of multiple co-morbidities has been shown to increase costs[23] yet clinicians tend to focus only on single diseases.[24] The panel data analysis examined the average cost per 90-day period with the disease and also the costs of events. The estimated incremental cost of a non-fatal MI over 1 year (£7677 ignoring mortality risk) was lower than some previous estimates from trial populations (e.g. among patients with stable angina the estimate of £9775 from the EUROPA trial).[11] However, this lower estimate may be reflective of less intensive use of healthcare resources in non-trial settings and should provide a more accurate representation of costs of these events in routine clinical practice. Estimated stroke costs in the first year of the event (£8902 for ischaemic and £10 477 for haemorrhagic stroke incremental to background costs) were similar to those seen in other studies. For example, the OXVASC study estimated mean total healthcare costs per patient in the first year following stroke at £10524.[25] Furthermore, a study of costs in the first year of SCAD and the first year following an event is of limited use to decision-makers who require more detailed information on the long-term costs and consequences of SCAD. This can be seen from the panel data analysis, which suggested ongoing long-term costs as a result of non-fatal events. By estimating 5-year and lifetime costs by CVD risk group, it was possible to examine the long-term cost implications as a result of the disease and future events. In the shorter term of 5 years, which is shorter than the life expectancy of even the highest risk group (although survivorship in this group was only 40.7% at 5 years), costs increased with cardiovascular risk, and were largely driven by the high number of fatal and non-fatal events among these patients. Over a lifetime, however, patients in the lower risk groups eventually had substantially higher costs than higher risk patients, primarily driven by greater life expectancy and, therefore, costs being incurred over a much longer period. This is a key finding of our research: increased survivorship as well as an increasingly co-morbid and older population will result in significant future healthcare costs. In turn, this has implications for the cost and therefore the cost-effectiveness of established and new SCAD treatments. Many studies have attempted to address the burden of disease in terms of health losses but fewer have examined the impact on financial costs of disease. Our research used SCAD as an exemplar in estimating resource use and costs from ‘real world’ electronic health record data. The methods used here could be readily applied to other chronic diseases to help produce evidence of their resource and cost implications to better inform clinicians and decision-makers. This would reduce uncertainty for those who need to forecast future care needs and allow for better focused research and development of new technologies and treatments for these chronic diseases as well as resulting in better informed clinical decision-making.

Limitations

While our study has a number of strengths including the multi-source electronic health record linkage, there are a number of limitations. In addition to being censored at 2010, after which there have been further improvements in the care and survivorship of SCAD, a key weakness of this study was the exclusion of outpatient appointment costs that cannot currently be linked from HES. As a result, the total healthcare costs of this population are underestimated. Further disaggregation of primary care costs into CHD and CVD related was not possible and therefore in each category all primary care costs have been included and therefore are likely overestimated. The estimation of lifetime costs has also involved extrapolation over a longer time period than is currently observed in the CALIBER data. This extrapolation is subject to considerable uncertainty. The SCAD population is also inherently heterogeneous, and there may be value in further disaggregation of the population in future research.

Conclusions

Using a multi-source electronic health record approach, this study provides, for the first time, estimates and predictors of contemporary national healthcare utilization and costs in the first year of SCAD and the first year following an event. It reveals that patients with SCAD incur substantial healthcare utilization and costs, which vary and may be predicted by 5-year CVD risk profiles. While high-risk patients incur substantially higher costs over the short term (5 years), low-risk patients incur higher lifetime costs as a result of greater life expectancy. Improved cardiovascular survivorship and an ageing UK population will require stratified care in anticipation of the burgeoning economic demand. The methods used here could be readily applied to other chronic diseases to better inform clinical decision-making.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and several drafts of the manuscript. S.W., M.A., A.M., S.P., and M.S. conducted the statistical analysis and developed the model used to estimate long-term costs. A.D.S., K.A., M.C., C.P.G., A.T., and H.H. provided advice throughout the process. A.T. and H.H. were responsible for the overall grant from the NIHR.
Table 1

Healthcare utilization in first year in the stable coronary artery disease cohort and first year following a non-fatal event during follow-up (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke)

Resource use in first year (n= 85 702)Resource in first year following an event (n = 6599)
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Hospitalizations
 Hospitalized (%)37.6 (0.484)83.5 (0.371)
 Hospitalized for CVD (%)27 (0.444)80.2 (0.399)
 Hospitalized for CHD (%)20.5 (0.403)66 (0.474)
 Inpatient stays0.875 (4.421)2.364 (6.425)
 Inpatient stays for CVD0.503 (2.545)1.931 (5.284)
 Inpatient stays for CHD0.343 (1.321)1.434 (3.315)
With any hospitalization n = 32 242 n = 5512
 Inpatient stays2.325 (6.971)2.83 (6.935)
 Length of stay6.717 (17.583)14.857 (20.349)
With any hospitalization for CVD n = 23 160 n = 5291
 Inpatient stays for CVD1.862 (4.631)2.408 (5.803)
 Length of stay7.516 (12.757)15.541 (20.939)
With any hospitalization for CHD n = 17 532 n = 4354
 Inpatient stays for CHD1.674 (2.51)2.174 (3.88)
 Length of stay4.579 (7.617)6.515 (10.857)
Revascularizations
 Any revascularization (%)5.7 (0.232)13.5 (0.341)
 PCI (%)3 (0.17)9.1 (0.287)
 CABG (%)2.9 (0.169)5 (0.218)
Primary care consultations10.768 (10.857)13.671 (15.407)
Drugs
 Patients on any drugs (%)91.3 (0.281)85.1 (0.356)
 Patients on CVD drugs (%)88.2 (0.322)83.6 (0.37)
 Patients on anticoagulants (%)8.7 (0.282)14.7 (0.354)
 Patients on ACEi or ARB (%)47.7 (0.499)61.5 (0.487)
 Patients on anti-platelets (%)65.6 (0.475)76.3 (0.425)
 Patients on β-blockers (%)46 (0.498)50.1 (0.5)
 Patients on calcium channel blockers (%)31.5 (0.464)32.6 (0.469)
Table 2

Costs in first year in the stable coronary artery disease cohort and in first year following an event during follow-up (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke)

Costs in first year (n = 85 702)Costs in first year following an event (n = 6599)
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Total costs
 Total cost (£)3133 (6101)10 377 (12 260)
 Total CVD cost (£)2199 (4632)8916 (10 930)
 Total CHD costs (£)1780 (3686)6869 (9467)
Hospitalizations
 Inpatient costs (£)2018 (5632)8744 (11 554)
 Inpatient CVD costs (£)1487 (4493)7957 (10 796)
 Inpatient CHD costs (£)1067 (3548)5910 (9338)
Primary care costs (£)466 (463)589 (629)
Diagnostic test costs (£)141 (232)228 (311)
Drugs
 All drug costs (£)508 (1548)816 (3135)
 CVD drug costs (£)105 (113)142 (175)
Table 3

Mean 5-year and lifetime costs for stable coronary artery disease patient population by cardiovascular risk decile

ResultsRisk group
12345678910
5-year riska (%)3.465.436.958.5310.3612.5715.6420.0727.2344.18
Average age (years)52596265687073768084
Life expectancy (years)26.8119.6217.3415.6314.2613.0311.9210.488.525.51
Total 5-year costs (£)933511 20012 30813 51214 64415 93017 66019 60921 61723 391
Discounted total 5-year costsb (£)849510 20411 22112 32713 36814 55416 15317 96319 85321 620
Total 5-year CVD costs (£)5306695979418954987410 90412 24213 74215 38017 050
Discounted total 5-year CVD costsb (£)48236338723881689014996211 19712 58914 12615 759
Total 5-year CHD costs (£)417255436354715378678583944910 38511 37612 392
Discounted total 5-year CHD costsb (£)3801505758016534719178508651952110 45511 459
Total lifetime costs (£)116 88881 49073 05768 10264 52162 03461 43559 44654 34543 020
Discounted total lifetime costsb62 21050 86448 04646 53545 42944 78545 28344 90342 43635 549
Total lifetime CVD costs (£)71 94352 03447 68145 25143 43842 26642 30141 36638 41031 199
Discounted total lifetime CVD costsb (£)37 85732 33131 28830 89630 58430 53131 21131 28130 02425 801
Total lifetime CHD costs (£)46 92136 06933 89232 69331 74130 94430 79329 88527 53322 324
Discounted total lifetime CHD costsb (£)25 31622 86822 63922 67222 65722 61922 94622 77821 64618 522

aOf AMI, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, or fatal CVD.

bDiscounted at a rate of 3.5% per annum to calculate the present value of the costs.

Table A1

Patient characteristics

Socio-demographic characteristics
Sex (% female)44
Age (if male) (years)67
Age (if female) (years)72
Most deprived quintile (%)20
Baseline diagnoses for entry to the SCAD cohort
 NSTEMI (%)10
 STEMI (%)7
 Unstable angina (%)14
 Stable angina (%)47
 CHD not otherwise specified (%)23
CVD risk factors
 Current smoker (%)35
 Ex-smoker (%)32
 Never smoked (%)33
 Hypertension (%)76
 Diabetes (%)16
CVD co-morbidities
 Heart failure (%)26
 Atrial fibrillation (%)15
 Peripheral arterial disease (%)8
 Stroke (%)9
Table A2

Healthcare utilization in first year with stable coronary artery disease and first year following a non-fatal event (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke)

Mean (SD)Median (IQR)
Resource use in first year (n = 85 702)
Hospitalizations
 Hospitalized (%)37.6 (0.484)0 (0–1)
 Hospitalized for CVD (%)27 (0.444)0 (0–1)
 Hospitalized for CHD (%)20.5 (0.403)0 (0–1)
 Inpatient stays0.875 (4.421)0 (0–3)
 Inpatient stays for CVD0.503 (2.545)0 (0–2)
 Inpatient stays for CHD0.343 (1.321)0 (0–2)
With any hospitalization (n = 32 242)
 Inpatient stays2.325 (6.971)1 (1–5)
 Length of stay6.717 (17.583)3 (1–23)
With any hospitalization for CVD (n = 23 160)
 Inpatient stays for CVD1.862 (4.631)1 (1–4)
 Length of stay7.516 (12.757)3.667 (1–26)
With any hospitalization for CHD (n = 17 532)
 Inpatient stays for CHD1.674 (2.51)1 (1–4)
 Length of stay4.579 (7.617)2 (1–14.75)
Revascularizations
 Any revascularization (%)5.7 (0.232)0 (0–1)
 PCI (%)3 (0.17)0 (0–0)
 CABG (%)2.9 (0.169)0 (0–0)
Primary care consultations10.768 (10.857)8 (0–30)
Drugs
 Patients on any drugs (%)91.3 (0.281)1 (0–1)
 Patients on CVD drugs (%)88.2 (0.322)1 (0–1)
 Patients on anticoagulants (%)8.7 (0.282)0 (0–1)
 Patients on ACEi or ARB (%)47.7 (0.499)0 (0–1)
 Patients on anti-platelets (%)65.6 (0.475)1 (0–1)
 Patients on β-blockers (%)46 (0.498)0 (0–1)
 Patients on calcium channel blockers (%)31.5 (0.464)0 (0–1)
Resource in first year following an event (n = 6599)
Hospitalizations
 Hospitalized (%)83.5 (0.371)1 (0–1)
 Hospitalized for CVD (%)80.2 (0.399)1 (0–1)
 Hospitalized for CHD (%)66 (0.474)1 (0–1)
 Inpatient stays2.364 (6.425)1 (0–6)
 Inpatient stays for CVD1.931 (5.284)1 (0–5)
 Inpatient stays for CHD1.434 (3.315)1 (0–4)
With any hospitalization (n = 5512)
 Inpatient stays2.83 (6.935)2 (1–6)
 Length of stay14.857 (20.349)8.5 (1.5–50.5)
With any hospitalization for CVD (n = 5291)
 Inpatient stays for CVD2.408 (5.803)2 (1–5)
 Length of stay15.541 (20.939)9 (2–52)
With any hospitalization for CHD (n = 4354)
 Inpatient stays for CHD2.174 (3.88)1 (1–5)
 Length of stay6.515 (10.857)3.5 (1–21.5)
Revascularizations
 Any revascularization (%)13.5 (0.341)0 (0–1)
 PCI (%)9.1 (0.287)0 (0–1)
 CABG (%)5 (0.218)0 (0–1)
Primary care consultations13.671 (15.407)11 (0–38)
Drugs
 Patients on any drugs (%)85.1 (0.356)1 (0–1)
 Patients on CVD drugs (%)83.6 (0.37)1 (0–1)
 Patients on anticoagulants (%)14.7 (0.354)0 (0–1)
 Patients on ACEi or ARB (%)61.5 (0.487)1 (0–1)
 Patients on anti-platelets (%)76.3 (0.425)1 (0–1)
 Patients on β-blockers (%)50.1 (0.5)1 (0–1)
 Patients on calcium channel blockers (%)32.6 (0.469)0 (0–1)
Table A3

Costs in first year with stable coronary artery disease and in first year following an event (myocardial infarction, ischaemic of haemorrhagic stroke)

Mean (SD) (£)Median (IQR) (£)
Costs in first year (n = 85 702)
 Total costs
  Total cost3133 (6101)1149 (43–12 641)
  Total CVD cost2199 (4632)735 (0–10 274)
  Total CHD costs1780 (3686)685 (0–8413)
 Hospitalizations
  Inpatient costs2018 (5632)0 (0–10 603)
  Inpatient CVD costs1487 (4493)0 (0–9333)
  Inpatient CHD costs1067 (3548)0 (0–7284)
 Primary care costs466 (463)361 (0–1291)
 Diagnostic test costs141 (232)70 (0–538)
 Drugs
  All drug costs508 (1548)209 (0–1698)
  CVD drug costs105 (113)84 (0–272)
Costs in first year following an event (n = 6599)
 Total costs
  Total cost10 377 (12 260)6855 (580–30 755)
  Total CVD cost8916 (10 930)5819 (384–27 279)
  Total CHD costs6869 (9467)3972 (159–23 336)
 Hospitalizations
  Inpatient costs8744 (11 554)5421 (0–27 436)
  Inpatient CVD costs7957 (10 796)4871 (0–25 843)
  Inpatient CHD costs5910 (9338)3127 (0–22 020)
 Primary care costs589 (629)456 (0–1664)
 Diagnostic test costs228 (311)131 (0–806)
 Drugs
  All drug costs816 (3135)293 (0–2924)
  CVD drug costs142 (175)110 (0–376)
Table A4

Total healthcare costs per 90-day period

Coefficient (£)Standard errorLower 95% CI (£)Upper 95% CI (£)
Background cost per 90 days
 Baseline (for a man aged 69 with stable angina and no other co-morbidities)34110.15322361
 Baseline age (centred)70.4267
 Female−710.09−2613
 Increase per 90 days100.181011
 SCAD diagnosis (relative to stable angina)
  Other CHD−2012.40−445
  NSTEMI15718.37121193
  STEMI−2621.48−6817
  Unstable angina15314.92124183
 CVD co-morbidities
  History of heart failure36412.23340388
  History of atrial fibrillation18614.32158214
  History of PAD32717.80292362
 Non-CVD co-morbidities
  Diabetes33813.71312365
  History of liver disease53050.70431629
  History of COPD23111.58208254
  History of cancer33117.51296365
  History of renal disease75620.93715797
Incremental cost of non-fatal MI
 Cost in first 90-day period502834.414961£5096
 Cost in second 90-day period128236.841210£1354
 Cost in third 90-day period67539.15598£751
 Cost in fourth 90-day period69240.84612£772
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods52118.64484£557
Additional incremental cost of non-fatal MI for patients with diabetes
 Additional cost in first 90-day period77675.79627924
 Cost in second 90-day period110081.569401260
 Cost in third 90-day period78587.01614955
 Cost in fourth 90-day period55090.87372728
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods36942.16286451
Incremental cost of non-fatal ischaemic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period621536.0161446285
 Cost in second 90-day period123938.0311641313
 Cost in third 90-day period79541.05714875
 Cost in fourth 90-day period65443.12569738
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods56419.97525604
Incremental cost of non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period7011125.4167657257
 Cost in second 90-day period1767138.8014952039
 Cost in third 90-day period947155.226431252
 Cost in fourth 90-day period751165.144281075
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods92774.207821073
Cost of fatal events
 Fatal CVD event200824.8819602057
 Fatal non-CVD event224020.1622012280
Table A5

Total cardiovascular disease-related healthcare costs

Coefficient (£)Standard errorLower 95% CI (£)Upper 95% CI (£)
Background cost per 90 days
 Baseline (for a man aged 69 with stable angina and no other co-morbidities)2247.74209239
 Baseline age (centred)60.3267
 Female−237.65−38−8
 Increase per 90 days70.1567
 SCAD diagnosis (relative to stable angina)
  Other CHD29.39−1621
  NSTEMI14513.66119172
  STEMI2915.77−260
  Unstable angina12511.32103147
 CVD co-morbidities
  History of heart failure2489.29230266
  History of atrial fibrillation22110.90199242
  History of PAD24213.53216269
 Non-CVD co-morbidities
  Diabetes19410.43173214
  History of liver disease27938.68203355
  History of COPD1428.79124159
  History of cancer15413.34128180
  History of renal disease41816.07386449
Incremental cost of non-fatal MI
 Cost in first 90-day period485429.5547964911
 Cost in second 90-day period120931.6411471271
 Cost in third 90-day period64033.63574706
 Cost in fourth 90-day period67535.08606744
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods48115.64451512
Additional incremental cost of non-fatal MI for patients with diabetes
 Additional cost in first 90-day period67465.05546801
 Cost in second 90-day period104270.029041179
 Cost in third 90-day period66074.71514807
 Cost in fourth 90-day period40378.04250556
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods28035.33210349
Incremental cost of non-fatal ischaemic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period595730.9558976018
 Cost in second 90-day period115132.6910871215
 Cost in third 90-day period67535.29606744
 Cost in fourth 90-day period53937.08466612
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods44816.86415481
Incremental cost of non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period6836107.7366257047
 Cost in second 90-day period1517119.2812841751
 Cost in third 90-day period585133.45324847
 Cost in fourth 90-day period393142.02115671
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods67062.69547792
Cost of fatal events
 Fatal CVD event207121.3020292113
 Fatal non-CVD event173717.2817031771
Table A6

Total coronary heart disease-related healthcare costs

Coefficient (£)Standard errorLower 95% CI (£)Upper 95% CI (£)
Background cost per 90 days
 Baseline (for a man aged 69 with stable angina and no other co-morbidities)1795.93167191
 Baseline age (centred)40.2445
 Female−235.85−35−12
 Increase per 90 days40.1234
 SCAD diagnosis (relative to stable angina)
  Other CHD827.176897
  NSTEMI21910.49198239
  STEMI11112.0488135
  Unstable angina1638.65146179
 CVD co-morbidities
  History of heart failure1437.11129157
  History of atrial fibrillation848.3467100
  History of PAD16110.35141181
 Non-CVD co-morbidities
  Diabetes1447.98128160
  History of liver disease19829.62140256
  History of COPD1176.72104131
  History of cancer10710.2187127
  History of renal disease20112.34176225
Incremental cost of non-fatal MI
 Cost in first 90-day period465823.6946124705
 Cost in second 90-day period116625.3611161215
 Cost in third 90-day period59026.96538643
 Cost in fourth 90-day period64228.13587697
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods47512.40451500
Additional incremental cost of non-fatal MI for patients with dibetes
 Additional cost in first 90-day period64352.14541745
 Cost in second 90-day period79256.13682902
 Cost in third 90-day period70159.90584819
 Cost in fourth 90-day period33062.57207453
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods26928.01215324
Incremental cost of non-fatal ischaemic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period302924.8229813078
 Cost in second 90-day period62026.22568671
 Cost in third 90-day period41528.31359470
 Cost in fourth 90-day period26229.74203320
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods25613.42230282
Incremental cost of non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke
 Cost in first 90-day period287486.3827043043
 Cost in second 90-day period79095.66602977
 Cost in third 90-day period218107.048428
 Cost in fourth 90-day period301113.9277524
 Cost in subsequent 90-day periods25149.89154349
Cost of fatal events
 Fatal CVD event140717.0613741441
 Fatal non-CVD event106813.8410401095
Table A7

Covariate profiles based on deciles of 5-year risk

Patient average covariate profiles based on deciles of 5-year risk of composite CVD first event
 Risk decile12345678910
 5-year risk (average)3.69%5.70%7.37%9.15%11.20%13.71%17.14%22.14%30.42%52.37%
 Re-calculated 5-year risk3.46%5.43%6.95%8.53%10.36%12.57%15.64%20.07%27.23%44.18%
Socio-demographic characteristics
 Sex (female)64%48%42%39%37%37%38%42%44%46%
 Age (if male)49555962656771747781
 Age (if female)53626770737578808387
 Age (weighted average)52596265687073768084
 Most deprived quintile15%17%18%19%20%21%21%22%22%24%
SCAD diagnosis and severity
 Other CHD11%17%20%22%24%24%25%26%25%20%
 NSTEMI0%1%3%5%8%10%12%17%23%43%
 STEMI1%4%8%12%13%14%13%9%6%4%
 Unstable angina10%13%12%12%12%12%13%15%17%15%
 Stable angina78%65%56%49%43%39%37%34%29%18%
 PCI in last 6 months9%12%13%14%13%13%11%9%6%4%
 CABG in last 6 months9%7%6%5%5%4%4%3%2%1%
 Previous/recurrent MI2%6%10%14%18%23%26%29%32%43%
 Use of nitrates10%16%19%21%24%28%33%37%43%56%
CVD risk factors
 Current smoker31%35%36%37%38%38%37%35%32%30%
 Ex-smoker27%30%31%32%32%33%34%34%34%34%
 Never smoked41%35%33%31%30%29%29%31%33%36%
 Hypertension69%70%71%71%72%74%76%79%83%87%
 Diabetes4%8%10%12%14%16%18%21%24%32%
 Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.954.914.844.794.744.744.704.684.644.54
 HDL (mmol/L)1.411.371.351.351.351.351.361.371.371.35
CVD co-morbidities
 Heart failure5%7%9%12%15%19%27%37%52%73%
 Peripheral arterial disease1%2%3%4%6%8%10%13%16%25%
 Atrial fibrillation3%5%7%9%10%13%16%21%29%43%
 Stroke0%1%1%2%3%5%8%14%22%39%
Non-CVD co-morbidities
 Chronic kidney disease2%2%3%4%4%5%7%9%12%20%
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease20%20%20%21%22%23%25%27%28%30%
 Cancer4%5%6%7%8%9%11%13%14%12%
 Chronic liver disease0%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%1%
Psychosocial characteristics
 Depression at diagnosis20%17%15%15%14%14%15%17%18%21%
 Anxiety at diagnosis7%6%6%7%7%7%8%8%10%12%
Biomarkers
 Heart rate (b.p.m.)72717171717172737476
 Creatinine (mmol/L)8892959698100101104109125
 White cell count (109/L)6.817.057.197.317.447.547.627.767.888.22
 Haemoglobin (g/100 mL)14.2614.2614.1614.0513.8813.7013.4813.1612.8112.20
  18 in total

1.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  D B Mark; C D Naylor; M A Hlatky; R M Califf; E J Topol; C B Granger; J D Knight; C L Nelson; K L Lee; N E Clapp-Channing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Resolving inequalities in care? Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003-2010.

Authors:  Chris P Gale; B A Cattle; A Woolston; P D Baxter; T H West; A D Simms; J Blaxill; D C Greenwood; K A A Fox; R M West
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  A population-based study of hospital care costs during 5 years after transient ischemic attack and stroke.

Authors:  Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Alastair M Gray; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Prognostic models for stable coronary artery disease based on electronic health record cohort of 102 023 patients.

Authors:  Eleni Rapsomaniki; Anoop Shah; Pablo Perel; Spiros Denaxas; Julie George; Owen Nicholas; Ruzan Udumyan; Gene Solomon Feder; Aroon D Hingorani; Adam Timmis; Liam Smeeth; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Use of relative survival to evaluate non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction quality of care and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Marlous Hall; Oras A Alabas; Tatendashe B Dondo; Tomas Jernberg; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2015-11-01

8.  Trends in hospital treatments, including revascularisation, following acute myocardial infarction, 2003-2010: a multilevel and relative survival analysis for the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR).

Authors:  C P Gale; V Allan; B A Cattle; A S Hall; R M West; A Timmis; H H Gray; J Deanfield; K A A Fox; R Feltbower
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Data resource profile: cardiovascular disease research using linked bespoke studies and electronic health records (CALIBER).

Authors:  Spiros C Denaxas; Julie George; Emily Herrett; Anoop D Shah; Dipak Kalra; Aroon D Hingorani; Mika Kivimaki; Adam D Timmis; Liam Smeeth; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 10.  Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs.

Authors:  Christine Vogeli; Alexandra E Shields; Todd A Lee; Teresa B Gibson; William D Marder; Kevin B Weiss; David Blumenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  19 in total

1.  Using Linked Electronic Health Records to Estimate Healthcare Costs: Key Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Miqdad Asaria; Katja Grasic; Simon Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A Systematic Review of Direct Cardiovascular Event Costs: An International Perspective.

Authors:  Steve Ryder; Kathleen Fox; Pratik Rane; Nigel Armstrong; Ching-Yun Wei; Sohan Deshpande; Lisa Stirk; Yi Qian; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Simon Walker; Tracey Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Future Offspring Costs in Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Evelyn Verbeke; Jeroen Luyten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Multimorbidity and survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction in England and Wales: Latent class analysis of a nationwide population-based cohort.

Authors:  Marlous Hall; Tatendashe B Dondo; Andrew T Yan; Mamas A Mamas; Adam D Timmis; John E Deanfield; Tomas Jernberg; Harry Hemingway; Keith A A Fox; Chris P Gale
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Tim Doran; Jinyi Zhu; Simon Walker; Emily Arntson; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  James Lomas; Miqdad Asaria; Laura Bojke; Chris P Gale; Gerry Richardson; Simon Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-12

Review 8.  Validity of inducible ischaemia as a surrogate for adverse outcomes in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Adam Timmis; Antony Raharja; R Andrew Archbold; Anthony Mathur
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Tai Chi Is a Promising Exercise Option for Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Declining Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Peter M Wayne; Shira Dunsiger; Julie Krol; Christopher Breault; Beth C Bock; Wen-Chih Wu; Gloria Y Yeh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Personalising the decision for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy: development, validation and potential impact of prognostic models for cardiovascular events and bleeding in myocardial infarction survivors.

Authors:  Laura Pasea; Sheng-Chia Chung; Mar Pujades-Rodriguez; Alireza Moayyeri; Spiros Denaxas; Keith A A Fox; Lars Wallentin; Stuart J Pocock; Adam Timmis; Amitava Banerjee; Riyaz Patel; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 35.855

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.