Literature DB >> 27042293

Brainhack: a collaborative workshop for the open neuroscience community.

R Cameron Craddock1, Daniel S Margulies2, Pierre Bellec3, B Nolan Nichols4, Sarael Alcauter5, Fernando A Barrios5, Yves Burnod6, Christopher J Cannistraci7, Julien Cohen-Adad8, Benjamin De Leener9, Sebastien Dery10, Jonathan Downar11, Katharine Dunlop12, Alexandre R Franco13, Caroline Seligman Froehlich14, Andrew J Gerber15, Satrajit S Ghosh16, Thomas J Grabowski17, Sean Hill18, Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld19, R Matthew Hutchison20, Prantik Kundu21, Angela R Laird22, Sook-Lei Liew23, Daniel J Lurie24, Donald G McLaren25, Felipe Meneguzzi19, Maarten Mennes26, Salma Mesmoudi27, David O'Connor28, Erick H Pasaye5, Scott Peltier29, Jean-Baptiste Poline30, Gautam Prasad31, Ramon Fraga Pereira19, Pierre-Olivier Quirion32, Ariel Rokem33, Ziad S Saad34, Yonggang Shi31, Stephen C Strother35, Roberto Toro36, Lucina Q Uddin37, John D Van Horn38, John W Van Meter39, Robert C Welsh40, Ting Xu28.   

Abstract

Brainhack events offer a novel workshop format with participant-generated content that caters to the rapidly growing open neuroscience community. Including components from hackathons and unconferences, as well as parallel educational sessions, Brainhack fosters novel collaborations around the interests of its attendees. Here we provide an overview of its structure, past events, and example projects. Additionally, we outline current innovations such as regional events and post-conference publications. Through introducing Brainhack to the wider neuroscience community, we hope to provide a unique conference format that promotes the features of collaborative, open science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaboration; Data sharing; Hackathon; Networking; Neuroscience; Open science; Unconference

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042293      PMCID: PMC4818387          DOI: 10.1186/s13742-016-0121-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Introducing Brainhack

Open science promotes collaboration through the transparent dissemination of ideas, tools, and data, with the goal of accelerating the pace of discovery. Although scientific conferences and workshops seem like a natural medium for brain researchers to meet and exchange ideas, in practice these events, often structured around the lecturer–audience paradigm, do not always provide sufficient flexibility or free time to fully exploit their potential. Borne from the technology sector, ‘unconferences’ and ‘hackathons’ are alternative meeting formats that emphasize the full participation of all attendees. Rather than having a prearranged program, the content presented at unconferences is dynamically determined by attendees, while hackathons feature unstructured time during which teams of participants collaborate intensively on various projects. These meeting formats have enabled rapid advances in computing technologies since the late 1990s, but they have yet to be widely adopted in academic research. Now in their fourth year, international and regional Brainhack events bring together brain enthusiasts from a variety of backgrounds to build relationships, learn from one another, and collaborate on projects related to the neurosciences. Unlike traditional hackathons that tend to focus on computer programming, projects at Brainhacks can be completed using a much broader array of methods. Time is set aside for periodic unconference sessions whose content is determined on-site by the participants. The unconference sessions can feature different styles of presentations, including but not limited to: updates on ongoing projects, ideas that could seed future collaborations, panel discussions, or tutorials. In consideration of the ever expanding interest in the tools of open science, Brainhack has developed an educational component that runs in parallel with the hacking sessions in order to introduce the basic tools of open collaboration. This combined model encourages active participation and interaction between attendees, while also maximizing the topical relevance of the more formally presented content (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Brainhack [1] is composed of various organizational features from ‘unconferences’ and ‘hackathons,’ and includes a variety of scheduling components to encourage collaboration and introduction to open science methods

Brainhack [1] is composed of various organizational features from ‘unconferences’ and ‘hackathons,’ and includes a variety of scheduling components to encourage collaboration and introduction to open science methods There is no ideal background, skill set, or experience level required for Brainhack attendees. Fully translating neuroscience data to knowledge requires expertise that spans biology, computer science, engineering, informatics, mathematics, neuroanatomy, philosophy, physics, psychiatry, psychology, statistics, art, and many others. The goal of a Brainhack event is to facilitate the cross-pollination of ideas and knowledge across these various disciplines and communities to accelerate the development of a richer understanding of the brain. In addition to sharing data and tools, attendees can contribute in a variety of ways. Philosophical debates about the meanings of cognition, coordinated efforts to manually segment brain images from different species, curating neuroscience literature, or helping others to understand the subtleties of diagnosing a developmental disorder are all examples of valuable contributions that have emerged at Brainhacks in the past (for further examples, see Table 1).
Table 1

Selected examples of Brainhack projects

∙ A child psychiatrist and a 3D video artist initiated a collaboration at the 2012 Brainhack to develop a movie to be shown to participants during resting-state fMRI scans to reduce head motion in hyperkinetic populations [5, 6].
∙ The ABIDE Preprocessing Initiative [7] is an ongoing project started at the 2012 Brainhack to share preprocessed versions of the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset [8, 9]. This project is sharing functional data that have been processed using the Connectome Computation System (CCS) [10, 11], the Configurable Pipeline for the Analysis of Connectomes (C-PAC) [12, 13], the Data Preprocessing Assistant for Resting State fMRI (DPARSF) [14, 15], and the Neuro Imaging Analysis Kit (NIAK) [16, 17], as well as cortical thickness measures extracted from structural data using FreeSurfer [18, 19], CIVET [20, 21], and Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS) [22, 23].
∙ A collaboration started at the 2012 Brainhack performed an analysis to identify differences in cortical thickness and structural covariance between individuals with autism spectrum disorder and neurotypical controls [24].
∙ A project team at Brainhack 2013 amassed a dataset of 14,781 structural MRI scans to estimate the distribution of brain sizes across individuals for optimizing scan acquisition parameters [25].
∙ The development team of LORIS, an open source database system for neuroimaging and phenotypic data, have repeatedly used Brainhack as an opportunity to meet and collaborate on new features [26].
∙ An early version of the Daydreaming app [27], an Android application for real-time assessment of users’ mind-wandering, was developed at Brainhack 2013.
∙ The Clubs of Science [28] project, founded at Brainhack MTL 2015, has built a web-based visualization of the social web underlying neuroimaging research.
∙ The linkRbrain [29] tool for integrating and querying neuroimaging data with activation peaks from the literature and gene expression data was partially developed and first tested at Brainhack 2013 in Paris [30].

Further projects can be found at https://www.brainhack.org [1]

Selected examples of Brainhack projects Further projects can be found at https://www.brainhack.org [1]

Hackathons based on collaboration, not competition

The hackathon format gained prominence in the technology sector by providing a meeting model that targets specific project goals during intense time-limited collaborations. The competitive aspect of the traditional hackathon, while catalyzing rapid advances toward specific technology ends, is contrary to the founding principle of Brainhack, which is to encourage open, cross-institutional, and inter-disciplinary collaboration. Rather than subdividing attendees into competitive factions, Brainhack attendees are encouraged to work together in collaborative teams to solve problems of their choosing. In this way, rather than obtaining many solutions to a single problem, we aim to produce various solutions to many problems. Most importantly, we encourage the building of new relationships that continue to be productive beyond the end of the event.

Brainhack projects

Rather than focusing on a specific problem or toolset, which is common in traditional hackathons, attendees are encouraged to generate their own project ideas around which they can self-assemble into teams. As a consequence, some projects may receive more limited interest, whereas one might attract the majority of attendees. In this way, the projects developed at Brainhacks are elected by participation, rather than being pre-specified by the event organizers. This model is more conducive to collaboration than the alternative of organizing a hackathon around a challenge or competition. There are many different models between these two extremes; we are currently working on building thematic Brainhack events that bring researchers together to focus on specific questions of neuroscientific interest. To date, projects completed at Brainhack events have included students interacting with more experienced researchers to learn about a new data modality or analysis method, inter-disciplinary collaborations to improve data collection, the development or optimization of data analysis tools, and testing hypotheses about brain structure using openly shared data. See Table 1 for selected examples of projects that have previously been initiated at Brainhack events, and https://www.brainhack.org [1] for a full list of projects.

Event organization

Brainhack events span 1 to 4 days and include a variety of content to make them both accessible and fruitful for a wide range of attendees. The format of the events is not fixed, but varies based on the needs determined by the local organizing committee. At past events, the schedule has included various components aiming to quickly integrate the attendees and generate an environment conducive to productive collaboration. We have found the activity categories included in Table 2 to be valuable elements of creating a productive environment.
Table 2

Programming components of Brainhack events

Meet and greet: Brainhack events begin with a welcome to the hosting facility by the local organizing committee, along with a briefing about the event schedule, procedures, or other information that might be important for the attendees.
Ice breaker: Interaction between attendees is the key to a successful Brainhack event. The ice breaker is an activity to introduce attendees and their interests to one another. One strategy that has been successful is for each attendee to give their name, their institution, and three words that describe their interests. Such ice breakers could take various forms, including a speed-dating paradigm in which attendees pair up for a brief conversation, after which attendees swap partners, and this continues until every pair has met.
Ignite talks: Brainhack’s equivalent of keynote sessions, Ignite talks are inspirational talks on the big picture of open brain science that are intended to invigorate the audience for the day ahead. These are ideally brief (a 10-minute presentation followed by 10 minutes of questions), of general relevance, and are provided by a luminary in the field.
Hacking: The core of Brainhack is ‘open hacking’ sessions during which attendees collaborate together on projects of their choosing. Attendees who have specific project ideas or data that they would like to explore are encouraged to advertise their project at https://www.brainhack.org [1] prior to the event. At the opening of the Brainhack event, typically after the ice breaker, attendees pitch their ideas and afterwards mingle with others to organize a project team. Teams work together throughout the remainder of Brainhack and are given the opportunity to present their progress during the wrap-up session at the end of the event.
Brainhacking 101: The educational track enables less experienced attendees to learn basic software and data analysis skills. Occurring in parallel so as not to interfere with the ongoing hacking sessions, this track begins with ‘Installfest’ sessions during which attendees receive help installing any required software. Afterwards there are several hands-on tutorials that cover topics like: using Github, Python programming, using Python to load and visualize neuroimaging data, and performing meta-analyses of scientific literature. The resources for educational sessions are made freely available online (e.g., [31]).
Unconference: Sessions for attendees to present their research or other topics of current interest. Immediately prior to these sessions, the agenda is determined on-site. Attendees who are willing to present add their name to a sign-up sheet and in the event that there are more interested presenters than time, the group is polled to determine which presentations are given time or to extend the amount of time allotted. Instead of unconference sessions, some sites have incorporated ‘data blitzes,’ consisting of a pre-organized session where attendees have the opportunity to present their research. Brainhack Miami has had success with this model and has secured funding to award monetary prizes to the best presentations.
Wrap-up and feedback: Brainhack events typically finish with a wrap-up session during which project teams describe the progress that they made or give a demo of their results in a brief (∼1–2-minute) presentation. Afterwards, the local organizers lead a discussion about what worked well with the event, and how it could be improved in the future.
Programming components of Brainhack events

Practical considerations

To enable broad attendance by researchers, regardless of their resources, fees are kept as low as possible and many of the events are free. This has been made possible through generous financial support and meeting space provided by hosting institutions and corporate sponsors. When possible, lunch and dinner have been provided to encourage continued interaction between attendees throughout the duration of the event. We have also aimed to reduce travel costs by co-locating events with other international workshops, such as the 2012 Biennial Conference on Resting State Brain Connectivity in Magdeburg, Germany, and annual meetings of the Organization of Human Brain Mapping (OHBM).

Partnership with OHBM

The first annual OHBM Hackathon took place in Seattle, Washington as an initiative of the meeting’s 2013 local organizing committee, and its format has evolved subsequently to complement and bring value to the mainstream meeting. The 2013 event followed a traditional model of competitive challenges to accelerate the adoption of cloud-based open neuroscience tools by the neuroimaging community, while introducing a novel, conference-long ‘Data Science Room’ for collaboration. In 2014, Brainhack’s collaborative ethos was integrated, eliciting a strong, positive response from participants, and the OHBM leadership has continued to be very supportive of the Brainhack model ever since. The annual OHBM Hackathon has evolved to include a 2-day intensive hackathon and an additional educational day that is open to all OHBM attendees, and continues to include the Data Science Room to host educational content and open collaboration throughout the meeting.

Regional events

Brainhack began as international events that drew attendees from all over the world to work together in open collaboration. Early interest in transferring this model to the local level was tempered by fears that local events would not be able to provide enough content to attract attendees. Brainhack Eastern Daylight Time (Brainhack EDT) was developed to address these concerns by organizing several simultaneous events that are virtually linked to enable the real-time sharing of content across sites. Events were limited to sites in time zones within 1 hour of EDT to simplify scheduling. This innovative distributed model drew 242 attendees across seven sites located in three different countries, and has since been followed by Brainhack Americas, which extended this model to the entirety of North, South, and Central America (see Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Brainhack events occurring 2012–2014

2012 Brainhack and Unconference 1–4 September 2012
Leipzig, Germany (72)
Host: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognition and Brain Sciences
Organizers: Daniel Margulies , Pierre Bellec, Cameron Craddock, Donald McLaren,
Maarten Mennes
OHBM Hackathon 2013 16–20 June 2013
Seattle, Washington, USA (136)
Host: Organization for Human Brain Mapping
Organizers: Nolan Nichols , Tom Grabowski , Chinh Dang, Elaine Shen,
Rachel Pizarro, Jamie Kinney, Satra Ghosh, and the OHBM 2013 Local Organizing Committee
Brainhack 2013 23–26 October 2013
Paris, France (70)
Host: Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre-et-
Marie-Curie, Paris 06, CNRS, INSERM
Organizers: Selma Mesmoudi , Yves Burnod , Donald McLaren, Cameron Craddock,
Pierre Bellec, Daniel Margulies, Maarten Mennes
OHBM Hackathon 2014 5–7 July 2014
Berlin, Germany (65)
Host: Organization for Human Brain Mapping
Organizers: Daniel Margulies , Pierre Bellec, Cameron Craddock, Tom Grabowski,
Sean Hill, Nolan Nichols, JB Poline, and the OHBM 2014 Local Organizing Committee
Brainhack Eastern Daylight Time 18–19 October 2014
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (15)
Host: University of Michigan
Organizers: Scott Peltier , Robert Welsh
Boston, Massachusetts, USA (35)
Host: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Organizers: Satra Ghosh , Matt Hutchison , Donald McLaren
Miami, Florida, USA (39)
Host: Florida International University
Organizers: Angie Laird , Lucina Uddin
Montréal, Québec, Canada (49)
Host: Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal
Organizers: Benjamin De Leener , Julien Cohen-Adad , Pierre Bellec
New York, New York, USA (37)
Host: Child Mind Institute and Columbia University
Organizers: Cameron Craddock , Andrew Gerber
Porto Alegre, Brazil (25)
Host: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Organizers: Alexandre Franco , Caroline Fröhlich , Felipe Meneguzzi
Toronto, Ontario, Canada (15)
Host: University of Toronto
Organizers: Jonathan Downar , Katie Dunlop , Stephen Strother
Washington DC, USA (27)
Host: Georgetown University
Organizers: John Van Meter , Lei Liew , Ziad Saad , Prantik Kundu

The number of attendees for each event are included in parentheses ⋆Local organizers for an event. Distributed event main organizer

Table 4

Brainhack events in 2015

OHBM Hackathon 2015 12–14 June 2015
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (59)
Host: Organization for Human Brain Mapping
Organizers: Nolan Nichols , Pierre Bellec, Cameron Craddock, Tom Grabowski,
Jack Van Horn, Daniel Margulies, JB Poline, and the OHBM 2015 Local Organizing Committee
Brainhack Montreal 2015 27–29 July 2015
Montréal, Québec, Canada (53)
Host: Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal
Organizers: Benjamin De Leener , Julien Cohen-Adad , Pierre Bellec
Sebastien Dery , Pierre-Olivier Quirion
Brainhack Americas 23–25 October 2015
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (10)
Host: University of Michigan
Organizers: Scott Peltier , Robert Welsh
Berkeley, California, USA (7)
Host: D-Lab, University of California, Berkeley
Organizers: Daniel Lurie , JB Poline
Los Angeles, California, USA (38)
Host: University of Southern California
Organizers: Lei Liew , Gautam Prasad , Yonggang Shi
Miami, Florida, USA (50)
Host: University of Miami
Organizers: Lucina Uddin , Angie Laird
New York, New York, USA (33)
Host: Translational & Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine
at Mount Sinai and Child Mind Institute
Organizers: Christopher Cannistraci , Prantik Kundu , David O’Connor,
Ting Xu, Cameron Craddock ,
Porto Alegre, Brazil (30)
Host: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Organizers: Alexandre Franco , Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld, Felipe Meneguzzi , Ramon Fraga Pereira
Querétaro, México (31)
Host: Instituto De Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Organizers: Sarael Alcauter , Fernando Barrios , Cameron Craddock ,
Eric H Pasaye
Seattle, Washington, USA (12)
Host: University of Washington eScience Institute
Organizers: Ariel Rokem

The number of attendees for each event are included in parentheses ⋆Local organizers for an event. Distributed event main organizer

Brainhack events occurring 2012–2014 The number of attendees for each event are included in parentheses ⋆Local organizers for an event. Distributed event main organizer Brainhack events in 2015 The number of attendees for each event are included in parentheses ⋆Local organizers for an event. Distributed event main organizer

Post-conference publications

While traditional conference publications are submitted in advance of the event, to complement the unique on-site organizational structure of Brainhack, a new publication paradigm is needed that accommodates its open format. In partnership with GigaScience [2] we have recently introduced project reports in the form of post-conference proceedings as a way to account for and promote the progress made at Brainhacks. Proceedings will be published annually, peer-reviewed by members of the Brainhack community, and are open to submissions from all the previous year’s Brainhack events. Further information can be found at https://www.brainhack.org/proceedings [3].

Brainhack thematic series

Additionally, GigaScience [2] is hosting a Brainhack Thematic Series as a venue for publishing full research articles that feature open tools for neuroscience. The series invites submissions that embody the ethos of open science. Example topics include open source software projects, data repositories, meta-analytic and collaborative resources, and other open science initiatives, regardless of whether they have roots at Brainhack events. More information can be found at https://www.brainhack.org/series [4].

Conclusions

Brainhack promotes open neuroscience by offering unique opportunities to researchers from a variety of backgrounds to build collaborations and develop new skills. It is particularly valuable to junior researchers and those from developing economies who have limited opportunities to interact with peers and senior scientists outside their home institutions. Despite these successes, Brainhack is a nascent concept for scientific meetings, and there remains substantial room for innovation. To this end, we are excited to announce the Brainhack Proceedings and Brainhack Thematic Series for providing researchers with tangible scientific credit for their contributions to Brainhack events and open science. For the future, we will be working to expand the global audience of Brainhack by hosting events throughout Asia.

Availability of supporting data

More information about Brainhack, including projects from past and future events, can be found at https://www.brainhack.org [1].
  11 in total

1.  Multicenter mapping of structural network alterations in autism.

Authors:  Sofie L Valk; Adriana Di Martino; Michael P Milham; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; Gang Song; Sandhitsu R Das; Jeffrey T Duda; Benjamin M Kandel; Niels van Strien; James R Stone; James C Gee; Brian B Avants
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  LinkRbrain: multi-scale data integrator of the brain.

Authors:  Salma Mesmoudi; Mathieu Rodic; Claudia Cioli; Jean-Philippe Cointet; Tal Yarkoni; Yves Burnod
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  B Fischl; A M Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Automatic "pipeline" analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alex P Zijdenbos; Reza Forghani; Alan C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for "Pipeline" Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI.

Authors:  Yan Chao-Gan; Zang Yu-Feng
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-14

7.  Optimizing full-brain coverage in human brain MRI through population distributions of brain size.

Authors:  Maarten Mennes; Mark Jenkinson; Romain Valabregue; Jan K Buitelaar; Christian Beckmann; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tamara Vanderwal; Clare Kelly; Jeffrey Eilbott; Linda C Mayes; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The pipeline system for Octave and Matlab (PSOM): a lightweight scripting framework and execution engine for scientific workflows.

Authors:  Pierre Bellec; Sébastien Lavoie-Courchesne; Phil Dickinson; Jason P Lerch; Alex P Zijdenbos; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism.

Authors:  A Di Martino; C-G Yan; Q Li; E Denio; F X Castellanos; K Alaerts; J S Anderson; M Assaf; S Y Bookheimer; M Dapretto; B Deen; S Delmonte; I Dinstein; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Fair; L Gallagher; D P Kennedy; C L Keown; C Keysers; J E Lainhart; C Lord; B Luna; V Menon; N J Minshew; C S Monk; S Mueller; R-A Müller; M B Nebel; J T Nigg; K O'Hearn; K A Pelphrey; S J Peltier; J D Rudie; S Sunaert; M Thioux; J M Tyszka; L Q Uddin; J S Verhoeven; N Wenderoth; J L Wiggins; S H Mostofsky; M P Milham
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  10 in total

1.  Head motion: the dirty little secret of neuroimaging in psychiatry

Authors:  Carolina Makowski; Martin Lepage; Alan C. Evans
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Ningfei Li; Till A Dembek; Ari Kappel; Chadwick Boulay; Siobhan Ewert; Anna Tietze; Andreas Husch; Thushara Perera; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Marco Reisert; Hang Si; Robert Oostenveld; Christopher Rorden; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Qianqian Fang; Todd M Herrington; Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Kühn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brainhack: Developing a culture of open, inclusive, community-driven neuroscience.

Authors:  Rémi Gau; Stephanie Noble; Katja Heuer; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Isil P Bilgin; Yu-Fang Yang; Julia M Huntenburg; Johanna M M Bayer; Richard A I Bethlehem; Shawn A Rhoads; Christoph Vogelbacher; Valentina Borghesani; Elizabeth Levitis; Hao-Ting Wang; Sofie Van Den Bossche; Xenia Kobeleva; Jon Haitz Legarreta; Samuel Guay; Selim Melvin Atay; Gael P Varoquaux; Dorien C Huijser; Malin S Sandström; Peer Herholz; Samuel A Nastase; AmanPreet Badhwar; Guillaume Dumas; Simon Schwab; Stefano Moia; Michael Dayan; Yasmine Bassil; Paula P Brooks; Matteo Mancini; James M Shine; David O'Connor; Xihe Xie; Davide Poggiali; Patrick Friedrich; Anibal S Heinsfeld; Lydia Riedl; Roberto Toro; César Caballero-Gaudes; Anders Eklund; Kelly G Garner; Christopher R Nolan; Damion V Demeter; Fernando A Barrios; Junaid S Merchant; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Robert Oostenveld; R Cameron Craddock; Ariel Rokem; Andrew Doyle; Satrajit S Ghosh; Aki Nikolaidis; Olivia W Stanley; Eneko Uruñuela
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 18.688

4.  Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences.

Authors:  John Darrell Van Horn
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.426

5.  Healthcare Hackathons Provide Educational and Innovation Opportunities: A Case Study and Best Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; David S Binder; Nevena Zubcevik; Ross D Zafonte
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Cyberinfrastructure for Open Science at the Montreal Neurological Institute.

Authors:  Samir Das; Tristan Glatard; Christine Rogers; John Saigle; Santiago Paiva; Leigh MacIntyre; Mouna Safi-Harab; Marc-Etienne Rousseau; Jordan Stirling; Najmeh Khalili-Mahani; David MacFarlane; Penelope Kostopoulos; Pierre Rioux; Cecile Madjar; Xavier Lecours-Boucher; Sandeep Vanamala; Reza Adalat; Zia Mohaddes; Vladimir S Fonov; Sylvain Milot; Ilana Leppert; Clotilde Degroot; Thomas M Durcan; Tara Campbell; Jeremy Moreau; Alain Dagher; D Louis Collins; Jason Karamchandani; Amit Bar-Or; Edward A Fon; Rick Hoge; Sylvain Baillet; Guy Rouleau; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Hack weeks as a model for data science education and collaboration.

Authors:  Daniela Huppenkothen; Anthony Arendt; David W Hogg; Karthik Ram; Jacob T VanderPlas; Ariel Rokem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  BioHackathon 2015: Semantics of data for life sciences and reproducible research.

Authors:  Rutger A Vos; Toshiaki Katayama; Hiroyuki Mishima; Shin Kawano; Shuichi Kawashima; Jin-Dong Kim; Yuki Moriya; Toshiaki Tokimatsu; Atsuko Yamaguchi; Yasunori Yamamoto; Hongyan Wu; Peter Amstutz; Erick Antezana; Nobuyuki P Aoki; Kazuharu Arakawa; Jerven T Bolleman; Evan Bolton; Raoul J P Bonnal; Hidemasa Bono; Kees Burger; Hirokazu Chiba; Kevin B Cohen; Eric W Deutsch; Jesualdo T Fernández-Breis; Gang Fu; Takatomo Fujisawa; Atsushi Fukushima; Alexander García; Naohisa Goto; Tudor Groza; Colin Hercus; Robert Hoehndorf; Kotone Itaya; Nick Juty; Takeshi Kawashima; Jee-Hyub Kim; Akira R Kinjo; Masaaki Kotera; Kouji Kozaki; Sadahiro Kumagai; Tatsuya Kushida; Thomas Lütteke; Masaaki Matsubara; Joe Miyamoto; Attayeb Mohsen; Hiroshi Mori; Yuki Naito; Takeru Nakazato; Jeremy Nguyen-Xuan; Kozo Nishida; Naoki Nishida; Hiroyo Nishide; Soichi Ogishima; Tazro Ohta; Shujiro Okuda; Benedict Paten; Jean-Luc Perret; Philip Prathipati; Pjotr Prins; Núria Queralt-Rosinach; Daisuke Shinmachi; Shinya Suzuki; Tsuyosi Tabata; Terue Takatsuki; Kieron Taylor; Mark Thompson; Ikuo Uchiyama; Bruno Vieira; Chih-Hsuan Wei; Mark Wilkinson; Issaku Yamada; Ryota Yamanaka; Kazutoshi Yoshitake; Akiyasu C Yoshizawa; Michel Dumontier; Kenjiro Kosaki; Toshihisa Takagi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-24

9.  One-off events? An empirical study of hackathon code creation and reuse.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Imam Mahmoud; Tapajit Dey; Alexander Nolte; Audris Mockus; James D Herbsleb
Journal:  Empir Softw Eng       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.762

10.  A collaborative resource platform for non-human primate neuroimaging.

Authors:  Adam Messinger; Nikoloz Sirmpilatze; Katja Heuer; Kep Kee Loh; Rogier B Mars; Julien Sein; Ting Xu; Daniel Glen; Benjamin Jung; Jakob Seidlitz; Paul Taylor; Roberto Toro; Eduardo A Garza-Villarreal; Caleb Sponheim; Xindi Wang; R Austin Benn; Bastien Cagna; Rakshit Dadarwal; Henry C Evrard; Pamela Garcia-Saldivar; Steven Giavasis; Renée Hartig; Claude Lepage; Cirong Liu; Piotr Majka; Hugo Merchant; Michael P Milham; Marcello G P Rosa; Jordy Tasserie; Lynn Uhrig; Daniel S Margulies; P Christiaan Klink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 7.400

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.