Literature DB >> 27042101

Prognostic value of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Guang-Jun Li1, Hong-Wei Xu1, Juan-Juan Ji2, Fang Yang2, Bao-Qin Gao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammation and immunity have an important role in the development of cancer. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has been shown to be of prognostic value in several malignant forms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of preoperative LMR in post-curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: A total of 144 patients with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent curative operation were enrolled in this retrospective study. The correlation between preoperative LMR and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, an elevated preoperative LMR was significantly associated with an increased overall survival (OS) (19 months vs 12 months, P=0.000), and this result remained significant in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.148; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.085-0.252; P=0.000). Furthermore, patients with high LMR also had higher median recurrence-free survival (RFS) than patients with low LMR in univariate (18 months vs 10 months, P=0.000) and multivariate analyses (HR: 0.148; 95% CI: 0.085-0.252; P=0.000). Subgroup analyses showed that both patients with stage III cancer and patients with stage I+II cancer can obtain OS and RFS benefits from high LMR.
CONCLUSION: LMR can be considered as an independent prognostic biomarker for operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; survival

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042101      PMCID: PMC4780182          DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S96707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onco Targets Ther        ISSN: 1178-6930            Impact factor:   4.147


Introduction

In People’s Republic of China, the morbidity and mortality of pancreatic adenocarcinoma show an increasing trend due to changes in dietary composition and habits, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been ranked as the seventh most common cancer and the ninth leading cause of cancer-related deaths.1 Although currently there are several conventional and emerging treatment options available for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, surgery remains the main treatment approach, but is possible for only 20% of localized diseases.2 Moreover, patients who underwent curative resection continue to suffer from high rates of perioperative morbidity.3,4 Classification of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients can help to predict survival and thus aid in providing individualized therapies that can improve clinical outcomes; therefore, the importance of prognostic and predictive biomarkers has been increasingly recognized.5 However, biomarkers actually utilized in clinical practice are currently limited to clinicopathological characteristics such as the histological stage, pathological type, resection margins, or tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) stage, which can be evaluated only through postoperative histological studies and findings during surgery.6–8 Therefore, new biomarkers that are inexpensive and technically feasible are required. It has been confirmed that inflammation plays an important role in the development and therapeutic response of many malignant tumors.9 Inflammatory-related cells can produce proangiogenic factors and inflammatory mediators, and thus generate a favorable cancer-related inflammatory microenvironment that promotes vascular invasion and suppression of the host immune system.10–12 Alternatively, tumors can secrete several cytokines that influence the blood cells associated with inflammation and immunity, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and blood platelets.13,14 Several inflammatory response related biomarkers have potential prognostic significance in patients with various types of malignancies, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR).15–17 Fujiwara et al analyzed 111 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic carcinoma and reported that the prognosis and overall survival of patients with low postoperative peripheral LMR was significantly poorer than those of patients with high postoperative peripheral LMR.18 However, there are still no reports concerning the association between preoperative LMR and survival in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic significance of preoperative LMR in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative surgery.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of 144 patients with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma and who had undergone curative resection at the First Department of General Surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-Xiang Medical University between June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2014 were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma, >18 years of age, and life expectancy >6 months. The exclusion criteria were acute and severe preoperative medical conditions and adjuvant treatments, such as systemic infection, autoimmune diseases or inflammation, and chemotherapy. Medical information of all patients was collected from the clinical records by one surgeon and checked by another surgeon, including sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, CA19-9, tumor site, tumor size, T stage, lymph node status, TNM, and pathological differentiation. Histopathological and clinic staging were evaluated through postoperative histopathological examination and clinical assessment by the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification, respectively. Routine blood test was carried out on the day before surgery to obtain absolute lymphocyte and monocyte counts. LMR was calculated by using the equation: LMR = absolute lymphocyte count/absolute monocyte ratio.

Follow-up

All patients were followed up in regular style through outpatient visit, including physical and laboratory examinations – CA19-9 was evaluated every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and once annually thereafter. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were generally obtained for every 12 months. Clinical follow-up lasted from the date of surgery to either the time of death or June 2015. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xin-Xiang Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). P<0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant. The optimal cutoff values for the LMR were determined through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. OS was accurately defined as the duration from date of surgery to death, while recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated as the time from diagnosis to tumor recurrence. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the association between qualitative variables and LMR, while quantitative values were analyzed by independent Student’s t-test. The OS, RFS, and survival curve were studied in Kaplan–Meier analyses by using the log-rank test. The Cox regression model was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and multivariate analysis.

Results

Baseline clinicopathological characteristics are shown in Table 1. A total of 144 patients with primary localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in our study, and among them 77 were males and 67 females, with an average age of 62±2.8 years. Eighty-nine patients were diagnosed with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, while tumors in 55 patients were located at pancreatic body or tail. According to the TNM staging methods, 45 patients were diagnosed with stage I or II tumor and 99 with stage III tumor. Based on pathological analysis, we found that 76 patients suffered from well/moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, whereas 68 patients presented with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Moreover, there was no statistically significant association between LMR and clinicopathological characteristics except the TNM stage.
Table 1

Correlation between the percentage of LMR and clinicopathological characteristics

CharacteristicsLMR
P-value
≥2.8 (n=68)<2.8 (n=76)
Age (years)0.504
 ≥603636
 <603240
Sex0.593
 Male3646
 Female3230
ASA score0.244
 1+25163
 31713
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.175
 ≥2004255
 <2002621
WBC count (/L)0.573
 ≥5×1093846
 <5×1093030
Lymphocyte count (/L)0.000
 ≥1.3×1095712
 <1.3×1091164
Monocyte count (/L)0.000
 ≥0.4×1092262
 <0.4×1094614
Tumor site0.983
 Head5056
 Body/tail1820
Tumor size (cm)0.247
 ≥3.01422
 <35454
Tumor invasion depth0.881
 T1+T21113
 T3+T45763
Lymph node involvement0.193
 N03244
 N13632
TNM stage0.041
 I+II4234
 III2642
Pathological differentiation0.860
 Well/moderate3338
 Poor3538

Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; WBC, white blood cells; LMR, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; TNM, tumor–node–metastasis.

Prognostic significance of LMR for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The median LMR from all enrolled patients was 2.8 (range: 1.2–4.7). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff levels for the LMR were 2.86 for OS and 2.58 for RFS. The area under the curve was 0.632 for OS and 0.569 for RFS (Figure 1). The median follow-up time was 14 months (range 6–40 months). There were significant associations between T stage, lymph node involvement, TNM stage, and LMR with OS and RFS (Tables 2 and 3).
Figure 1

(A) ROC curve for OS, the area under the curve was 0.632 for LMR. (B) ROC curve for RFS, the area under the curve was 0.569 for LMR.

Abbreviations: ROC, receiver-operator characteristic; OS, overall survival; LMR, leukocyte to monocyte ratio; RFS, recurrence-free survival.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association of the prognostic characteristics with OS

Univariate
Multivariate
Patients (n)MS (months)P-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age (years)0.083
 ≥607214
 <607217
Sex0.534
 Male8214
 Female6216
ASA score0.032
 1+211418
 33012
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.874
 ≥2009714
 <2004716
WBC count (/L)0.448
 ≥5×1098413
 <5×1096017
Lymphocyte count (/L)0.022
 ≥1.3×1096919
 <1.3×1097513
Monocyte count (/L)0.081
 ≥0.4×1098412
 <0.4×1096018
Tumor location0.182
 Head10616
 Body/tail3814
Tumor size (cm)0.204
 ≥3.03614
 <310819
T stage0.005
 T1+T22422
 T3+T412014
Lymph node status0.001
 N07618
 N16813
TNM stage0.0005.6313.148–9.1820.000
 I+II7618
 III6813
Pathological differentiation0.0050.5660.402–0.9320.021
 Well/moderate7117
 Poor7313
LMR0.0000.1480.085–0.2520.000
 ≥2.863419
 <2.863812

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; MS, median survival; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; WBC, white blood cells; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LMR, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; TNM, tumor–node–metastasis.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association of the prognostic characteristics with RFS

Univariate
Multivariate
Patients (n)MS (months)P-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age (years)0.093
 ≥607212
 <607215
Sex0.426
 Male8213
 Female6214
ASA score0.0232.2971.286–4.1030.005
 1+211412
 33015
CA19-9 (U/mL)0.584
 ≥2009713
 <2004715
WBC count (/L)0.662
 ≥5×1098415
 <5×1096012
Lymphocyte count (/L)0.021
 ≥1.3×1096916
 <1.3×1097512
Monocyte count (/L)0.042
 ≥0.4×1098412
 <0.4×1096015
Tumor location0.273
 Head10614
 Body/tail3813
Tumor size (cm)0.204
 ≥3.03613
 <310815
T stage0.014
 T1+T22414
 T3+T412013
Lymph node status0.004
 N07616
 N16812
TNM stage0.0013.8961.168–9.2830.050
 I+II7616
 III6812
Pathological differentiation0.0080.5990.393–0.9120.017
 Well/moderate7115
 Poor7312
LMR0.0000.1520.092–0.2500.000
 ≥2.583418
 <2.583810

Abbreviations: RFS, recurrence-free survival; MS, median survival; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; WBC, white blood cells; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LMR, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio; TNM, tumor–node–metastasis.

At the end of this study, among 144 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 114 (79.2%) developed tumor recurrence and 110 (76.4%) died within the follow-up period. The tumor recurred in 70 (93.3%) out of 75 patients with an LMR <2.58 and in 44 (63.8%) out of 69 patients with an LMR ≥2.58. Death occurred in 68 (87.2%) out of 78 patients with an LMR <2.86 and in 42 (63.6%) out of 66 patients with an LMR ≥2.86. In univariate analyses, patients with an LMR ≥2.86 in peripheral blood had a statistically significantly better postoperative prognosis than those with an LMR <2.86 in median OS (19 months vs 12 months, P=0.000) (Table 2, Figure 2). Furthermore, this result remained significant in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.148; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.085–0.252; P=0.000) (Table 2). When compared to the patients with low LMR (<2.58), patients with high LMR (≥2.58) also had higher median RFS in univariate (18 months vs 10 months, P=0.000) and multivariate analyses (HR: 0.152; 95% CI: 0.092–0.250; P=0.000) (Table 3, Figure 3).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival.

Notes: (A) Shows the association between LMR and OS (median survival in LMR ≥2.86, 19 months; in LMR <2.86, 12 months, P=0.000). (B) Shows the association between LMR and RFS (median survival in LMR ≥2.58, 18 months; in LMR <2.58, 10 months, P=0.000).

Abbreviations: LMR, leukocyte to monocyte ratio; OS, overall survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival.

Figure 3

TNM stage wise survivability.

Notes: (A and B) Show that there is statistically significant correlation between LMR and OS and RFS of patients with early stage cancer. (C and D) Show that there is significant association between LMR and OS and RFS of patients with advanced cancer.

Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; LMR, leukocyte to monocyte ratio; OS, overall survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival.

For locally resected advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (TNM stage III), patients with high LMR had a median OS of 18 months, whereas patients with low LMR had a median OS of 7 months (P=0.000). Alternatively, high LMR was also predictive of higher median RFS in patients with stage III cancer (16 months vs 7 months, P=0.000). When compared with low LMR, high LMR was significantly associated with higher OS (24 months vs 15 months, P=0.010) as well as higher RFS (20 months vs 13 months, P=0.003) in patients with stage I and II cancer (Figure 3). A multivariate analysis enrolled the sex of patients, ASA score, CA19-9, tumor size, histological differentiation type, TNM stage, and LMR into the COX regression model to identify independent prognostic factors for operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma since TNM stage is obtained from combining tumor invasion depth and lymph node involvements and LMR (calculated from lymphocyte and monocyte counts). The result showed that LMR (HR: 0.148; 95% CI: 0.085–0.252; P<0.05), TNM (HR: 5.631; 95% CI: 3.148–9.182; P<0.05), and pathological differentiation (HR: 0.566; 95% CI: 0.402–0.932; P<0.05) were the independent prognostic factors for OS of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Table 2). Otherwise, ASA score (HR: 2.297; 95% CI: 1.286–4.103; P<0.05), LMR (HR: 0.152; 95% CI: 0.092–0.250; P<0.05), TNM (HR: 3.896; 95% CI: 1.168–9.283; P<0.05), and pathological differentiation (HR: 0.599; 95% CI: 0.393–0.912; P<0.05) were the independent prognostic factors for RFS of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Table 3).

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed a large cohort of patients who underwent curative resection for primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma and found a significant association of LMR with OS and RFS in univariate analysis. Furthermore, in the subgroup analyses, the association was also applied to both patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and patients with early cancer. LMR is independent prognostic factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Therefore, our study confirmed that preoperative LMR can be used to enable optimal risk stratification for individual patients prior to treatment and to predict post-curative resection prognosis for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Inflammation plays an important role in cancer progression and metastasis, which are also influenced by host immunity.19 Lymphocytes are the main components of the immune system and cellular basis of immunosurveillance and immunoediting, reflecting immune response against the tumor.20 Lymphocytopenia is also a significant characteristic in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer when vascular invasion, lymph node, or distant metastases are present, which has been found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS in pancreatic cancers.21–23 Tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, including neutrophils and monocytes, also have a crucial role in the development and progression of a tumor.24 The monocytes in peripheral blood include the dendritic cells and macrophages.25 Dendritic cells with regulatory function cause immunosuppression through activated Treg cells in patients with malignant tumor while macrophages kill tumor cells.26,27 Several studies showed that increased preoperative peripheral blood monocyte count negatively correlated with survival in patients with malignancy.28,29 LMR, as an inflammation and immunity-related biomarker based on lymphocytes and monocytes, has been found to be a significant prognostic marker for several malignancies.30–32 Stotz et al analyzed 372 patients with stage II and III colon cancer and found that the LMR might be an independent prognostic marker for TTR (time to recurrence) in stage III patients.31 Chen et al evaluated the prognostic values of LMR in 485 patients with stage Ib1–IIa cervical cancer and found that decreased pretreatment LMR is associated with a poor prognosis in stage Ib1–IIa patients who undergo a radical operation.33 In the present study, we analyzed 144 patients who underwent curative operation for primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and found that LMR was not only an independent prognostic factor of primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma but also significantly related to TNM stage, which coincides with previous studies. There were several limitations to this study that could have possibly influenced the results. One problem was retrospective design of the study and limited number of patients involved. A large-scale multicenter prospective study would be preferred to confirm our results and to exclude selection bias. Furthermore, the cutoff levels of LMR value used in our study may not be suitable for other studies. A meta-analysis including various LMR validation studies may be required to confirm the cutoff value for LMR. In conclusion, LMR, as an easily and generally available, low price biomarker, could be considered as an independent prognostic factor for operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Immunity, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Florian R Greten; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Edward E Whang; Daniel T Ruan; Hiromichi Ito
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Molecular pathways in cancer-related inflammation.

Authors:  Annalisa Del Prete; Paola Allavena; Giuseppe Santoro; Ruggiero Fumarulo; Massimiliano M Corsi; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 4.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Prognostic value of preoperative peripheral blood monocyte count in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Atsushi Sasaki; Yukio Iwashita; Kohei Shibata; Toshifuni Matsumoto; Masayuki Ohta; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Cancer statistics: updated cancer burden in China.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  Cancer-related inflammation.

Authors:  Juliana Candido; Thorsten Hagemann
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 8.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Tiziana Meschi; Antonio Nouvenne; Camilla Mattiuzzi; Loris Borghi
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.394

Review 9.  Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness.

Authors:  Connie I Diakos; Kellie A Charles; Donald C McMillan; Stephen J Clarke
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Decreased pretreatment lymphocyte/monocyte ratio is associated with poor prognosis in stage Ib1-IIa cervical cancer patients who undergo radical surgery.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Fang Zhang; Xiu-Gui Sheng; Shi-Qian Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  22 in total

1.  The Prognostic Impact of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Resected Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onoe; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Yasuyuki Fukami; Takamasa Takahashi; Masahito Uji; Yuji Kaneoka
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Markers of Systemic Inflammatory Response are Prognostic Factors in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs): A Prospective Analysis.

Authors:  Apostolos Gaitanidis; Dhaval Patel; Naris Nilubol; Amit Tirosh; Samira Sadowski; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is the most predictive inflammatory response marker of survival in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keisuke Okuno; Masanori Tokunaga; Yamato Yamashita; Yuya Umebayashi; Toshifumi Saito; Ryosuke Fukuyo; Yuya Sato; Katsumasa Saito; Naoto Fujiwara; Akihiro Hoshino; Kenro Kawada; Takatoshi Matsuyama; Yusuke Kinugasa
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Does lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio before, during, or after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer predict for clinical outcomes?

Authors:  Irene Giacomelli; Daniele Scartoni; Homan Mohammadi; William F Regine; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

5.  Peripheral blood monocyte counts are elevated in the pre-diagnostic phase of pancreatic cancer: A population based study.

Authors:  Jaime de la Fuente; Ayush Sharma; Suresh Chari; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Preoperative Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Long-Term Outcome for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Koji Kubota; Akira Shimizu; Tsuyoshi Notake; Hitoshi Masuo; Kiyotaka Hosoda; Koya Yasukawa; Hikaru Hayashi; Kentaro Umemura; Atsushi Kamachi; Takamune Goto; Hidenori Tomida; Shiori Yamazaki; Yuji Soejima
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Resected Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Le-Ping Fang; Xiao-Yan Xu; Yu Ji; Pu-Wen Huang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Preoperative systemic inflammatory markers are prognostic indicators in recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Apostolos Gaitanidis; Douglas Wiseman; Mustapha El Lakis; Naris Nilubol; Electron Kebebew; Dhaval Patel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 9.  Pretreatment Lymphocyte Monocyte Ratio Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Digestive System Tumor: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jingwen Zhang; Lishan Chen; Rui Zhou; Huiying Sun; Yulin Liao; Wangjun Liao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio can predict mortality in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gurshawn Singh; Ammar Nassri; David Kim; Hong Zhu; Zeeshan Ramzan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.