Literature DB >> 27041408

Qualitative Development and Content Validity of the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), A Patient-reported Outcome Instrument.

Kelly P McCarrier1, Thomas M Atkinson2, Kendra P A DeBusk3, Astra M Liepa4, Michael Scanlon5, Stephen Joel Coons6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to describe the process and results of the preliminary qualitative development of a new symptoms-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure intended for assessing treatment benefit in clinical trials of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted in adults with NSCLC (Stages I-IV) in the United States. Experienced interviewers conducted concept-elicitation (CE) and cognitive interviews using semistructured interview guides. The CE interview guide was used for eliciting spontaneous reports of symptom experiences along with probing to further explore and confirm concepts. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed by professional qualitative coders, and were summarized by like content using an iterative coding framework. Data from the CE interviews were considered alongside existing literature and clinical expert opinion during an item-generation process, leading to the development of a preliminary version of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Three waves of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate concept relevance, item interpretability, and structure of the draft items and to facilitate further instrument refinement.
FINDINGS: Fifty-one subjects (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [11.2] years; 51.0% women) participated in the CE interviews. A total of 1897 expressions of NSCLC-related symptoms were identified and coded in interview transcripts, representing ~42 distinct symptom concepts. A 9-item initial-draft instrument was developed for testing in 3 waves of cognitive interviews with additional subjects with NSCLC (n = 20), during which both paper and electronic versions of the instrument were evaluated and refined. Participant responses and feedback during cognitive interviews led to the removal of 2 items and substantial modifications to others. IMPLICATIONS: The NSCLC-SAQ is a 7-item PRO measure intended for use in advanced NSCLC clinical trials to support medical product labelling. The NSCLC-SAQ uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. It was developed in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration's PRO Guidance and scientific best practices, and the resulting qualitative interview data provide evidence of content validity. The NSCLC-SAQ has been prepared in both paper and electronic administration formats and a tablet computer-based version is currently undergoing quantitative testing to confirm its measurement properties and support US Food and Drug Administration qualification.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSCLC; content validity; patient-reported outcome (PRO); qualitative research; scale development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27041408      PMCID: PMC4851890          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  19 in total

1.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Laurie B Burke; Chad J Gwaltney; Nancy Kline Leidy; Mona L Martin; Elizabeth Molsen; Lena Ring
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Laurie B Burke; Chad J Gwaltney; Nancy Kline Leidy; Mona L Martin; Elizabeth Molsen; Lena Ring
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Measuring the symptom burden of lung cancer: the validity and utility of the lung cancer module of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  Tito R Mendoza; Xin Shelley Wang; Charles Lu; Guadalupe R Palos; Zhongxing Liao; Gary M Mobley; Shitij Kapoor; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-01

4.  Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Laura E Tesler; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-hour recall of symptoms of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Donald L Patrick; James F Lymp; Todd C Edwards; Christopher H Goss
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting.

Authors:  Ethan Basch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The patient-reported outcome (PRO) consortium: filling measurement gaps for PRO end points to support labeling claims.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Kothari; B U Monz; L B Burke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Ping Yang; Stephen D Cassivi; Steven E Schild; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument.

Authors:  D F Cella; A E Bonomi; S R Lloyd; D S Tulsky; E Kaplan; P Bonomi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prospective development of a patient-reported outcomes instrument for desmoid tumors or aggressive fibromatosis.

Authors:  Mrinal M Gounder; LeAnne Maddux; Jean Paty; Thomas M Atkinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The Cystic Fibrosis Impact Questionnaire: qualitative development and cognitive evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the life impacts of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Kelly P McCarrier; Mariam Hassan; Paul Hodgkins; Ellison Suthoff; Lisa J McGarry; Mona L Martin
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 3.  Feasibility and Utility of Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Surveillance Strategies for Advanced Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Cavanna; Chiara Citterio; Elena Orlandi
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2020-02-13

4.  Symptoms and impacts in anemia of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Susan D Mathias; Steven I Blum; Vanja Sikirica; Kirsten L Johansen; Hilary H Colwell; Tony Okoro
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2020-07-29

5.  Evaluating the Content Validity, Clarity, and Relevance of Two Patient-Reported Outcomes for Use With Adults With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC.

Authors:  Marcia K Horn; Kevin Liu; Susan D Mathias; Hilary H Colwell; Tracy Li; Parthiv Mahadevia; Renee F Pierson
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2021-06-10

6.  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire: Psychometric Performance and Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measure.

Authors:  Donald M Bushnell; Thomas M Atkinson; Kelly P McCarrier; Astra M Liepa; Kendra P DeBusk; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2021-08-26

7.  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): Measurement Properties and Estimated Clinically Meaningful Thresholds From a Phase 3 Study.

Authors:  Paul Williams; Thomas Burke; Josephine M Norquist; Christina Daskalopoulou; Rebecca M Speck; Ayman Samkari; Sonya Eremenco; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.