Literature DB >> 27040426

Transcranial direct current stimulation is not effective in the motor strength and gait recovery following motor incomplete spinal cord injury during Lokomat(®) gait training.

Hatice Kumru1, Narda Murillo2, Jesus Benito-Penalva2, Jose M Tormos2, Joan Vidal2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential tool to improve motor recovery in patients with neurological disorders. Safety and efficacy of this procedure for lower extremity motor strengthe and gait function in motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) have not yet been addressed. The aim of this study is to optimize the functional outcome in early phases of gait rehabilitation assisted by Lokomat(®) in motor incomplete SCI patients using tDCS as an additional treatment to physical therapy.
METHODS: We performed in a SCI unit a single-centre randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to investigate safety and efficacy of anodal tDCS of over leg motor cortex in motor incomplete SCI patients. Twenty-four SCI patients received either daily sessions of anodal tDCS (n=12) at 2mA for 20min to the vertex (leg motor cortex) during twenty days or sham tDCS (n=12). Motor deficit was assessed by the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and for gait function: ten meter walking test (10MWT) and Walking Index for SCI (WISCI II) at baseline, after last tDCS session (after 4 weeks of stimulation), and after 8 weeks (from baseline) for follow-up.
RESULTS: No side effects were detected during either tDCS or sham. In both groups, there was a significant improvement in LEMS (p<0.03), which did not significantly differ when comparing anodal and sham tDCS groups. During follow-up, in both group 5 of 12 patients could perform gait, without significant differences in gait velocity, cadence, step length and WISCI-II between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Combination twenty sessions of daily tDCS to the leg motor cortex and Lokomat(®) gait training appear to be safe in motor incomplete SCI patients. There was an expected improvement in both LEMS and gait scales however, did not differ between patients treated with anodal or sham tDCS.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait rehabilitation; Lokomat; Lower extremity motor score; Spinal cord injury; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27040426     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  17 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marwa Mekki; Andrew D Delgado; Adam Fry; David Putrino; Vincent Huang
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: Implications on neurotherapy after brain injury.

Authors:  Ali Alawieh; Jing Zhao; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic training in incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcel Simis; Felipe Fregni; Linamara R Battistella
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-09-27

4.  Walking and Balance Outcomes Are Improved Following Brief Intensive Locomotor Skill Training but Are Not Augmented by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Persons With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nicholas H Evans; Cazmon Suri; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 5.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and rehabilitation to promote functional restoration in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer A Iddings; Anastasia Zarkou; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.283

Review 6.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Non-concomitant cortical structural and functional alterations in sensorimotor areas following incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yu Pan; Wei-Bei Dou; Yue-Heng Wang; Hui-Wen Luo; Yun-Xiang Ge; Shu-Yu Yan; Quan Xu; Yuan-Yuan Tu; Yan-Qing Xiao; Qiong Wu; Zhuo-Zhao Zheng; Hong-Liang Zhao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 8.  Non-invasive brain stimulation to promote motor and functional recovery following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aysegul Gunduz; John Rothwell; Joan Vidal; Hatice Kumru
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Effects of tDCS on Real-Time BCI Detection of Pedaling Motor Imagery.

Authors:  Maria de la Soledad Rodriguez-Ugarte; Eduardo Iáñez; Mario Ortiz-Garcia; José M Azorín
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Force control of wire driving lower limb rehabilitation robot.

Authors:  Yupeng Zou; Huizi Ma; Zhiyuan Han; Yang Song; Kai Liu
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.