Hazel M Parker1, Karen Mattick2. 1. Pharmacy Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. 2. Centre for Research in Professional Learning, Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Abstract
AIM: Little is known about the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing behaviour (APB), how they vary between hospital prescribers or the mechanism by which interventions are effective. Yet, interventions based on a sound theoretical understanding of APB are more likely to be successful in changing outcomes. This study sought to quantify the potential determinants of APB among hospital doctors in south-west England. METHODS: This multicentre, quantitative study employed a closed answer questionnaire to garner hospital doctors' views on factors influencing their APB. Underlying constructs within the data were identified using exploratory factor analysis and subsequent pairwise comparisons assessed for variance between groups of prescribers. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 301 doctors across four centres (response rate ≥ 74%) and three key factors were identified: autonomy, guidelines adherence and antibiotic awareness. The internal consistency for the questionnaire scale and for each factor subscale was good (α ≥ 0.7). Subgroup analysis identified significant differences between groups of prescribers: autonomy scores increased with grade until at the specialist trainee level (P ≤ 0.009), foundation doctors scored higher for guidelines adherence than consultants (P = 0.004) and specialist trainees (P = 0.003) and United Kingdom trained doctors scored higher than those trained abroad for antibiotic awareness (P < 0.0005). Scores did not vary significantly between doctors from different centres. CONCLUSION: Autonomy, guidelines adherence and antibiotic awareness were identified as important factors relevant to APB, which vary with experience and training. A theoretical framework is offered to facilitate development of more effective, tailored interventions to change APBs.
AIM: Little is known about the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing behaviour (APB), how they vary between hospital prescribers or the mechanism by which interventions are effective. Yet, interventions based on a sound theoretical understanding of APB are more likely to be successful in changing outcomes. This study sought to quantify the potential determinants of APB among hospital doctors in south-west England. METHODS: This multicentre, quantitative study employed a closed answer questionnaire to garner hospital doctors' views on factors influencing their APB. Underlying constructs within the data were identified using exploratory factor analysis and subsequent pairwise comparisons assessed for variance between groups of prescribers. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 301 doctors across four centres (response rate ≥ 74%) and three key factors were identified: autonomy, guidelines adherence and antibiotic awareness. The internal consistency for the questionnaire scale and for each factor subscale was good (α ≥ 0.7). Subgroup analysis identified significant differences between groups of prescribers: autonomy scores increased with grade until at the specialist trainee level (P ≤ 0.009), foundation doctors scored higher for guidelines adherence than consultants (P = 0.004) and specialist trainees (P = 0.003) and United Kingdom trained doctors scored higher than those trained abroad for antibiotic awareness (P < 0.0005). Scores did not vary significantly between doctors from different centres. CONCLUSION: Autonomy, guidelines adherence and antibiotic awareness were identified as important factors relevant to APB, which vary with experience and training. A theoretical framework is offered to facilitate development of more effective, tailored interventions to change APBs.
Authors: Valerie De Souza; Anne MacFarlane; Andrew W Murphy; Belinda Hanahoe; Andrew Barber; Martin Cormican Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Brad Spellberg; Martin Blaser; Robert J Guidos; Helen W Boucher; John S Bradley; Barry I Eisenstein; Dale Gerding; Ruth Lynfield; L Barth Reller; John Rex; David Schwartz; Edward Septimus; Fred C Tenover; David N Gilbert Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Pieter-Jan Cortoos; Bert H J Schreurs; Willy E Peetermans; Karel De Witte; Gert Laekeman Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Jeroen A Schouten; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Stephanie Natsch; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Jos W M van der Meer; Richard P T M Grol Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-04
Authors: Peter Davey; Erwin Brown; Esmita Charani; Lynda Fenelon; Ian M Gould; Alison Holmes; Craig R Ramsay; Philip J Wiffen; Mark Wilcox Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-04-30
Authors: Eili Y Klein; Elena M Martinez; Larissa May; Mustapha Saheed; Valerie Reyna; David A Broniatowski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David A Broniatowski; Eili Y Klein; Larissa May; Elena M Martinez; Chelsea Ware; Valerie F Reyna Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Jonne J Sikkens; Michiel A van Agtmael; Edgar J G Peters; Kamilla D Lettinga; Martijn van der Kuip; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Cordula Wagner; Mark H H Kramer Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873