Vikas Prasad1, Ingo G Steffen2, Gerd Diederichs3, Marcus R Makowski3, Peter Wust4, Winfried Brenner2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. vikas.prasad@charite.de. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the physiological and pathophysiological biodistribution of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC (PSMA-11) ([(68)Ga]PSMA) in patients with prostate cancer (PCA) to establish the range of normal uptake in relevant organs and primary prostate tumours, locally recurrent PCA, lymph and bone metastases and other metastatic lesions. Additionally, we aimed to determine a cut-off uptake value for differentiation of primary tumours from normal prostate tissue. PROCEDURES: Overall, [(68)Ga]PSMA positron emission tomography/x-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) of 101 patients (mean age 69.1 years) with PCA was analysed retrospectively. For assessment of tracer biodistribution, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were calculated for various normal organs, as well as for primary tumours (PT) and/or metastases. Results are presented as median, interquartile range (IQR; 25th quantil-75th quantil) and range (minimum-maximum). RESULTS: [(68)Ga]PSMA PET/CT was performed 50 min (range 30-126) after injection of 109 MBq (range 84-158). Regarding biodistribution, highest uptake (median/IQR/range) of the tracer was found in the kidneys (49.6/40.7-57.6/2.7-97.0) followed by the submandibular glands (17.3/13.7-21.2/7.5-30.4), parotid glands (16.1/12.2-19.8/5.5-30.9) and duodenum (13.8/10.5-17.2/5.8-26.9). The best cut-off value for differentiating physiological uptake in the primary tumour from that in the prostate was found to be an SUVmax of 3.2. The median SUVmax in the PT (n = 35), locally recurrent PCA (n = 8), lymph node (n = 166), bone (n = 157) and other metastases (n = 3) were 10.2, 5.9, 6.2, 7.4 and 3.8, respectively. The best cut-off values for differentiating non-pathological uptake in lymph nodes and bones from tumour uptake were found to be SUVmax of 3.2 and 1.9, respectively. Patients with PSA <2 had significantly lower SUVmax in bone metastases as compared to patients with PSA ≥2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This biodistribution study provided a broad range of uptake data of [(68)Ga]PSMA-11 for normal organs/tissues, primary prostate tumours and metastatic lesions based on a large patient cohort. Both PT and small metastatic lesions were detectable due to their high tracer uptake. Four-times-higher median uptake in PT in comparison to normal prostate stroma resulted in a high diagnostic accuracy that could potentially be used for multimodal image-guided biopsy with dedicated reconstruction software.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the physiological and pathophysiological biodistribution of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC (PSMA-11) ([(68)Ga]PSMA) in patients with prostate cancer (PCA) to establish the range of normal uptake in relevant organs and primary prostate tumours, locally recurrent PCA, lymph and bone metastases and other metastatic lesions. Additionally, we aimed to determine a cut-off uptake value for differentiation of primary tumours from normal prostate tissue. PROCEDURES: Overall, [(68)Ga]PSMA positron emission tomography/x-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) of 101 patients (mean age 69.1 years) with PCA was analysed retrospectively. For assessment of tracer biodistribution, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were calculated for various normal organs, as well as for primary tumours (PT) and/or metastases. Results are presented as median, interquartile range (IQR; 25th quantil-75th quantil) and range (minimum-maximum). RESULTS: [(68)Ga]PSMA PET/CT was performed 50 min (range 30-126) after injection of 109 MBq (range 84-158). Regarding biodistribution, highest uptake (median/IQR/range) of the tracer was found in the kidneys (49.6/40.7-57.6/2.7-97.0) followed by the submandibular glands (17.3/13.7-21.2/7.5-30.4), parotid glands (16.1/12.2-19.8/5.5-30.9) and duodenum (13.8/10.5-17.2/5.8-26.9). The best cut-off value for differentiating physiological uptake in the primary tumour from that in the prostate was found to be an SUVmax of 3.2. The median SUVmax in the PT (n = 35), locally recurrent PCA (n = 8), lymph node (n = 166), bone (n = 157) and other metastases (n = 3) were 10.2, 5.9, 6.2, 7.4 and 3.8, respectively. The best cut-off values for differentiating non-pathological uptake in lymph nodes and bones from tumour uptake were found to be SUVmax of 3.2 and 1.9, respectively. Patients with PSA <2 had significantly lower SUVmax in bone metastases as compared to patients with PSA ≥2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This biodistribution study provided a broad range of uptake data of [(68)Ga]PSMA-11 for normal organs/tissues, primary prostate tumours and metastatic lesions based on a large patient cohort. Both PT and small metastatic lesions were detectable due to their high tracer uptake. Four-times-higher median uptake in PT in comparison to normal prostate stroma resulted in a high diagnostic accuracy that could potentially be used for multimodal image-guided biopsy with dedicated reconstruction software.
Authors: Zsolt Szabo; Esther Mena; Steven P Rowe; Donika Plyku; Rosa Nidal; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hong Fan; Robert F Dannals; Ying Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Melin Vranesic; Akrita Bhatnagar; George Sgouros; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Georg Kuhnert; Ronald Boellaard; Sergej Sterzer; Deniz Kahraman; Matthias Scheffler; Jürgen Wolf; Markus Dietlein; Alexander Drzezga; Carsten Kobe Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Afshar-Oromieh; A Malcher; M Eder; M Eisenhut; H G Linhart; B A Hadaschik; T Holland-Letz; F L Giesel; C Kratochwil; S Haufe; U Haberkorn; C M Zechmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Markus Dietlein; Carsten Kobe; Georg Kuhnert; Simone Stockter; Thomas Fischer; Klaus Schomäcker; Matthias Schmidt; Felix Dietlein; Boris D Zlatopolskiy; Philipp Krapf; Raphael Richarz; Stephan Neubauer; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Anna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Gianpaolo di Santo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Bernard H E Jansen; Gem M Kramer; Matthijs C F Cysouw; Maqsood M Yaqub; Bart de Keizer; Jules Lavalaye; Jan Booij; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michael J Morris; André N Vis; Reindert J A van Moorselaar; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Daniela E Oprea-Lager Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sara Sheikhbahaei; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias Eiber; Lilja B Solnes; Mehrbod S Javadi; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Mohamad E Allaf; Uwe Haberkorn; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Hanna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.226