Literature DB >> 27038287

Deceleration Capacity of Heart Rate Predicts Arrhythmic and Total Mortality in Heart Failure Patients.

Petros Arsenos1, George Manis2, Konstantinos A Gatzoulis1, Polychronis Dilaveris1, Theodoros Gialernios1, Athanasios Angelis1, Achileas Papadopoulos1, Erifili Venieri1, Athanasios Trikas3, Dimitris Tousoulis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deceleration capacity (DC) of heart rate proved an independent mortality predictor in postmyocardial infarction patients. The original method (DCorig) may produce negative values (9% in our analyzed sample). We aimed to improve the method and to investigate if DC also predicts the arrhythmic mortality.
METHODS: Time series from 221 heart failure patients was analyzed with DCorig and a new variant, the DCsgn, in which decelerations are characterized based on windows of four consecutive beats and not on anchors. After 41.2 months, 69 patients experienced sudden cardiac death (SCD) surrogate end points, while 61 died.
RESULTS: (SCD+ vs SCD-group) DCorig: 3.7 ± 1.6 ms versus 4.6 ± 2.6 ms (P = 0.020) and DCsgn: 4.9 ± 1.7 ms versus 6.1 ± 2.2 ms (P < 0.001). After Cox regression (gender, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, filtered QRS, NSVT≥1/24h, VPBs≥240/24h, mean 24-h QTc, and each DC index added on the model separately), DCsgn (continuous) was an independent SCD predictor (hazard ratio [H.R.]: 0.742, 95% confidence intervals (C.I.): 0.631-0.871, P < 0.001). DCsgn ≤ 5.373 (dichotomous) presented 1.815 H.R. for SCD (95% C.I.: 1.080-3.049, P = 0.024), areas under curves (AUC)/receiver operator characteristic (ROC): 0.62 (DCorig) and 0.66 (DCsgn), P = 0.190 (chi-square). Results for deceased versus alive group: DCorig: 3.2 ± 2.0 ms versus 4.8 ± 2.4 ms (P < 0.001) and DCsgn: 4.6 ± 1.4 ms versus 6.2 ± 2.2 ms (P < 0.001). In Cox regression, DCsgn (continuous) presented H.R.: 0.686 (95% C.I. 0.546-0.862, P = 0.001) and DCsgn ≤ 5.373 (dichotomous) presented an H.R.: 2.443 for total mortality (TM) (95% C.I. 1.269-4.703, P = 0.008). AUC/ROC: 0.71 (DCorig) and 0.73 (DCsgn), P = 0.402.
CONCLUSIONS: DC predicts both SCD and TM. DCsgn avoids the negative values, improving the method in a nonstatistical important level.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomic nervous system; deceleration capacity; heart rate dynamics; myocardial infarction; risk stratification; sudden cardiac death

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038287      PMCID: PMC6931782          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  31 in total

1.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  G Breithardt; M E Cain; N el-Sherif; N C Flowers; V Hombach; M Janse; M B Simson; G Steinbeck
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The rate-corrected QT interval calculated from 24-hour Holter recordings may serve as a significant arrhythmia risk stratifier in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Petros Arsenos; Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Theodoros Gialernios; Skevos Sideris; George Lazaros; Stephanos Archontakis; Dimitrios Tsiachris; Efstathios Kartsagoulis; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation for sudden death in selected high risk patients with structural heart disease and preserved systolic function.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Dimitris Tsiachris; Petros Arsenos; Stefanos Archontakis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Apostolis Vouliotis; Skevos Sideris; Ioannis Skiadas; Ioannis Kallikazaros; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Electrical stability of acutely ischemic myocardium. Influences of heart rate and vagal stimulation.

Authors:  K M Kent; E R Smith; D R Redwood; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Heart rate variability in healthy subjects: effect of age and the derivation of normal ranges for tests of autonomic function.

Authors:  I A O'Brien; P O'Hare; R J Corrall
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-04

6.  The deceleration capacity - a new measure of heart rate variability evaluated in patients with schizophrenia and antipsychotic treatment.

Authors:  A Birkhofer; J Geissendoerfer; P Alger; A Mueller; M Rentrop; T Strubel; S Leucht; H Förstl; K-J Bär; G Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.361

Review 7.  Ventricular arrhythmias: from the electrophysiology laboratory to clinical practice. Part II: potentially malignant and benign ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Stefanos Archontakis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Dimitrios Tsiachris; Petros Arsenos; Skevos Sideris; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2012 May-Jun

8.  Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in a nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy population: reappraisal of the role of programmed ventricular stimulation.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Apostolos-Ilias Vouliotis; Dimitris Tsiachris; Maria Salourou; Stefanos Archontakis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Theodoros Gialernios; Petros Arsenos; Georgios Karystinos; Skevos Sideris; Ioannis Kallikazaros; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-15

9.  A chronically implanted system for automatic defibrillation in active conscious dogs. Experimental model for treatment of sudden death from ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  M Mirowski; M M Mower; A Langer; M S Heilman; J Schreibman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Reflex versus tonic vagal activity as a prognostic parameter in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  S H Hohnloser; T Klingenheben; A van de Loo; E Hablawetz; H Just; P J Schwartz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

Authors:  Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Antonios Sideris; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Skevos Sideris; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Combining noninvasive risk stratification parameters improves the prediction of mortality and appropriate ICD shocks.

Authors:  Bert Vandenberk; M Juhani Junttila; Tomas Robyns; Christophe Garweg; Joris Ector; Heikki V Huikuri; Rik Willems
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Deceleration Capacity of Heart Rate Predicts Arrhythmic and Total Mortality in Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Petros Arsenos; George Manis; Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Theodoros Gialernios; Athanasios Angelis; Achileas Papadopoulos; Erifili Venieri; Athanasios Trikas; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Heart rate acceleration and deceleration capacities associated with circadian blood pressure variation.

Authors:  Liyuan Yan; Jianling Jin; Xin Zhao; Xingmei Huang; Wei Zhu; Shili Jiang; Meiwen Gao; Jiamin Yuan
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Risk Prediction for Arrhythmias by Heart Rate Deceleration Runs in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Kong; Xing-De Wang; Shu-Rong Shen; Hua Liu; Li Zhou; Bin Chen; Zhong Chen; Shao-Jun Yin
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-03-17

6.  Noninvasive risk factors for the prediction of inducibility on programmed ventricular stimulation in post-myocardial infarction patients with an ejection fraction ≥40% at risk for sudden cardiac arrest: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Trachanas; Skevos Sideris; Petros Arsenos; Dimitrios Tsiachris; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Polychronis Dilaveris; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Iosif Xenogiannis; Konstantinos Tsimos; Michalis Efremidis; Emmanuel Kanoupakis; Panagiota Flevari; Vassilios Vassilikos; Antonios Sideris; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Konstantinos Gatzoulis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.