Literature DB >> 27037732

Patient-physician communication and health-related quality of life of patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy - a longitudinal multilevel analysis.

Nicole Ernstmann1, Lothar Weissbach2, Jan Herden3, Nicola Winter3, Lena Ansmann4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether patient-physician communication is associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a sample of patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HAROW (Hormonal therapy, Active Surveillance, Radiation, Operation, Watchful Waiting) is a prospective, observational study designed to collect data of the different treatment options for newly diagnosed patients with localised prostate cancer under real-life conditions. At 6-months intervals, clinical data (D'Amico risk categories, Charlson comorbidity index), aspects of patient-provider communication (standardised psychosocial-care instrument for patients' assessment of communication; Cologne Patient Questionnaire), and HRQoL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) were assessed. Data were analysed by longitudinal multilevel analysis.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaires for 1772 patients undergoing a RP were analysed over a 3-year follow-up period. Patients rated the patient-provider communication generally high with slight variations over the course of treatment (3.2-3.8). The HRQoL of the patients varied substantial over time and between the reported subscales (global HRQoL 71.1-77.2; physical functioning 89.1-92.1; role functioning 81.0-88.1; emotional functioning 74.4-84.0; cognitive functioning 84.3-87.7; social functioning (77.7-84.0). The longitudinal multilevel models showed significant associations between patient-provider communication in terms of devotion, support and shared decision-making, and functional aspects of HRQoL.
CONCLUSION: Patient-provider communication is a valuable resource to support patients with prostate cancer coping with the disease and to improve their HRQoL. Future interventions should be designed especially for urologists to enhance their awareness for the importance of communication and the relationship with their patients with prostate cancer for treatment outcomes.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; health-related quality of life; localised prostate cancer; prostatectomy; psychosocial needs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037732     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

1.  Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effect of Surgeon Factors on Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Xiudong Lei; Kevin Diao; Ying Xu; Yu Shen; Grace L Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Sarah M DeSnyder; Kelly K Hunt; Mediget Teshome; Reshma Jagsi; Simona F Shaitelman; Susan K Peterson; Cameron W Swanick
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Exploring the impact of providing men with information about potential prostate cancer treatment options prior to receiving biopsy results.

Authors:  Brindha Pillay; Daniel Moon; Denny Meyer; Helen Crowe; Sarah Mann; Nicholas Howard; Addie Wootten; Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  [The KomMent study: a pilot project on structured interprofessional communication in uro-oncology].

Authors:  Jana Jünger; Dominik Fugmann; Barbara Hinding; Ulrike Necknig; Stefan Bushuven; Stefanie Zschäbitz; Nancy Steiner; Peter Albers; Markus Giessing
Journal:  Urologie       Date:  2022-10-07

5.  Prostate Cancer Patients' Understanding of the Gleason Scoring System: Implications for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Erin K Tagai; Suzanne M Miller; Alexander Kutikov; Michael A Diefenbach; Ronak A Gor; Tahseen Al-Saleem; David Y T Chen; Sara Fleszar; Gem Roy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  A conceptual model of social networks and mechanisms of cancer mortality, and potential strategies to improve survival.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Suitable sexual health care according to men with prostate cancer and their partners.

Authors:  Lorena A Grondhuis Palacios; Esmée M Krouwel; Brenda L den Oudsten; Marjolein E M den Ouden; Gert Jan Kloens; Grethe van Duijn; Hein Putter; Rob C M Pelger; Henk W Elzevier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Supported progressive resistance exercise training to counter the adverse side effects of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruth E Ashton; Jonathan J Aning; Garry A Tew; Wendy A Robson; John M Saxton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Patient-provider discussion about emotional and social needs, mental health outcomes, and benefit finding among U.S. Adults living with cancer.

Authors:  Young-Rock Hong; Sandhya Yadav; Ryan Suk; Ahmad Khanijahani; Daniel Erim; Kea Turner
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Influence of oncology nurses' empathy on lung cancer patients' cellular immunity.

Authors:  Ningxi Yang; Han Xiao; Shiyue Li; Yifang Wang; Yingnan Cao; Hong Yan
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2018-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.