Peter W Greenwald1, Rosa M Estevez2, Sunday Clark3, Michael E Stern4, Tony Rosen5, Neal Flomenbaum6. 1. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: petergreenwald@gmail.com. 2. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: rme2001@nyp.org. 3. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: suc2010@med.cornell.edu. 4. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: mestern@med.cornell.edu. 5. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: trosen73@gmail.com. 6. Emergency Department, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. Electronic address: nef2002@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The elderly population in the United States is growing. This age shift has important implications for emergency departments (EDs), which currently account for more than 50% of inpatient hospitalizations. Our objective was to compare the percentage of inpatient admissions starting in the ED between elderly and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Source of admission to the hospital was evaluated for years 2003 to 2009. Total admissions from the ED and trends over time were analyzed for the following age groups: 22 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ years old. Likelihood of having been admitted from the ED was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1.7 million survey visits representing 216 million adult hospitalizations were analyzed. A total of 93 million (43.2%) were among patients 65 years and older. The ED was the source of admission for 57.3% of patients 65 years and older and 44.4% of patients 64 years and younger (95% confidence interval difference, 12.97%-13.00%). By 2009, more than 75% of nonelective admissions for patients 85 years and older were through the ED. There was a linear relationship between age and the ED as the source of admission, the odds increasing by 2.9% per year (95% confidence interval, 1.029-1.029) for each year beyond age 65 years. CONCLUSION: Emergency departments are increasingly used as the gateway for hospital admission for older adults. An aging US population may increase the effect of this trend, a prospect that should be planned for. From the patient perspective, barriers to care contributing to the age-based discrepancy in the use of the ED as source of admission should be investigated.
INTRODUCTION: The elderly population in the United States is growing. This age shift has important implications for emergency departments (EDs), which currently account for more than 50% of inpatient hospitalizations. Our objective was to compare the percentage of inpatient admissions starting in the ED between elderly and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Source of admission to the hospital was evaluated for years 2003 to 2009. Total admissions from the ED and trends over time were analyzed for the following age groups: 22 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+ years old. Likelihood of having been admitted from the ED was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1.7 million survey visits representing 216 million adult hospitalizations were analyzed. A total of 93 million (43.2%) were among patients 65 years and older. The ED was the source of admission for 57.3% of patients 65 years and older and 44.4% of patients 64 years and younger (95% confidence interval difference, 12.97%-13.00%). By 2009, more than 75% of nonelective admissions for patients 85 years and older were through the ED. There was a linear relationship between age and the ED as the source of admission, the odds increasing by 2.9% per year (95% confidence interval, 1.029-1.029) for each year beyond age 65 years. CONCLUSION: Emergency departments are increasingly used as the gateway for hospital admission for older adults. An aging US population may increase the effect of this trend, a prospect that should be planned for. From the patient perspective, barriers to care contributing to the age-based discrepancy in the use of the ED as source of admission should be investigated.
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Don Melady; Craig Krausz; Jason Wagner; Brian Froelke; Jennifer Cordia; Derrick Lowery; Brent E Ruoff; Laurie E Byrne; Douglas K Miller; Lawrence Lewis Journal: Mo Med Date: 2017 Nov-Dec
Authors: Emily S Wang; Sadie Trammell Velásquez; Christopher J Smith; Tabatha H Matthias; David Schmit; Sherwin Hsu; Luci K Leykum Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amanda S Carmel; Peter Steel; Robert Tanouye; Aleksey Novikov; Sunday Clark; Sanjai Sinha; Judy Tung Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-14
Authors: Meng-Han Tsai; Sudha Xirasagar; Scott Carroll; Charles S Bryan; Pamela J Gallagher; Kim Davis; Edward C Jauch Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Zhongxun Hu; Fahad Javaid Siddiqui; Qiao Fan; Sherman W Q Lian; Nan Liu; Marcus E H Ong Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Brian Buta; Ari B Friedman; Shang-En Chung; Orla C Sheehan; Marcela D Blinka; Susan L Gearhart; Qian-Li Xue Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Elijah Blue Dahlstrom; Jin Ho Han; Heather Healy; Maura Kennedy; Glenn Arendts; Jacques Lee; Chris Carpenter; Sangil Lee Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 2.692