| Literature DB >> 27036527 |
Alba Cortés1, Javier Sotillo2,3, Carla Muñoz-Antolí2, María Trelis2, J Guillermo Esteban2, Rafael Toledo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Echinostoma caproni is an intestinal trematode extensively used as experimental model for the study of factors that determine the course of intestinal helminth infections, since this markedly depends on the host species. Although the host-dependent mechanisms for either chronic establishment or early parasite rejection have been broadly studied, little is known regarding the parasite response against different host environments.Entities:
Keywords: 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis; Echinostoma caproni; Excretory/secretory products; Helminth; Proteome plasticity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27036527 PMCID: PMC4815245 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1465-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Experimental strategy for the comparison of the excretory/secretory proteomes of Echinostoma caproni adult worms isolated from mice and rats
Fig. 2Representative 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis image. Grey circles indicate spots overexpressed in the excretory/secretory products (ESPs) of rats and black circles indicate spots overexpressed in the ESPs of mice
Fig. 3Western blot validation of several differentially expressed protein spots. Representative images of blots confirming host-dependent differential expression of the four tested proteins. Validations were performed in duplicate, employing distinct biological replicates from each host. Fold changes were calculated using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) on the two replicates, and are presented as the ratio between the mean values calculated for each host species. Spot numbers refer to Fig. 2 and Table 1
Identification of differentially expressed proteins
| Spota | Identificationb | Proteinc | Species (GI)d | Hoste | Fold Changef | MW Exp/Theo | pI Exp/Theo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genome | Transcriptome | |||||||
| Antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes | ||||||||
| 6 | √ | Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase |
| M | 5.3 | 47.8/53.0 | 7.2/6.5 | |
| 10 | √ | √ | Aldo-keto reductase |
| R | 2.9 | 33.6/33.5 | 6.4/7.7 |
| 12 | √ | √ | Aldo-keto reductase |
| R | 4.6 | 33.0/33.5 | 6.6/7.7 |
| 13 | √ | √ | Aldo-keto reductase |
| M | 2.0 | 31.3/35.5 | 6.7/7.7 |
| 16 | √ | √ | Hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase |
| M | 1.8 | 25.0/29.6 | 6.9/6.9 |
| 17 | √ | √ | Thiopurine S-methyltransferase |
| M | 2.1 | 23.0/28.1 | 6.7/7.1 |
| 19 | √ | √ | Glutathione S-transferase class-mu |
| M | 1.8 | 16.5/25.3 | 7.1/5.9 |
| Metabolic enzymes | ||||||||
| 2 | √ | √ | Leucine aminopeptidase |
| M | 1.5 | 61.5/59.9 | 7.8/6.1 |
| 3 | √ | √ | Retinal dehydrogenase 1 |
| M | 3.5 | 50.0/52.6 | 6.8/6.0 |
| 4 | √ | √ | Hexokinase |
| M | 1.9 | 48.7/50.0 | 7.2/6.2 |
| 5 | √ | √ | 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase |
| M | 2.2 | 48.7/52.8 | 7.3/6.2 |
| 7 | √ | Malate dehydrogenase |
| M | 5.1 | 47.8/55.7 | 7.3/6.6 | |
| 8 | √ | √ | Enolase |
| M | 1.7 | 45.5/46.1 | 6.8/6.4 |
| Structural/Motor proteins | ||||||||
| 9 | √ | √ | Putative actin |
| R | 2.0 | 43.7/41.7 | 5.9/5.3 |
| 18 | √ | √ | Regulator of microtubule dynamics protein 1 |
| M | 1.9 | 21.0/24.3 | 6.0/8.6 |
| Cysteine proteases | ||||||||
| 15 | √ | √ | Cathepsin L |
| R | 2.3 | 26.1/37.0 | 6.1/5.5 |
| Protein binding | ||||||||
| 11 | √ | √ | Stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 |
| M | 2.8 | 32.4/36.3 | 6.5/6.3 |
| Unknown | ||||||||
| 1g | √ | √ | Periostin |
| R | 2.9 | 90.0/105.3 | 6.8/5.8 |
| √ | √ | Fasciclin 1-like |
| |||||
| √ | √ | Gynecophoral canal protein |
| |||||
| 14 | √ | √ | Putative TyrA protein |
| M | 2.8 | 32.4/41.6 | 6.5/7.0 |
Protein identification was performed using X!Tandem and MS-GF+ search engines on the Echinostoma caproni genome and transcriptome databases and BLASTp against NCBInr protein database. Spot numbers refer to gel image in Fig. 2
aSpot reference number
bPositive identification (√) in each of the two databases employed
cIdentification details are compiled in Additional file 3
dGI accession number in the Protein database of NCBI
eHost species in which every protein spot was overexpress. (M) Mouse; (R) Rat
fAverage Normalized Volume ratio
gThree different proteins were associated with the same accession number both in the E. caproni genome and transcriptome databases