Literature DB >> 27036288

Temporal alignment of pupillary response with stimulus events via deconvolution.

Daniel R McCloy1, Eric D Larson1, Bonnie Lau1, Adrian K C Lee1.   

Abstract

Analysis of pupil dilation has been used as an index of attentional effort in the auditory domain. Previous work has modeled the pupillary response to attentional effort as a linear time-invariant system with a characteristic impulse response, and used deconvolution to estimate the attentional effort that gives rise to changes in pupil size. Here it is argued that one parameter of the impulse response (the latency of response maximum, t(max)) has been mis-estimated in the literature; a different estimate is presented, and it is shown how deconvolution with this value of t(max) yields more intuitively plausible and informative results.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27036288      PMCID: PMC5392052          DOI: 10.1121/1.4943787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

Authors:  Eric Maris; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Stefan M Wierda; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen; Sander Martens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

Authors:  J Beatty
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Pupil diameter and load on memory.

Authors:  D Kahneman; J Beatty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Roman Goj; Mainak Jas; Teon Brooks; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings.

Authors:  Connor Spiech; George Sioros; Tor Endestad; Anne Danielsen; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  A linear oscillator model predicts dynamic temporal attention and pupillary entrainment to rhythmic patterns.

Authors:  Lauren K Fink; Brian K Hurley; Joy J Geng; Petr Janata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Pupil responses associated with the perception of gravitational vertical under directional optic flows.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Park; Sung Ik Cho; June Choi; JungHyun Han; Yoon Chan Rah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.