European pollen databases are more accessible and widespread than those in the United States, says Richard Flagan, a professor of environmental science and engineering at the California Institute of Technology. He says that’s chiefly because European national weather agencies take responsibility for sampling and organizing the information in ways that scientists can use for research.By contrast, pollen sampling in the United States is performed by a constellation of agencies and allergy clinics. Currently 84 of these sampling stations submit their data to a volunteer organization called the National Allergy Bureau™ (NAB), which is organized by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). Bielory says the AAAAI provides quality control in the form of training and certification for contributors on how to sample airborne pollen.Using two different climate models, researchers modeled historical levels of ragweed pollen in Europe (frames a/b), then projected increases by 2050 (frames c/d and e/f). Some areas saw a projected fourfold jump.Source: Hamaoui-Laguel et al. (2015)The NAB provides daily pollen counts to local media outlets, but it won’t release any data for research without the consent of the sampling stations that collected it. To access those data, scientists have to submit formal requests describing their research plans. The NAB passes approved requests to the appropriate member stations, which have 30 days to respond.Flagan describes his efforts to access NAB data as “an exercise in frustration” that was frequently met with unanswered phone calls and e-mails. “Moreover, the way these stations collect data isn’t compatible with science,” he says. “We have at best a semi-qualitative historical record supplied by people who do not focus on the statistics of the measurement—that record has some scientific value, but you have to look at it with a big grain of salt. In reality, the pollen database in the United States is abysmal.”The USDA’s Ziska says the NAB has become more cooperative and responsive to the needs of outside researchers. But he adds that since NAB sampling stations use different tools and methodologies to collect pollen, rather than one uniform system, their data can be difficult to aggregate and compare.Bielory, who contributes to the NAB, agrees on the need for a national monitoring system that collects, stores, analyzes, and shares pollen data for the purpose of advancing science and health policy issues. The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, a professional association for public health epidemiologists, has proposed such a system in a draft white paper that it plans to finalize at its June 2016 annual conference.
Lab Results Hint at Possibilities
Even as researchers grapple with limited field data, they continue to produce compelling results in climate-controlled chambers that predict future effects on allergenic species. In her research at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, Kristina Stinson, an assistant professor of environmental conservation, grows ragweed in greenhouses containing CO2 at levels ranging from 360 ppm—just under the current ambient concentration—to 720 ppm. Stinson says higher CO2 levels could force evolutionary changes in ragweed. A study she published in 2011 showed that genotypes that are suppressed at current CO2 levels devoted more resources to reproduction as CO2 levels rose. In other words, she says, more genotypes overall were flowering. Stinson says that while she didn’t measure pollen output directly, “we do note that more vigorous flowering and higher pollen production are usually correlated.”Warming is expected to increase with increasing distance from the equator. One multiyear study in North America found that pollen seasons lengthened incrementally with increasing northern latitude—by up to 4 weeks—while decreasing slightly in the southernmost monitoring location.Source: U.S. EPA, based on data from Ziska et al. (2011)Her colleague Jennifer Albertine, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, generated comparable results with timothy grass, a widespread perennial in North America and Europe and a major cause of early summer allergies. Albertine studied the effects of CO2 at both 400 and 800 ppm. She found that timothy grass exposed to 800 ppm CO2 produced roughly twice as much pollen as the lower-exposed grass.Albertine also tested the effects of boosting ground-level ozone, which ordinarily slows plant growth by inducing oxidative damage. Coupled climate/tropospheric chemistry modeling indicates ozone levels could rise significantly by the end of the century as emissions of precursor pollutants also continue rising. Albertine’s study didn’t reveal any growth-limiting effect of ozone on grasses raised in elevated CO2. But she did find that the grasses responded to higher ozone levels by making less of their allergenic protein (Phl p 5). However, any reduction in the plant’s allergenic protein content, Albertine predicted, would be offset by a corresponding increase in pollen production, for a net boost in allergenic threat. (Similarly, Ziska’s research showed that when raised in greenhouses containing up to 600 ppm CO2, ragweed plants produced 60–80% more of their allergenic protein, Amb a 1.)Stinson acknowledges that, although greenhouses allow for a controlled assessment of how atmospheric conditions affect allergenic plants, they don’t replicate the real world, where other pollutants, humidity, rainfall, and additional soil nutrients—especially nitrogen—also influence plant growth and pollination patterns. With funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, she’s now collaborating with David Foster, director of the 3,750-acre Harvard Forest, on a project to map ragweed hot spots in New England. Their field studies so far, which have been submitted for publication, show that ragweed plants from urban and rural areas differ in the extent and timing of flower production and in their responses to CO2.Among other research questions, Stinson hopes to explore spatial patterns in how people experience the effects of climate change on pollen production. “We may find that urban populations from a particular demographic might be disproportionately affected by how climate change affects allergenicity,” she says.
Authors: Lewis Ziska; Kim Knowlton; Christine Rogers; Dan Dalan; Nicole Tierney; Mary Ann Elder; Warren Filley; Jeanne Shropshire; Linda B Ford; Curtis Hedberg; Pamela Fleetwood; Kim T Hovanky; Tony Kavanaugh; George Fulford; Rose F Vrtis; Jonathan A Patz; Jay Portnoy; Frances Coates; Leonard Bielory; David Frenz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mona Sarfaty; Brittany Bloodhart; Gary Ewart; George D Thurston; John R Balmes; Tee L Guidotti; Edward W Maibach Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-02
Authors: D Solé; V E Cassol; A R Silva; S P Teche; T M Rizzato; L C Bandim; E S C Sarinho; I C Camelo-Nunes Journal: Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.667
Authors: Kazuhiko Ito; Kate R Weinberger; Guy S Robinson; Perry E Sheffield; Ramona Lall; Robert Mathes; Zev Ross; Patrick L Kinney; Thomas D Matte Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: David M Hondula; Robert C Balling; Riley Andrade; E Scott Krayenhoff; Ariane Middel; Aleš Urban; Matei Georgescu; David J Sailor Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Kyu Rang Kim; Jae-Won Oh; Su-Young Woo; Yun Am Seo; Young-Jin Choi; Hyun Seok Kim; Wi Young Lee; Baek-Jo Kim Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Monika Nitschke; David Simon; Keith Dear; Kamalesh Venugopal; Hubertus Jersmann; Katrina Lyne Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 4.614